We study the association between skin tone and socioeconomic outcomes in Mexico. Previous studies have relied on subjective measures of skin tone, but these may suffer from measurement error and bias from “money lightening” effects, and they do not include other physical attributes, which could lead to overestimation. We use a new data source in Mexico specifically designed to address these challenges, including an objective measurement of skin tone based on optical colorimeters. We find that the estimates of the association between skin tone and socioeconomic outcomes are consistent across data collection techniques (interviewer-rated, self-rated, machine-rated) and surveys. Around half of the association is explained by differences in socioeconomic background, a finding that emphasizes the importance of considering both historically accumulated disadvantages and current mechanisms of generating inequality. We also find that phenotypical characteristics other than skin tone (eye and hair color) are significant predictors of socioeconomic outcomes. These findings suggest that more than a strict pigmentocracy, where light skin is the only element or the definitive one, ethnoracial stratification in Mexico may be better characterized in a broader sense: as one where people with a set of racialized physical features linked to European origins have greater accumulated privilege and social advantages than those with features linked to Indigenous or Black ancestry.
AbascalMariaGarciaDenia. 2022. “Pathways to Skin Color Stratification: The Role of Inherited (Dis)Advantage and Skin Color Discrimination in Labor Markets.”Sociological Science9:346–73. doi:10.15195/v9.a14.
2.
Arceo-GomezEvaCampos-VazquezRaymundo. 2014. “Race and Marriage in the Labor Market : A Discrimination Correspondence Study in a Developing Country.” American Economic Review104(5):376–80.
3.
BaileyStanley R.FialhoFabrício M.PennerAndrew M.2016. “Interrogating Race: Color, Racial Categories, and Class Across the Americas.”American Behavioral Scientist60(4):538–55. doi:10.1177/0002764215613400.
4.
BaileyStanley R.SapersteinAliyaPennerAndrew M.2014. “Race, Color, and Income Inequality across the Americas.”Demographic Research31:735–56. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.24.
5.
Campos-VazquezRaymundo M.Medina-CortinaEduardo M.2019. “Skin Color and Social Mobility: Evidence From Mexico.”Demography56(1):321–43. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0734-z.
6.
Campos-VazquezRaymundo M.NuñezRoy. 2018. “Obesity and Labor Market Outcomes in Mexico.”Estudios Económicos34(2):159–96.
7.
Casas MartínezRicardoSaldívarEmikoFloresRenéSueChristina. 2014. “The Different Faces of Mestizaje: Ethnicity and Race in Mexico.” Pp. 36–80 in Pigmentocracies. Ethnicity, Race, and Color in Latin America, edited by TellesE.Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
8.
CastellanosGuerrero, Alicia. 2005. “Exclusión Étnica En Ciudades Del Centro y Sureste.” in Urbi Indiano: la larga marcha a la ciudad diversa. Ciudad de México, México: Dirección General de Equidad y Desarrollo Social, Gobierno del Distrito Federal. Retrieved November 18, 2023 (https://docplayer.es/55898043-Urbi-indiano-la-larga-marcha-a-la-ciudad-diversa.html).
9.
Del BinoS.BernerdF.2013. “Variations in Skin Colour and the Biological Consequences of Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure.” British Journal of Dermatology169:33–40. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12529.
10.
DixonAngela R.TellesEdward. 2017. “Skin Color and Colorism: Global Research, Concepts, and Measurement.”Annual Review of Sociology43:405–24. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053315.
11.
FilmerDeonPritchettLant H.2001. “Estimating Wealth Effects without Expenditure Data-or Tears: An Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India.”Demography38(1):115–32.
12.
FloresRenéTellesEdward. 2012. “Social Stratification in Mexico: Disentangling Color, Ethnicity, and Class.”American Sociological Review77(3):486–94. doi:10.1177/0003122412444720.
13.
FriedlanderJudith. 1975. “What It Means to Be Indian in Hueyapan.” in Being Indian in Hueyapan. A Study of Forced Identity in Contemporary Mexico. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
14.
GabbertWolfgang. 2001. “Social Categories, Ethnicity and the State in Yucatán, Mexico.”Journal of Latin American Studies33(3):155–73.
15.
GanzeboomHarry B. G.TreimanDonald J.1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social Science Research25(3):201–39. doi:10.1006/ssre.1996.0010.
16.
GarciaDeniaAbascalMaria. 2016. “Colored Percep-tions: Racially Distinctive Names and Assessments of Skin Color.”American Behavioral Scientist60(4):420–41. doi:10.1177/0002764215613395.
17.
GüémezBraulioSolísPatricio. 2022. “Ethnoracial and Educational Homogamy in Mexico: A Multidimensional Perspective.” Population Research and Policy Review. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09729-z.
18.
KrozerAliceGómezAndrea. 2023. “Not in the Eye of the Beholder: Racialization, Whiteness, and Beauty Standards in Mexico.”Latin American Research Review58(2):422–39. doi:10.1017/lar.2022.104.
19.
LovemanMara. 2014. National Colors. Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
Ly, BaoChau K.DyerEthan B.FeigJessica L.ChienAnna L.Del BinoSandra. 2020. “Research Techniques Made Simple: Cutaneous Colorimetry: A Reliable Technique for Objective Skin Color Measurement.”Journal of Investigative Dermatology140(1):3–121. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2019.11.003.
21.
McNameeLachlan. 2020. “Colonial Legacies and Comparative Racial Identification in the Americas.”American Journal of Sociology126(2):318–53. doi:10.1086/711063.
22.
MonkEllis P.2015. “The Cost of Color: Skin Color, Discrimination, and Health among African-Americans.”American Journal of Sociology121(2):396–444. doi:10.1086/682162.
23.
MonkEllis P. 2022. “Inequality without Groups: Contemporary Theories of Categories, Intersectional Typicality, and the Disaggregation of Difference.” Sociological Theory40(1):3–27. doi: 10.1177/07352751221076863.
24.
MonkEllis P.EspositoMichael H.LeeHedwig. 2021. “Beholding Inequality: Race, Gender, and Returns to Physical Attractiveness in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology127(1):194–241. doi: 10.1086/715141.
25.
Monroy-Gómez-FrancoLuis A.Vélez-GrajalesRobertoYalonetzkyGastón. 2018. “Layers of Inequality: Social Mobility, Inequality of Opportunity and Skin Colour in Mexico.” Working Paper No. 03/2018. Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias, Ciudad de México, México.
26.
Moreno FigueroaMónica G. 2012. “‘Yo Nunca He Tenido La Necesidad de Nombrarme’: Reconociendo El Racismo y El Mestizaje En México.” Pp. 15–48 in Racismos y otras formas de intolerancia de Norte a Sur en América Latina, edited by GuerreroA. CastellanosBenítezG. LandázuriMéxicoCiudad de México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana y Juan Pablos.
27.
NutiniHugo G.1997. “Class and Ethnicity in Mexico: Somatic and Racial Considerations.”Ethnology36(3):227–38.
28.
OstfeldMara C.YadonNicole D.2022. “¿Mejorando La Raza?: The Political Undertones of Latinos’ Skin Color in the United States.”Social Forces100:1806–32. doi:10.1093/sf/soab060.
29.
ReeskensTimAguilarRodrigo Velasco. 2021. “Being White Is a Full Time Job? Explaining Skin Tone Gradients in Income in Mexico.”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies47:46–68. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1775071.
30.
RothWendy D.2016. “The Multiple Dimensions of Race.”Ethnic and Racial Studies39(8):1310–38. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1140793.
31.
RothWendy D.SolísPatricioSueChristina A.2022. “Beyond Money Whitening: Racialized Hierarchies and Socioeconomic Escalators in Mexico.”American Sociological Review87:827–59. doi:10.1177/00031224221119803.
32.
RyabovIgor. 2016. “Educational Outcomes of Asian and Hispanic Americans: The Significance of Skin Color.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility44:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2015.11.001.
33.
SaldívarEmiko. 2014. “‘It’s Not Race, It’s Culture’: Untangling Racial Politics in Mexico.”Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies9(1):89–108. doi:10.1080/17442222.2013.874644.
34.
SaldívarEmikoSolísPatricioArenasErika. 2020. “Consideraciones Metodológicas Para El Conteo de La Población Afromexicana En El Censo 2020.”Coyuntura Demográfica14:49–56.
35.
SapersteinAliyaPennerAndrew M.2012. “Racial Fluidity and Inequality in the United States.”American Journal of Sociology118(3):676–727.
36.
SchachterArielaFloresRené D.MaghboulehNeda. 2021. “Ancestry, Color, or Culture? How Whites Racially Classify Others in the U.S.” American Journal of Sociology126(5):1220–63. doi: 10.1086/714215.
37.
SchwartzmanLuisa Farah. 2007. “Does Money Whiten ? Intergenerational Changes in Racial Classification in Brazil.”American Sociological Review72(6):940–63.
38.
SolísPatricioGranielBraulio GüémezHolmVirginia Lorenzo. 2019. Por mi raza hablará la desigualdad. Efectos de las características étnico-raciales en la desigualdad de oportunidades en México.México: Oxfam.
39.
SolísPatricioGüémezBraulio. 2020. Características étnico-raciales y desigualdad de oportunidades económicas en México. Vol. 36. Ciudad de México, México: Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos.
40.
SolísPatricioKrozerAliceArroyo BatistaCarlosGranielBraulio Güémez. 2019. “Discriminación Étnico-Racial En México: Una Taxonomía de Las Prácticas.” in La métrica de lo intangible: del concepto a la medición de la discriminación. Ciudad de México, México: Consejo Nacional para Prevenir la Discriminación. Retrieved November 18, 2023 (https://discriminacion.colmex.mx/?p=3737).
41.
TellesEdward. 2014. Pigmentocracies. Ethnicity, Race, and Color in Latin America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
42.
TellesEdwardFloresRenéUrrea-GiraldoFernando. 2015. “Pigmentocracies: Educational Inequality, Skin Color and Census Ethnoracial Identification in Eight Latin American Countries.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility40:39–58. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2015.02.002.
43.
TellesEdwardPaschelTianna. 2014. “Who Is Black, White, or Mixed Race? How Skin Color, Status, and Nation Shape Racial Classification in Latin America.”American Journal of Sociology120(3):864–907. doi:10.1086/679252.
44.
VillarrealAndrés. 2010. “Stratification by Skin Color in Contemporary Mexico.”American Sociological Review75(5):652–78. doi:10.1177/0003122410378232.
45.
VillarrealAndrés. 2014. “Ethnic Identification and Its Consequences for Measuring Inequality in Mexico.”American Sociological Review79(4):775–806. doi:10.1177/0003122414541960.
46.
VillarrealAndrésBaileyStanley R.2020. “The Endogeneity of Race: Black Racial Identification and Men’s Earnings in Mexico.”Social Forces98:1744–72. doi:10.1093/sf/soz096.
47.
VoglTom S.2014. “Height, Skills, and Labor Market Outcomes in Mexico.”Journal of Development Economics107:84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.007.
48.
WeatherallIan L.CoombsBernard D.1992. “Skin Color Measurements in Terms of CIELAB Color Space Values.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology99(4):468–73. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12616156.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
