The article investigates African American community views on the development of hog-farm-based biogas production in rural North Carolina. In 2023, five focus groups (N = 51) were conducted in Sampson County, the site of the first large-scale biogas project in North Carolina. The results suggest a prevalence of a “social gap” in the outlook of the residents, that is, they favored biogas as a source of renewable energy in general but opposed its development for their area. A hierarchical-nested analytical model of the “social gap” is developed and compared with the positions of other biogas supporters and detractors in the state. African American community views were closer to anti-biogas advocates, such as environmentalists, in asserting that biogas capture will do little to alleviate the most hazardous impacts of hog farming associated with large-scale manure discharges in surrounding farm areas. However, residents also considered biogas as having a potential for positive economic and environmental impacts, a position that was more in line with the stance of pro-biogas developers and state regulators.
AddisonCorban. 2022. Wastelands: The True Story of Farm Country on Trial. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2.
Align RNG. 2023. Farm to Energy. Harnessing Clean, Renewable Energy From Our Nation’s Hog Farms for the Good of the Climate, Consumers and Family Farmers. Richmond, VA and Smithfield, VA: Dominion Energy and Smithfield. Retrieved July 9, 2025. (https://alignrng.com/).
3.
AndersenMikael S.MassaIlmo. 2000. “Ecological Modernization—Origins, Dilemmas and Future Directions.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning2(4):337–45.
4.
AnguelovskiIsabelleAlierJoan M.2014. “The ‘Environmentalism of the Poor’ Revisited: Territory and Place in Disconnected Glocal Struggles.” Ecological Economics102:167–76.
BatelSusana. 2020. “Research on the Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: Past, Present and Future.” Energy Research & Social Science68:101544.
9.
BellDerekGrayTimHaggettClaire. 2005. “The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses.” Environmental Politics14(4):460–77.
10.
BerkhoutFrans. 2002. “Technological Regimes, Path Dependency and the Environment.” Global Environmental Change12(1):1–4.
BurninghamKateBarnettJulieWalkerGordon. 2015. “An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers’ Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents.” Society and Natural Resources28(3):246–60.
13.
CalidoriNoemiFrigoGiovanniHillerbrandRafaela. 2024 “‘Just’ Energy? An Ecofeminist Analysis and Critique of a Predominant Conception of Energy.” Energy, Sustainability, and Society14:65.
14.
CapodaglioAndrea G.CallegariAriannaLopezMaria V., 2016. “European Framework for the Diffusion of Biogas Uses: Emerging Technologies, Acceptance, Incentive Strate-gies, and Institutional-Regulatory Support.” Sustainability8(4):1–18.
15.
CarlisleJuliet E.SolanDavidKaneStephanie L.JoeJeffrey. 2016. “Utility-Scale Solar and Public Attitudes Toward Siting: A Critical Examination of Proximity.” Land Use Policy58:491–501.
16.
Chodkowska-MiszczukJustyna. 2022. “A New Narrative for Sustainability: Exploring Biogas Plants as ‘First Movers’ in Raising Energy Awareness.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education38(2):152–67.
17.
ChowkwanyunMerlin. 2023. “Environmental Justice: Where It Has Been, and Where It Might Be Going.” Annual Review of Public Health44:93–111.
18.
ColeDanaToddLoriWingSteven. 2000. “Concentrated Swine Feeding Operations and Public Health: A Review of Occupational and Community Health Effects.” Environmental Health Perspectives108(8):685–99.
19.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2022. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
20.
ConradLettie Y.TuckerVirginia M.2018. “Making It Tangible: Hybrid Card Sorting Within Qualitative Interviews.” Journal of Documentation75(2):397–416.
21.
CooperRoy. 2023. Executive Order No 292. Advancing Environmental Justice for North Carolina. October 24. Raleigh, NC: State of North Carolina. Retrieved October 11, 2024 (https://governor.nc.gov/executive-order-no-292/open/).
22.
CrawfordJessicaBessetteDouglasMillsSarah B.2022. “Rallying the Anti-crowd: Organized Opposition, Democratic Deficit, and a Potential Social Gap in Large-Scale Solar Energy.” Energy Research & Social Science90:102597.
23.
Devine-WrightPatrick. 2005. “Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy.” Wind Energy8(2):125–39.
24.
Devine-WrightPatrick. 2009. “Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity Inexplaining Place-Protective Action.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology19:426–41.
25.
DonhamKelley J.WingStevenOsterbergDavidFloraJan L.HodneCarolThuKendall M.ThornePeter S.2007. “Community Health and Socioeconomic Issues Surrounding Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” Environmental Health Perspectives115(2):317–20.
EdwardsBobLaddAnthony . 2000. “Environmental Justice, Swine Production and Farm Loss in North Carolina,” Sociological Spectrum20(3):263–290.
29.
EdwardsBobDriscollAdam. 2009. “From Farm to Factories: The Environmental Consequences of Swine Industrialization in North Carolina.” Pp. 153–75 in Twenty Lessons in Environmental Sociology, edited by GouldKenneth AlanLewisTammy L.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
EomKiminKimHeejung SShermanDavid K. 2018. “Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology77:60–75.
31.
FirestoneJeremyKemptonWillettLilleyMeredith B.SamoteskulKateryna. 2012. “Public Acceptance of Offshore Wind Power Across Regions and Through Time.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management55(10):1369–86.
GANC. 2023. SESSION LAW 2023-137 HOUSE BILL 600. An Act to Provide Further Regulatory Relief to the Citizens of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: General Assembly of North Carolina. Retrieved October 11, 2024 (https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2023/Bills/House/PDF/H600v8.pdf).
37.
GittelsonPhoebeDiamondDanielleHenningLynnPayanMariaUteschLynnUteschNancy. 2022. “The False Promises of Biogas: Why Biogas is an Environmental Justice Issue.” Environmental Justice15(6):352–61.
38.
GregerMichaelKoneswaranGowri. 2010. “The Public Health Impacts of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations on Local Communities.” Family & Community Health33(1):11–20.
39.
GuestGregNameyEmilyMcKennaKevin. 2017. “How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes.” Field Methods29(1):3–22.
40.
HaroldJasonBertschValentinLawrenceThomasHallMagie. 2021. “Drivers of People’s Preferences for Spatial Proximity to Energy Infrastructure Technologies: A Cross-Country Analysis.” The Energy Journal42(4):47–90.
41.
HodneCarol. 2004. “Rural Environmental Health and Industrial Agriculture: A Case Example of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” Pp. 61–73 in Critical Issues in Rural Health, edited by GlasgowNinaJohnsonNan E.MortonLois Wright. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishers.
IsaksonHans R.EckerMark D.2008. “An Analysis of the Impact of Swine CAFOs on the Value of Nearby Houses.” Agricultural Economics39(3):365–72.
44.
JänickeMartin. 2008. “Ecological Modernisation: New Perspectives.” Journal of Cleaner Production16(5):557–65.
45.
JuskaArunas. 2010. “’Profits to the Danes, for us – Hog stench?’ The Campaign Against Danish swine CAFOs in Rural Lithuania.” Journal of Rural Studies26(3):250–259.
46.
JuskaArunasEdwardsBob. 2005. “Refusing the Trojan pig: The US-Poland Coalition against Corporate Pork Production.” Pp. 187-207 in Coalitions Across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neo-Liberal Order, edited by BrandyJoeSmithJackie. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
47.
KilpatrickJohn A.2001. “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations and Proximate Property Values.” The Appraisal Journal (July):301–306.
48.
KingAbbyCamperoMariaGarciaDulceBlanco-VelazquezIselaBanchoffAnnFierrosFernandoEscobarMichele, et al. 2021. “Testing the Effectiveness of Community-Engaged Citizen Science to Promote Physical Activity, Foster Healthier Neighborhood Environments, and Advance Health Equity in Vulnerable Communities: The Steps for Change Randomized Controlled Trial Design and Methods.” Contemporary Clinical Trials108:106526.
49.
KravchenkoJuliaRhewSung HanAkushevichIgorAgarwalPankajLyerlyH. Kim. 2018. “Mortality and Health Outcomes in North Carolina Communities Located in Close Proximity to Hog Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” North Carolina Medical Journal79(5):278–88.
50.
LaddAnthonyEdwardsBob. 2002. “Corporate Swine, Capitalist Pigs: A Decade of Environmental Justice in North Carolina.” Social Justice29(3):26–46.
51.
MarsonStephen M.LegertonMac. 2021. “Disaster Diaspora and the Consequences of Economic Displacement and Climate Disruption, Including Hurricanes Matthew (October 8, 2016) and Florence (September 14, 2018) in Robeson County, North Carolina.” Natural Hazards107(3):2247–62.
52.
Martínez-AlierJoan. 2002. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
53.
MohaiPaulBryantBunyan. 1998. “Is There a ‘Race’ Effect on Concern for Environmental Quality?”The Public Opinion Quarterly62(4):475–505.
NelsonHal T.WikstromKrisHassSamanthaSarleKirsten. 2021. “Half-Length and the FACT Framework: Distance-Decay and Citizen Opposition to Energy Facilities.” Land Use Policy101:1–19.
61.
NicoleWendee. 2013. “CAFOs and Environmental Justice: The Case of North Carolina.” Environmental Health Perspective121(6):183–89.
O’NeilSandra George. 2021. “Community Obstacles to Large Scale Solar: NIMBY and Renewables.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences11:85–92.
65.
Ongiyo-KisiiCharles. 2019. “Analysis of Socio-Economic, Factors Influencing Adoption of Biogas Technology Among Farm Households in North Rift Region, Kenya.” Africa International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research1(1):1–17.
66.
PalmquistRaymond B.RokaFritz M.VukinaTomislav. 1997. “Hog Operations, Environmental Effects, and Residential Property Values.” Land Economics73(1):114–24.
67.
RaphaelChadMatsuokaMartha. 2023. “Aligning Community-Engaged Research Methods with Diverse Community Organizing Approaches.” Social Sciences12:343.
SolandMartinSteimerNoraWalterGötz. 2013. “Local Acceptance of Existing Biogas Plants in Switzerland.” Energy Policy61:802–10.
74.
SongHwanseokLewisNeil A.Jr.BallewMatthew T.BravoMarioDavydovaJulieGaoOliver H.GarciaRobert J.2020. “What Counts as an ‘Environmental’ Issue? Differences in Issue Conceptualization by Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status.” Journal of Environmental Psychology68:1–9.
StreteskyPaul B.JohnstonJanis E.ArneyJeremy. 2003. “Environmental Inequity: An Analysis of Large-Scale Hog Operations in 17 States, 1982–1997.” Rural Sociology68(2):231–52.
80.
TajikMansourehMinklerMeredith. 2006. “Environmental Justice Research and Action: A Case Study in Political Economy and Community-Academic Collaboration.” International Quarterly of Community Health Education26(3):213–31.
WågströmAngelicaMichaelKavya. 2023. “Caring for Energy, Energy to Care: Exploring the Energy-Care Nexus Through Examples from Sweden and India.” Energy Research & Social Science99:103042.
85.
WalkerGordon. 2012. Environmental Justice Concepts, Evidence and Politics. London: Routledge.
WilsonSacoby M.HowellFrankWingSteveSobseyMark. 2002. “Environmental Injustice and the Mississippi Hog Industry.” Environmental Health Perspectives110(2):195–201.
88.
WingSteveColeDanaGrantGary. 2000. “Environmental Injustice in North Carolina’s Hog Industry.” Environmental Health Perspectives108(3):225–31.
89.
WingSteveGrantGaryGreenMerleStewartChris. 1996. “Community Based Collaboration for Environmental Justice: South-East Halifax Environmental Reawakening.” Environment and Urbanization8(2):129–40.
90.
WingSteveHortonRachel A.MarshallStephen W.ThuKendallTajikMansourehSchinasiLeahSchiffmanSusan S.2008. “Air Pollution and Odor in Communities Near Industrial Swine Operations.” Environmental Heath Perspectives116(10):1362–68.
91.
WolsinkMaarten. 2000. “Wind Power and the NIMBY-Myth: Institutional Capacity and the Limited Significance of Public Support.” Renewable Energy21(1):49–64.
92.
WolsinkMaarten. 2007. “Wind Power Implementation: The Nature of Public Attitudes: Equity and Fairness Instead of ‘Backyard Motives’.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews11(6):1188–207.
93.
WustenhagenRolfWolsinkMaartenBurerMary Jean. 2007. “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept.” Energy Policy35(5):2638–91.
