Beginning with President Trump’s speech against the national anthem protestors in September 2017, the authors consider how external sociopolitical events interacted with the network structure of the 2017 National Football League (NFL) to alter the salience of member identities and the resultant patterns of protest activity within the league. Using group membership data on the full population of 2,453 football players, the analysis tracks protest participation by membership in race and status groups and by the network variables of degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality. Black and elite players are both overrepresented among protesters throughout the season. The margins of overrepresentation narrowed during an increase in demonstrations after Trump’s first criticisms but had widened by the end of the season. The mean centralities of the protesting groups varied from week to week because of an increase in the salience of the NFL player identity and its interaction with racial identities. In general, protesters had lower mean degree and closeness centralities and a higher mean betweenness centrality than players who abstained from protest. Those who participated in high-risk forms of activism also tended to have lower mean degree and closeness centralities and a higher mean betweenness centrality than those who opted for low-risk demonstrations. These findings indicate that sociopolitical events can implicate different identities, changing their salience in the decision to join or abstain from a social movement.
BassAmy. 2002. Not the Triumph but the Struggle: The 1968 Olympics and the Making of the Black Athlete. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
BiggsMichael. 2003. “Positive Feedback in Collective Mobilization: The American Strike Wave of 1886.” Theory and Society32(2):217–54.
4.
BlumerHerbert. 1951. “Collective Behavior.” Pp. 166–222 in New Outline of the Principles of Sociology, edited by LeeA. M.New York: Barnes & Noble.
5.
BraddockJomills HenryIISmithErykaDawkinsMarvin P.2012. “Race and Pathways to Power in the National Football League.” American Behavioral Scientist56(5):711–27.
BrooksScott N.BlackmanDexter. 2011. “Introduction: African Americans and the History of Sport—New Perspectives.” Journal of African American History96(4):441–47.
DionKenneth. 2000. “Group Cohesion: From ‘Field of Forces’ to Multidimensional Construct.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice4(1):7–26.
12.
EdwardsHarry. 2003. “Mounting the Protest.” Pp. 285–89 in The Unlevel Playing Field: A Documentary History of the African American Experience in Sport, edited by WigginsD. K.MillerP. B.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13.
EdwardsHarry. 2018. The Revolt of the Black Athlete. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
EisingerPeter K.1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review67(1):11–28.
GiuffreKatherine. 2013. Communities and Networks. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
20.
GouldRoger V.1991. “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.” American Sociological Review56(6):716–29.
21.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
22.
HartmannDouglas. 1996. “The Politics of Race and Sport: Resistance and Domination in the 1968 African American Olympic Protest Movement.” Ethnic and Racial Studies19(3):548–66.
23.
HartmannDouglass. 2004. Race, Culture and the Revolt of the Black Athlete: The 1968 Olympic Protests and their Aftermath. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
HendersonSimon. 2010. “‘Nasty Demonstrations by Negroes’: The Place of the Smith-Carlos Podium Salute in the Civil Rights Movement.” Bulletin of Latin American Research29:78–92.
KooistraPaulMahoneyJohn S.BridgesLisha. 1993. “The Unequal Opportunity for Equal Ability Hypothesis: Racism in the National Football League?” Sociology of Sport Journal10(3):241–55.
31.
KrinskyJohnCrossleyNick. 2014. “Social Movements and Social Networks: Introduction.” Social Movement Studies13(1):1–21.
32.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
McAdamDoug. 1986. “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of the Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology92(1):64–90.
34.
McAdamDougPaulsenRonnelle. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism.” American Journal of Sociology99(3):640–67.
35.
MeyerDavid S.2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology30:125–45.
36.
MeyerDavid S.StaggenborgSuzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology101(6):1628–60.
37.
MurrellAudrey J.CurtisEdward M.1994. “Causal Attributions of Performance for Black and White Players in the NFL.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues18(3):224–33.
38.
NivenDavid. 2005. “Race, Quarterbacks, and the Media: Testing the Rush Limbaugh Hypothesis.” Journal of Black Studies35(5):684–94.
39.
PeeryDestinyBodenhausenGalen V.2008. “Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in Reflexive Categorization of Racially Ambiguous Faces.” Psychological Science19(10):973–77.
40.
OatesThomas P.DurhamMeenakshi Gigi. 2005. “The Mismeasure of Masculinity: The Male Body, ‘Race,’ and Power in the Enumerative Discourses of the NFL Draft.” Patterns of Prejudice38(3):301–20.
41.
OliverPamela E.1989. “Bringing the Crowd Back In: The Nonorganizational Elements of Social Movements.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change11:1–30.
42.
RatchfordJamal. 2012. “‘Black Firsts and Fool’s Gold: The 1960s Black Athletic Revolt Reconsidered’: The LeBron James Decision and Self-Determination in Post-racial America.” Black Scholar42(1):49–59.
43.
RayKathrynSavageMikeTampubolonGindoWardeAlanLonghurstBrianTomlinsonMark. 2003. “The Exclusiveness of the Political Field: Networks and Political Mobilization.” Social Movement Studies2(1):37–60.
44.
RosenthalNaomiFingrutdMeylEthierMicheleKarantRobertaMcDonaldDavid. 1985. “Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Women’s Reform in New York State.” American Journal of Sociology90(5):1022–54.
45.
RuffinHerbert G.2014. “‘Doing the Right Thing for the Sake of Doing the Right Thing’: The Revolt of the Black Athlete and the Modern Student-Athletic Movement, 1956–2014.” Western Journal of Black Studies38(4):260–78.
46.
SailesGary A.1991. “The Myth of Black Sports Supremacy.” Journal of Black Studies21(4):480–87.
SaundersClare. 2007. “Using Social Network Analysis to Explore Social Movements: A Relational Approach.” Social Movement Studies6(3):227–43.
50.
SimmelGeorg. [1908] 1971. “Group Expansion and the Development of Individuality.” Pp. 251–93 in Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms, edited by LevineD. N.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
SmithJohn Matthew. 2007. “‘Breaking the Plane’: Integration and Black Protest in Michigan State University Football during the 1960s.” Michigan Historical Review33(2):101–29.
52.
SnowDavid A.ZurcherLouis A.Jr.Eckland-OlsonSheldon. 1980. “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment.” American Sociological Review45:787–801.
53.
SorekTamirWhiteRobert G.2016. “American Football and National Pride: Racial Differences.” Social Science Research58:266–78.
54.
SpiveyDonald. 1983. “The Black Athlete in Big-Time Intercollegiate Sports, 1941–1968.” Phylon44(2):116–25.
StevensonWilliam B.GreenburgDanna. 2000. “Agency and Social Networks: Strategies of Action in a Social Structure of Position, Opposition, and Opportunity.” Administrative Science Quarterly45(4):651–78.
StrykerSheldon. 1968. “Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and the Family30:558–64.
60.
TarrowSidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Conscientious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TillyCharles. 1998. “Social Movements and (All Sorts of) Other Political Interactions.” Theory and Society27(4):453–80.
ZaldMayer N.UseemBert. 1987. “Movement and Countermovement Interaction: Mobilization, Tactics, and State Involvement.” Pp. 247–72 in Social Movements in an Organizational Society, edited by ZaldM. N.McCarthyJ. D.New Brunswick: Transaction.
