We compare environmental concern between people in the United States and China by analyzing two General Social Surveys carried out in 2010. The two surveys have the same questions about the environment that have been answered by national probability samples of respondents from each country. This study serves as a starting point to understand variation in environmental concern between these two countries that have major global environmental impacts. Our hypotheses draw on the measurement hypothesis and the theory of planned behavior. We found the Chinese report higher environmental concern when measured as environmental sacrifice and perceived dangerousness, whereas the Americans reported a greater frequency of pro-environmental behaviors. Results from structural equation modeling show that the connections between sociodemographic predictors and environmental concern vary depending on the dimension of environmental concern being examined. We discuss these findings in the context of existing literature and factors unique to each country.
AcockAlan C.2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata, Revised Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
2.
AjzenIcek. 1988. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
3.
AjzenIcek. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2):179–211.
4.
ArmitageChristopher J.ConnerMark. 2001. “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-analytic Review.” British Journal of Social Psychology40(4):471–99.
5.
ArvolaAnneVassalloMarcoDeanMoiraPirittaLampilaSabaAnnaLähettnmäkiLiisaShepherdRichard J.2008. “Predicting Intentions to Purchase Organic Food: The Role of Affective and Moral Attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Appetite50(2–3):443–54.
6.
BakakiZorzetaBernauerThomas. 2017. “Do Global Climate Summits Influence Public Awareness and Policy Preferences Concerning Climate Change?” Environmental Politics26(1):1–26.
7.
BambergSebastianHuneckeMarcelBlobaumAnke. 2007. “Social Context, Personal Norms and the Use of Public Transportation: Two Field Studies.” Journal of Environmental Psychology27(3):190–203.
8.
BambergSebastianMöserGuido. 2007. “Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-analysis of Psycho-social Determinants of Pro-environmental Behavior.” Journal of Environmental Psychology27(1):14–25.
9.
BambergSebastianSchmidtPeter. 2003. “Incentives, Morality, or Habit? Predicting Students’ Car Use for University Routes with the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis.” Environment & Behavior35(2):264–85.
10.
BianYanjieLiLulu. 2012. “The Chinese General Social Survey (2003-8).” Chinese Sociological Review45(1):70–97.
11.
BrechinSteven R.1999. “Objective Problems, Subjective Values, and Global Environmentalism: Evaluating the Postmaterialist Argument and Challenging a New Explanation.” Social Science Quarterly80(4):793–809.
12.
BrulleRobert J.TurnerLiesel H.CarmichaelJasonJenkinsCraig J.2007. “Measuring Social Movement Organization Populations: A Comprehensive Census of U.S. Environmental Movement Organizations.” Mobilization12(3):255–70.
13.
ChenXiaodongPetersonM. NilsHullVanessaLuChuntianHongDayongLiuJianguo. 2013. “How Perceived Exposure to Environmental Harm Influences Environmental Behavior in Urban China.” Ambio42(1):52–60.
14.
ClementsJohn M.McCrightAaron M.XiaoChenyang. 2013. “Green Christians? An Empirical Examination of Environmental Concern within the U.S. General Public.” Organization & Environment27(1):85–102.
15.
DiekmannAndreasFranzenAxel. 1999. “The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern.” Environment & Behavior31(4):540–49.
16.
DunlapRiley E.JonesRobert E.2002. “Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Pp. 482–524 in Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by DunlapRiley E.MichelsonWilliam. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
17.
DunlapRiley E.MertigAngela G.1995. “Global Concern for the Environment: Is Affluence a Prerequisite?” Journal of Social Issues51(4):121–37.
18.
EchavarrenJose M.2016. “From Objective Environmental Problems to Subjective Environmental Concern: A Multilevel Analysis Using 30 Indicators of Environmental Quality.” Society & Natural Resources30(2):145–59.
19.
FarrowKatherineGrolleauGillesIbanezLisette. 2017. “Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence.” Ecological Economics140:1–13.
20.
FranzenAxelMeyerReto. 2010. “Environmental Attitudes in Cross-national Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000.” European Sociological Review26(2):219–34.
21.
FranzenAxelVoglDominikus. 2013. “Two Decades of Measuring Environmental Attitudes: A Comparative Analysis of 33 Countries.” Global Environmental Change23(5):1001–1008.
22.
GiffordRobertNilssonAndreas. 2014. “Personal and Social Factors that Influence Pro-environmental Concern and Behavior.” International Journal of Psychology94(3):141–57.
23.
GilleyBruce. 2012. “Authoritarian Environmentalism and China’s Response to Climate Change.” Environmental Politics21(2):287–307.
24.
GivensJennifer E.JorgensonAndrew K.2013. “Individual Environmental Concern in the World Polity: A Multilevel Analysis.” Social Science Research42(2):418–31.
25.
GrantDonVasiIon B.2016. “Civil Society in an Age of Environmental Accountability.” Sociological Forum32(1):94–115.
26.
GuerinDanielCreteJeanMercierJean. 2001. “A Multilevel Analysis of the Determinants of Recycling Behavior in the European Countries.” Social Science Research30(2):195–218.
27.
HaoFeng. 2014. “The Effect of Economic Affluence and Ecological Degradation on Chinese Environmental Concern: A Multilevel Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences4(2):123–31.
28.
HaoFeng. 2016. “A Panel Regression Study on Multiple Predictors of Environmental Concern for 82 Countries across 7 Years.” Social Science Quarterly97(5):991–1004.
29.
HaoFeng. 2017. “A Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Anthropogenic Drivers of Environmental Impact for 30 Chinese Provinces across Three Regions between 1997 and 2009.” Social Thought and Research34:59–84.
30.
HaoFengHeGuizhenSnipesMichael. 2018. “A Comparative Study of the Economy’s Environmental Impact between States in the United States and Provinces in China.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences8:132-141.
31.
HuLi-tzeBentlerPeter M.1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Model6(1):1–55.
32.
InglehartRonald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers. 2017. “World Vehicles in Use—All Vehicles.” Retrieved July19, 2017 (http://www.oica.net/).
35.
JamelskeEricBoulterJamesJangWonBarrettJamesMillerLaurieLihanWen. 2015 “Examining Differences in Public Opinion on Climate Change between College Students in China and the USA.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences5(2):87–98.
36.
JorgensonAndrewGivensJennifer. 2014. “Economic Globalization and Environmental Concern: A Multilevel Analysis of Individuals within 37 Nations.” Environment & Behavior46(7):848–71.
37.
KangHai-YongSchoenungJulie M.2005. “Electronic Waste Recycling: A Review of U.S. Infrastructure and Technology Options.” Resources, Conservation & Recycling45(4):368–400.
38.
KnightKyle W.MesserBenjamin L.2012. “Environmental Concern in Cross-national Perspective: The Effects of Affluence, Environmental Degradation, and World Society.” Social Science Quarterly93(2):521–37.
39.
KrausStephen J.1995. “Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21(1):58–76.
40.
KvaløyBeritFinseraasHenningListhaugOla. 2012. “The Publics’ Concern for Global Warming: A Cross-national Study of 47 Countries.” Journal of Peace Research49(1):11–22.
41.
LiuXinshengVedlitzAmoldShiLiu. 2014. “Examining the Determinants of Public Environmental Concern: Evidence from National Public Surveys.” Environmental Science & Policy39:77–94.
42.
LiuXinshengMuRen. 2016. “Public Environmental Concern in China: Determinants and Variations.” Global Environmental Change37:116–127.
43.
Marquart-PyattSandra T.2007. “Concern for the Environment among General Publics: A Cross-national Study.” Society & Natural Resources20(10):883–98.
44.
Marquart-PyattSandra T.2008. “Are There Similar Influences on Environmental Concern? Comparing Industrialized Countries.” Social Science Quarterly89(4):1–24.
45.
Marquart-PyattSandra T.2012. “Contextual Influences on Environmental Concerns Cross-nationally: A Multilevel Investigation.” Social Science Research41(5):1085–99.
46.
MohaiPaulSimõesSolangeBrechinSteven R.2010. “Environmental Concerns, Values and Meanings in the Beijing and Detroit Metropolitan Areas.” International Sociology25(6):778–817.
47.
MolArthur P. J.2006. “Environment and Modernity in Transitional China: Frontiers of Ecological Modernization.” Development and Change37(1):29–56.
48.
MorrenMeikeGrinsteinAmir. 2015. “Explaining Environmental Behavior across Borders: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology47:91–106.
49.
NolanJessica M.SchultzP. WesleyCialdiniRobert B.GoldsteinNoah J.GriskevicusVladas. 2008. “Normative Social Influence Is Underdetected.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34(7):913–23.
50.
OregShaulKatz-GerroTally. 2006. “Predicting Proenvironmental Behavior Cross-nationally: Values, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and Value-belief-norm Theory.” Environment & Behavior38(4):462–83.
51.
PaçoArmindaLavradorTania. 2017. “Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes and Behaviors towards Energy Consumption.” Journal of Environmental Management197:384–92.
ShiHaixiaWangShanyongZhaoDingtao. 2017. “Exploring Urban Resident’s Vehicular PM2.5 Reduction Behavior Intention: An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Cleaner Production147:603–13.
54.
SmithTom W.MarsdenPeter V.HoutMichael. 2010. General Social Surveys, 1972-2010: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
55.
SoyezKatja. 2012. “How National Cultural Values Affect Pro-environmental Behavior.” International Marketing Review29(6):623–46.
56.
SummersNikVanHeuvelenTom. 2017. “Heterogeneity in the Relationship between Country-level Affluence and Environmental concern.” Social Forces96(1):329–60.
57.
SwimJanet K.BeckerJulia C.2012. “Country Contexts and Individuals’ Climate Change Mitigating Behaviors: A Comparison of U.S. versus German Individuals’ Efforts to Reduce Energy Use.” Journal of Social Issues68(3):571–91.
58.
TanaMei-PoKwanChaiYanwei. 2016. “Urban Form, Car Ownership and Activity Space in Inner Suburbs: A Comparison between Beijing (China) and Chicago (United States).” Urban Studies53(9):1784–1802.
59.
TiltBryan. 2010. The Struggle for Sustainability in Rural China: Environmental Values and Civil Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
60.
WangPingLiuQianQiYu. 2014. “Factors Influencing Sustainable Consumption Behaviors: A Survey of the Rural Residents in China.” Journal of Cleaner Production63:152–65.
61.
WangX. C.JinP. K.2006. “Water Shortage and Needs for Wastewater Re-use in the North China.” Water Science & Technology53(9):35–44.
62.
WellerRobert P.2006. Discovering Nature: Globalization and Environmental Culture in China and Taiwan. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
63.
World Resource Institute. 2014. Climate Analysis Indicators Tool: WRI’s Climate Data Explorer. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
64.
XiaoChenyangDunlapRiley E.HongDayong. 2013. “The Nature and Bases of Environmental Concern among Chinese Citizens.” Social Science Quarterly94(3):672–90.
65.
XiaoChenyangHongDayong. 2017. “Gender Differences in Environmental Behaviors among the Chinese Public: Model of Mediation and Moderation.” Environment & Behavior. Published electronically August23. doi:10.1177/0013916517723126.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
