Metal additive manufacturing faces challenges in directly fabricating end-use components due to the poor surface quality. Plasma electrolytic polishing (PEP) is an efficient and environmentally friendly surface treatment technology, demonstrating significant potential to enhance the surface quality of additively manufactured metal components. In this study, the surface characteristics of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel polished by PEP, including surface morphology, chemical composition, and wettability, are systematically investigated. First, the influence of key processing parameters, such as polishing time, voltage, electrolyte temperature, and concentration, on surface roughness was comprehensively examined through a series of experiments. The surface roughness was significantly reduced from 10.479 μm to 2.195 μm by using an optimized parameter combination: a polishing voltage of 300 V, an electrolyte concentration of 3%, an electrolyte temperature of 75°C, and a polishing time of 30 min. Then, surface characteristics of specimens treated with optimized PEP process parameters were studied and compared with those of as-fabricated specimens. Results showed that defects on the surface of as-fabricated specimens, such as adhered powders and oxides, were effectively removed by PEP. In addition, PEP can significantly improve the wettability of the specimens, with the contact angle decreasing from 80.9° to 39.4°. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of PEP of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel, indicating its potential for post-processing applications.
XuYH, LiYH, ChenTY, et al.A short review of medical-grade stainless steel: Corrosion resistance and novel techniques. J Mater Res Technol2024;29:2788–2798; doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.240
2.
HuangRZ, RiddleM, GrazianoD, et al.Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: The case of lightweight aircraft components. J Clean Prod2016;135:1559–1570; doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109
3.
NgoTD, KashaniA, ImbalzanoG, et al.Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering2018;143:172–196; doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
4.
BobanJ, AhmedA, JithinrajEK, et al.Polishing of additive manufactured metallic components: Retrospect on existing methods and future prospects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022;121(1–2):83–125; doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-09382-y
5.
YungKC, WangWJ, XiaoTY, et al.Laser polishing of additive manufactured CoCr components for controlling their wettability characteristics. Surface and Coatings Technol2018;351:89–98; doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.030
6.
BeaucampAT, NambaY, CharltonP, et al.Finishing of electron beam melted titanium (Ti6Al4 V) using shape adaptive grinding tools. ASPE Spring Meeting-Additive Manufacturing, Berkeley, California, USA, 2014; doi:10.13140/2.1.4937.7287
7.
SankarMR, JainVK, RamkumarJ. Rotational abrasive flow finishing (R-AFF) process and its effects on finished surface topography. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture2010;50(7):637–650; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.03.007
8.
RahmanZ, DeenKM, CanoL, et al.The effects of parametric changes in electropolishing process on surface properties of 316L stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci2017;410:432–444; doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.081
9.
TyagiP, GouletT, RisoC, et al.Reducing the roughness of internal surface of an additive manufacturing produced 316 steel component by chempolishing and electropolishing. Addit Manuf2019;25:32–38; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.001
10.
LiuSG, LiCJ, JinX, et al.Quantitative-regulated material removal rate in solid dielectric electrochemical polishing (QRR-SDEP) for smoothing high roughness surface of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel components. Addit Manuf2023;73:103689; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103689
11.
LiuSG, LiCJ, GuoZL, et al.Efficient solid dielectric electrochemical polishing with minimal electrolyte consumption and reusable conductive media. J Clean Prod2024;467:142888; doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142888
12.
LiuSG, LiCJ, JinX, et al.Solid dielectric electrochemical polishing of 3D-printed parts: Performance and mechanisms. Int J Mech Sci2025;285:109822; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109822
13.
RosaB, MognolP, HascoëtJ-y. Laser polishing of additive laser manufacturing surfaces. J. Laser Appl2015;27(S2):S29102; doi: 10.2351/1.4906385
14.
LamikizA, SánchezJA, López de LacalleLN, et al.Laser polishing of parts built up by selective laser sintering. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf2007;47(12–13):2040–2050; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.01.013
15.
MalekiE, BagherifardS, BandiniM, et al.Surface post-treatments for metal additive manufacturing: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Addit Manuf2021;37:101619; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101619
16.
BashaMM, BashaSM, JainVK, et al.State of the art on chemical and electrochemical based finishing processes for additive manufactured feature. Addit Manuf2022;58:103028; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103028
17.
NestlerK, Böttger-HillerF, AdamitzkiW, et al.Plasma electrolytic polishing – an overview of applied technologies and current challenges to extend the polishable material range. Procedia CIRP2016;42:503–507; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.240
18.
KröningO, SchulzeH-P, KranholdC, et al.Investigation of the ignition phase in electrolytic plasma polishing under different starting conditions. Procedia CIRP2020;95:993–998; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.287
19.
HuangY, WangC, DingF, et al.Principle, process, and application of metal plasma electrolytic polishing: A review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021;114(7–8):1893–1912; doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-07012-7
20.
ParfenovEV, FarrakhovRG, MukaevaVR, et al.Electric field effect on surface layer removal during electrolytic plasma polishing. Surface and Coatings Technology2016;307:1329–1340; doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.066
21.
GuptaP, TenhundfeldG, DaigleEO, et al.Electrolytic plasma technology: Science and engineering—An overview. Surface and Coatings Technology2007;201(21):8746–8760; doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.023
22.
BelkinPN, KusmanovSA, ParfenovEV. Mechanism and technological opportunity of plasma electrolytic polishing of metals and alloys surfaces. Appl Surface Sci Adv2020;1(1):100016; doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100016
23.
SabotinI, JermanM, LebarA, et al.Effects of plasma electrolytic polishing on SLM printed microfluidic platform. AdvTech&Mat2022;47(1):19–23; doi: 10.24867/atm-2022-1-004
24.
BashaMM, SankarMR. Finishing of additively manufactured stainless steel features by the eco-friendly electrolyte: Plasma and surface interaction science. J Manuf Process2024;119:609–625; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.016
25.
LöberL, FlacheC, PettersR, et al.Comparison of different post processing technologies for SLM generated 316L steel parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal2013;19(3):173–179; doi: 10.1108/13552541311312166
26.
WahlJP, NSehoon, FoestR, et al.Surface treatment of additively manufactured stainless steel 316L lattice structures by plasma electrolytic polishing. Procedia CIRP2024;124:669–672; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.198
27.
AblyazTR, MuratovKR, RadkevichMM, et al.Electrolytic plasma surface polishing of complex components produced by selective laser melting. Russ Engin Res2018;38(6):491–492; doi: 10.3103/S1068798X18060035
28.
DuJ, LiuB, ZhaoY. Nucleation bubble boundary layer theory for ultra-fast electrochemical polishing of additive manufacturing components. Addit Manuf2024;92:104362; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2024.104362
29.
WangJ, SuoLC, GuanLL, et al.Optimization of processing parameters for electrolysis and plasma polishing. AMM2012;217–219:1368–1371; doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.217-219.1368
30.
SushilK, SharmaV, JhaSK, et al.Effect of process parameters on the roughness and wetting characteristics of ss304 surfaces using electrolytic and plasma electrolytic polishing techniques. J Electrochem Soc2024;171(6):63508; doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ad590c
31.
LesykDA, MartinezS, MordyukBN, et al.Post-processing of the Inconel 718 alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting: Effects of mechanical surface treatments on surface topography, porosity, hardness and residual stress. Surface and Coatings Technology2020;381:125136; doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125136
32.
LiP, GongY, WenX, et al.Surface residual stresses in additive/subtractive manufacturing and electrochemical corrosion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018;98(1–4):687–697; doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-2283-4
