To address the dual requirements of lightweight and high-performance structural design, this study investigated the compressive properties of three aluminum-based mechanical metamaterials with different lattice structures but the same mass, which were fabricated by laser fusion additive manufacturing. The three structures are porous structure, truss structure, and gyroid structure. Through quasi-static compression tests, numerical simulations, and microstructure analysis, we examined the effects of geometric design, micro-defects, and local deformation on the mechanical response and deformation mechanism. The research results indicated that the uniformity of stress distribution, the defect sensitivity, and the grain refinement significantly affect the energy absorption capacity and strength of the material. Reducing local strain concentration, improving surface quality, and promoting grain fragmentation are the keys to enhancing the mechanical properties of the material during compression. These findings provide unique insights into the structure-performance relationship of alloy lattice metamaterials and offer support for the optimization design of aluminum-based metamaterials in lightweight structural applications.
HeZ, YuanK, XiongG, et al.Inverse design and experimental verification of metamaterials for thermal illusion using genetic algorithms. Chinese Phys Lett, 2023; 40(10):104402; doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/40/10/104402
2.
LiuY, GralakB, GuenneauS. Finite element analysis of electromagnetic waves in two-dimensional transformed bianisotropic media. Opt Express, 2016; 24(23):26479–26493; doi: 10.1364/OE.24.026479
3.
Che GhaniSA, MohamedSR, Sha’banM, et al.Experimental investigation of biological and mechanical properties of CoCrMo based selective laser melted metamaterials for bone implant manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 2020; 89:79–91; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.122
4.
RajR, Jiyalal PrajapatiM, TsaiJ-T, et al.Design and additive manufacturing of novel hybrid lattice metamaterial for enhanced energy absorption and structural stability. Materials & Design, 2024; 245:113268; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113268
5.
TaoC, WangZ, ZhaoR, et al.Design of lattice metamaterials under the equal strength concept and research on the mechanical properties of their sandwich structures. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024; 205:112498; doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2024.112498
6.
MizziL, MahdiEM, TitovK, et al.Mechanical metamaterials with star-shaped pores exhibiting negative and zero Poisson’s ratio. Materials & Design, 2018; 146:28–37; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.051
7.
ChenK, DongX, PengZ, et al.Reconfigurable topological gradient metamaterials and potential applications. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024; 205:112572; doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2024.112572
8.
ZhaoS, LiSJ, HouWT, et al.The influence of cell morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2016; 59:251–264; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.034
HanC, WangY, WangZ, et al.Enhancing mechanical properties of additively manufactured voronoi-based architected metamaterials via a lattice-inspired design strategy. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2024; 202:104199; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2024.104199
11.
LiuG, ZhangX, ChenX, et al.Additive manufacturing of structural materials. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2021; 145:100596; doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2020.100596
12.
Anonymous. Adv Eng Mater - 2019 - Tepylo – Laser-based additive manufacturing technologies for aerospace applications. n.d.
13.
VafadarA, GuzzomiF, RassauA, et al.Advances in metal additive manufacturing: A review of common processes, industrial applications, and current challenges. Applied Sciences, 2021; 11(3):1213; doi: 10.3390/app11031213
14.
FanJ, ZhangL, WeiS, et al.A review of additive manufacturing of metamaterials and developing trends. Materials Today, 2021; 50:303–328; doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.019
15.
RajeevGP, RahulMR, KamarajM, et al.Microstructure and high temperature mechanical properties of wire arc additively deposited Stellite 6 alloy. Materialia (Oxf), 2020; 12:100724; doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100724
16.
HanQ, MertensR, Montero-SistiagaML, et al.Laser powder bed fusion of Hastelloy X: Effects of hot isostatic pressing and the hot cracking mechanism. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2018; 732:228–239; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.008
17.
TomusD, TianY, RometschPA, et al.Influence of post heat treatments on anisotropy of mechanical behaviour and microstructure of Hastelloy-X parts produced by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016; 667:42–53; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.086
18.
SanchezS, SmithP, XuZ, et al.Powder Bed Fusion of nickel-based superalloys: A review. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2021; 165:103729; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103729
19.
LuN, LeiZ, HuK, et al.Hot cracking behavior and mechanism of a third-generation Ni-based single-crystal superalloy during directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf, 2020; 34:101228; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101228
20.
GuoB, ZhangY, YangZ, et al.Cracking mechanism of Hastelloy X superalloy during directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2022; 55:102792; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102792
21.
GornyB, NiendorfT, LackmannJ, et al.In situ characterization of the deformation and failure behavior of non-stochastic porous structures processed by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2011; 528(27):7962–7967; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.026
22.
MurrLE. Open-cellular metal implant design and fabrication for biomechanical compatibility with bone using electron beam melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017; 76:164–177; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.019
23.
Anonymous. S12540-019-00441-w. n.d.
24.
YanW, GeW, QianY, et al.Multi-physics modeling of single/multiple-track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting. Acta Mater, 2017; 134:324–333; doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.061
25.
LiY, YuS, ChenY, et al.Wire and arc additive manufacturing of aluminum alloy lattice structure. J Manuf Process, 2020; 50:510–519; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.049
26.
Van BaelS, KerckhofsG, MoesenM, et al.Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2011; 528(24):7423–7431; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.045
27.
QiuC, YueS, AdkinsNJE, et al.Influence of processing conditions on strut structure and compressive properties of cellular lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2015; 628:188–197; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.031
28.
Freitas RodriguesP, CachoL, GatõesD, et al.Embedded NiTi strain sensors in additively manufactured AlSi10Mg: Computational and experimental insights into phase transformation and sensing performance. Results Eng, 2025; 28:107395; doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107395
29.
García-ZapataJM, TorresB, RamsJ. Effects of building direction, process parameters and border scanning on the mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg. Materials (Basel), 2024; 17(15):3655; doi: 10.3390/ma17153655
30.
ShenW, XueF, LiC, et al.Study on constitutive relationship of 6061 aluminum alloy based on Johnson-Cook model. Mater Today Commun, 2023; 37:106982; doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106982
31.
WangP, ZhouH, ZhangL, et al.In situ X-ray micro-computed tomography study of the damage evolution of prefabricated through-holes in SLM-Printed AlSi10Mg alloy under tension. J Alloys Compd, 2020; 821:153576; doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153576
32.
Anonymous. 2013-34-Gong (3). n.d.
33.
LinY, ZhangQ, ZhangF, et al.Microstructure and strength correlation of pure Al and Al-Mg syntactic foam composites subject to uniaxial compression. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017; 696:236–247; doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.060
34.
GaoJ, AnZ, MaQ, et al.Probability model of residual strength of materials under uncertain cyclic load. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Sci), 2020; 25(2):266–272; doi: 10.1007/s12204-020-2172-5
35.
ZhangX, ShiY, PanG, et al.Study on the impact performance of sandwich hollow cylinders hitting water based on SPH method. Ocean Engineering, 2020; 197:106808; doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106808
36.
BaiL, YiC, ChenX, et al.Effective design of the graded strut of BCC Lattice structure for improving mechanical properties. Materials (Basel), 2019; 12(13):2192; doi: 10.3390/ma12132192
37.
WangZ-W, EYP. Mathematical modelling of energy absorption property for paper honeycomb in various ambient humidities. Materials & Design, 2010; 31(9):4321–4328; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.053
38.
StanevL, KolevM, DrenchevB, et al.Open-cell metallic porous materials obtained through space holders—Part I: Production methods. A review. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2017; 139(5):050801.
39.
ZanX, WangD, ShiK, et al.Effect of MoSi2/rare earth composite particles on microstructure and mechanical properties of molybdenum. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2011; 29(4):505–508; doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.02.011
