Access to public spaces played an important role in constructing and defining racial boundaries in the late nineteenth century. In 1883, San Antonio’s Mexican American elites protested an order permanently barring them from using the dance pavilion in San Pedro Springs Park, resulting in the public censure of the park manager who gave the order and affirmations of Tejano elites’ right to equal access to public spaces. The author analyzes this historical case to show the importance of the race-class intersection, specifically racialized class identities, as a resource in racial boundary shifting: the movement of racial boundaries across people. Public exchanges in the “San Pedro Park incident” either challenged or defended Mexican Americans’ equal access to a white public space by drawing on competing racial narratives about their fitness for middle-class identity. The author argues that analyses of racial boundary shifting must give careful consideration to how social actors use understandings of class to expand or contract racial boundaries. Reproducing class identities that ensure continued economic domination over racial minorities is a central part of maintaining the racial order.
AlbaRichard. 2005. “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.”Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1):20–49.
2.
AlonzoA.1998. Tejano Legacy: Rancheros and Settlers in South Texas, 1734–1900. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
3.
ArcherMelanieBlauJudith R.1993. “Class Formation in Nineteenth-century America: The Case of the Middle Class.”Annual Review of Sociology19:17–41.
4.
BarrAlwyn. 1970. “Occupational and Geographic Mobility in San Antonio, 1870–1900.”Social Science Quarterly51(2):396–403.
5.
BedermanGail. 1995. Manliness & Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BeiselNicola Kay. 1992. “Constructing a Shifting Moral Boundary: Literature and Obscenity in Nineteenth-century America.” Pp. 104–28 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by LamontMichèleFournierMarcel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BeiselNicola Kay. 1997. Imperiled Innocents: Anthony Comstock and Family Reproduction in Victorian America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
8.
BeiselNicola KayKayTamara. 2004. “Abortion, Race, and Gender in Nineteenth-century America.”American Sociological Review69(4):498–518.
9.
Benton-CohenKatherine. 2009. Borderline Americans: Racial Division and Labor War in the Arizona Borderlands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BergquistJames M.2008. Daily Life in Immigrant America, 1820–1870. New York: Greenwood.
11.
Berg-SobréJudith. 2003. San Antonio on Parade: Six Historic Festivals. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
12.
BledsoeA. T.HerrickS.M.I.B.1871. “The Latin Races in America.”The Southern Review11(18):320–46.
13.
BluminStuart M.1989. The Emergence of the Middle Class: Social Experience in the American City, 1760–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation.”American Sociological Review62(3):465–80.
15.
BrackGene M.1970. “Mexican Opinion, American Racism, and the War of 1846.”The Western Historical Quarterly:161–74.
16.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1998. Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Congressional Globe. 1848. “Remarks of Senator John C. Calhoun, South Carolina.” Senate, 30th Congress, 1st Session, pp. 96–100.
18.
DaniellLewis E.1890. Types of Successful Men of Texas. Austin, TX: E. Von Boeckmann.
19.
De LeónArnoldo. 1982. The Tejano Community, 1836–1900. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
20.
De LeónArnoldo. 1983. They Called Them Greasers: Anglo Attitudes toward Mexicans in Texas, 1821–1900. Austin: University of Texas Press.
21.
De LeónArnoldoMcDonaldD. R.2013. José Antonio Navarro: In Search of the American Dream in Nineteenth-century Texas. Denton: Texas State Historical Association.
22.
DonovanBrian. 2007. White Slave Crusades : Race, Gender, and Anti-vice Activism, 1887–1917. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
FoleyNeil. 1998. “Becoming Hispanic: Mexican Americans and the Faustian Pact with Whiteness.” Pp. 53–70 in Reflexiones: New Directions in Mexican American Studies, edited by MontejanoDavid. Austin: Center for Mexican American Studies/University of Texas Press.
24.
FoxCybelleGuglielmoThomas A.2012. “Defining America’s Racial Boundaries: Blacks, Mexicans, and European Immigrants, 1890–1945.”American Journal of Sociology118(2):327–79.
25.
GarciaRichard A.1991. Rise of the Mexican American Middle Class: San Antonio, 1929–1941. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
26.
GlennEvelyn Nakano. 2002. Unequal Freedom: How Race and Gender Shaped American Citizenship and Labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
GómezLaura E.2007. Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race. New York: New York University Press.
28.
GrossAriela J.2006. “The Caucasian Cloak: Mexican Americans and the Politics of Whiteness in the Twentieth-century Southwest.”Georgetown Law Journal95(1):337–92.
29.
HaleGrace Elizabeth. 1998. Making Whiteness: The Culture of Segregation in the South, 1890–1940. New York: Pantheon.
30.
HarveyDavid. 2001. Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. New York: Routledge.
31.
HodesMartha Elizabeth. 1997. White Women, Black Men: Illicit Sex in the Nineteenth-century South. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
JacobsonMatthew Frye. 1998. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
JewellJoseph O.2014. “Mixing Bodies and Minds: Race, Class and ‘Mixed Schooling’ Controversies in New Orleans and Atlanta, 1874–87.”Patterns of Prejudice48(1):25–45.
34.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirag. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.”Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
35.
LamontMichèleBailChristopher. 2007. “Bridging Boundaries: The Equalization Strategies of Stigmatized Ethno-racial Groups Compared.” Center for European Studies Working Paper Series No. 154. Cambridge, MA: Center for European Studies.
36.
LeeRebecca Smith. 1967. “The Publication of Austin’s Louisville Address.”Southwestern Historical Quarterly70(3):424–42.
37.
LefebvreHenri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38.
LewisAmanda E.2004. “‘What Group?’: Studying Whites and Whiteness in the Era of ‘Color-blindness’.”Sociological Theory22(4):623–46.
39.
LipsitzGeorge. 2011. How Racism Takes Place. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40.
LovemanMaraMunizJerónimo O.2007. “How Puerto Rico Became White: Boundary Dynamics and Intercensus Racial Reclassification.”American Sociological Review72(6):915–39.
41.
LuiM.T.Y.2005. The Chinatown Trunk Mystery: Murder, Miscegenation, and Other Dangerous Encounters in Turn-of-the-century New York City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
MasonKenneth. 1998. African Americans and Race Relations in San Antonio, Texas, 1867–1937. New York: Garland.
43.
MenchacaMartha. 2001. Recovering History, Constructing Race: The Indian, Black, and White Roots of Mexican Americans. Austin: University of Texas Press.
44.
MontejanoDavid. 1987. Anglos and Mexicans in the Making of Texas, 1836–1986. Austin: University of Texas Press.
45.
NeelyBrookeSamuraMichelle. 2011. “Social Geographies of Race: Connecting Race and Space.”Ethnic and Racial Studies34(11):1933–52.
46.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.
47.
PachuckiMark APendergrassSabrinaLamontMichéle. 2007. “Boundary Processes: Recent Theoretical Developments and New Contributions.”Poetics35(6):331–51.
48.
PereaJuan F.2003. “A Brief History of Race and the US-Mexican Border: Tracing the Trajectories of Conquest.”UCLA Law Review51:283–312.
49.
PoyoGerald E.HinojosaGilberto M.1991. Tejano Origins in Eighteenth-century San Antonio. Austin: University of Texas Press.
50.
RamosR. A.2008. Beyond the Alamo: Forging Mexican Ethnicity in San Antonio, 1821–1861. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
51.
RoedigerDavid R.2005. Working toward Whiteness: How America’s Immigrants Became White: The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Suburbs. New York: Basic Books.
52.
RyanM. P.1997. Civic Wars: Democracy and Public Life in the American City During the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
San MiguelGuadalupeJr.1979. “From a Dual to a Tri-partite School System: The Origins and Development of Educational Segregation in Corpus Christi, Texas.”Integrated Education17(1):27–38.
54.
ScobeyDavid. 1992. “Anatomy of the Promenade: The Politics of Bourgeois Sociability in Nineteenth-century New York.”Social History17(2):203–27.
55.
SojaEdward. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
56.
StewartKenneth L.De LeónArnoldo. 1993. Not Room Enough: Mexicans, Anglos, and Socio-economic Change in Texas, 1850–1900. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
57.
StinchcombeArthur L.1982. “The Deep Structure of Moral Categories, Eighteenth Century French Stratification, and the Revolution.”Structural Sociology1982(1):66–95.
58.
TwineFrance WinddanceGardenerBradley. 2013. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–16 in Geographies of Privilege, edited by TwineFrance WinddanceGardenerBradley. New York: Routledge.
59.
Valerio-JiménezOmar S.2013. River of Hope: Forging Identity and Nation in the Rio Grande Borderlands. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60.
WacquantLoic J. D.1997. “For an Analytic of Racial Domination.”Political Power and Social Theory11:221–34.
61.
WelkeB. Y.2001. Recasting American Liberty: Gender, Race, Law, and the Railroad Revolution, 1865–1920. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WimmerAndreas. 2008. “Elementary Strategies of Ethnic Boundary Making.”Ethnic and Racial Studies31(6):1025–55.
63.
WinantH.1994. Racial Conditions: Politics, Theory, Comparisons. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
ZamoraEmilio. 1993. The World of the Mexican Worker in Texas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
65.
ZolbergAristide R.WoonLong Litt. 1999. “Why Islam Is Like Spanish: Cultural Incorporation in Europe and the United States.”Politics & Society27(1):5–38.
