Research on the Tea Party emphasizes the role of Fox News in magnifying the movement’s early successes. Fox News is credited with legitimizing the Tea Party’s grievances, allowing the movement to make rapid inroads into the Republican Party. We argue that such depictions of the Tea Party’s relationship to the Republican Party are at least partially the product of an oversimplified media narrative emphasizing the seamless integration of the two. We analyze 201,678 media documents from blog posts from Tea Party organizations, Fox News, MSNBC, and 785 newspapers. Our results show marked differences between how the Tea Party frames itself compared with other media sources frame the movement. MSNBC and Fox News discuss the Tea Party strategically, respectively, treating the movement as representing the worst and best aspects of the Republican Party. This is in stark contrast to how the activists frame the movement as conservative, but not strictly Republican, and often in conflict with the goals of the Republican Party.
AlmeidaPaulVan DykeNella. 2014. “Social Movement Partyism and the Tea Party’s Rapid Mobilization.” Pp. 55–72 in Understanding the Tea Party Movement, edited by Van DykeNellaMeyerDavid S.Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
2.
ArunR.SureshV.Veni MadhavanC. E.Narasimha MurthyM. N.2010. “On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some Observations.” Pp. 391–402 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3.
AtkinsonMary LaytonLovettJohnBaumgartnerFrank R.2014. “Measuring the Media Agenda.” Political Communication31(2):355–80.
4.
BakshyEytanMessingSolomonAdamicLada A.2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science348(6239):1130–32.
5.
BanerjeeTarun. 2013. “Media, Movements, and Mobilization: Tea Party Protests in the United States, 2009–2010.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change36:39–75.
6.
BarrancoJoséWislerDominique. 1999. “Validity and Systematicity of Newspaper Data in Event Analysis.” European Sociological Review15(3):301–22.
7.
BarretoMatt A.CooperBetsy L.GonzalezBenjaminParkerChristopher S.TowlerChristopher. 2011. “The Tea Party in the Age of Obama: Mainstream Conservatism or Out-group Anxiety?” Political Power and Social Theory22:105–37.
8.
BaumMatthew A.GroelingTim. 2008. “New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse.” Political Communication25(4):345–65.
BoykoffJulesLascheverEulalie. 2011. “The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media.” Social Movement Studies10(4):341–66.
11.
BrownHeath. 2015. The Tea Party Divided: The Hidden Diversity of a Maturing Movement. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
12.
CaoJuanXiaTianLiJintaoZhangYongdongTangSheng. 2009. “A Density-based Method for Adaptive LDA Model Selection.” Neurocomputing72(7):1775–81.
13.
DagnesAlison. 2010. Politics on Demand: The Effects of 24-hour News on American Politics. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
14.
DavenportChristian. 2009. Media Bias, Perspective, and State Repression: The Black Panther Party. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DeveaudRomainSanJuanEricBellotPatrice. 2014. “Accurate and Effective Latent Concept Modeling for Ad Hoc Information Retrieval.” Document Numérique17(1):61–84.
16.
DiMaggioAnthony R.2011. The Rise of the Tea Party: Political Discontent and Corporate Media in the Age of Obama. New York: New York University Press.
17.
DiMaggioPaulNagManishBleiDavid. 2013. “Exploiting Affinities between Topic Modeling and the Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Government Arts Funding.” Poetics41(6):570–606.
18.
EntmanRobert M.2007. “Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power.” Journal of Communication57(1):163–73.
19.
FeinererIngoHornikKurtMeyerDavid. 2008. “Text Mining Infrastructure in R.” Journal of Statistical Software25(5):1–54.
20.
FeldmanRonen. 2013. “Techniques and Applications for Sentiment Analysis.” Communications of the ACM56(4):82–89.
21.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica78(1):35–71.
22.
GervaisBryan T.MorrisIrwin L.2012. “Reading the Tea Leaves: Understanding Tea Party Caucus Membership in the US House of Representatives.” PS: Political Science & Politics45(2):245–50.
23.
GroelingTim. 2013. “Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.” Annual Review of Political Science16(1):129–51.
24.
GrünBettinaHornikKurt. 2011. “Topicmodels: An R Package for Fitting Topic Models.” Journal of Statistical Software40(13):1–30.
25.
HackerJacob S.PiersonPaul. 2006. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
HowardPhilip N.2010. The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
JamiesonKathleen HallCappellaJoseph N.2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
JasnyLorienWaggleJosephFisherDana R.2015. “An Empirical Examination of Echo Chambers in US Climate Policy Networks.” Nature Climate Change5(8):782–86.
29.
JurafskyDanMartinJames H.2009. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
KarpfDavid. 2008. “Understanding Blogspace.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics5(4):369–85.
31.
KarpowitzChristopher F.MonsonJ. QuinPattersonKelly D.PopeJeremy C.2011. “Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics44(2):303–309.
32.
MadestamAndreasShoagDanielVeugerStanYanagizawa-DrottDavid. 2013. “Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics128(4):1633–85.
33.
MarcusMitchell P.MarcinkiewiczMary AnnSantoriniBeatrice. 1993. “Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank.” Computational Linguistics19(2):313–30.
34.
McCarthyJohn D.RafailPatrickKimHyun WooReuningKevin. 2016. “The Tea Party Movement’s Short Romance with Annual Protest Demonstrations.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Seattle, WA.
35.
McCarthyJohn D.TitarenkoLarissaMcPhailClarkRafailPatrickAugustynBoguslaw. 2008. “Assessing Stability in the Patterns of Selection Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Protest during the Transition from Communism in Belarus.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly13(2):127–46.
36.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L.1972. “The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly36(2):176–87.
37.
MohammadSaif M.TurneyPeter D.2013. “Crowdsourcing a Word-emotion Association Lexicon.” Computational Intelligence29(3):436–65.
38.
MorinDavid T.FlynnMark A.2014. “We Are the Tea Party! The Use of Facebook as an Online Political Forum for the Construction and Maintenance of In-group Identification during the ‘GOTV’ Weekend.” Communication Quarterly62(1):115–33.
39.
MorrisJonathan S.FranciaPeter L.2010. “Cable News, Public Opinion, and the 2004 Party Conventions.” Political Research Quarterly63(4):834–49.
40.
MortSébastien. 2012. “Tailoring Dissent on the Airwaves: The Role of Conservative Talk Radio in the Right-wing Resurgence of 2010.” New Political Science34(4):485–505.
41.
MurphyKevin P.2012. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
MyersDaniel J.CanigliaBeth Schaefer. 2004. “All the Rioting that’s Fit to Print: Selection Effects in National Newspaper Coverage of Civil Disorders, 1968-1969.” American Sociological Review69(4):519–43.
OliverPamela E.MyersDaniel J.1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events.” American Journal of Sociology105(1):38–87.
45.
R Development Core Team. 2016. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Retrieved February2, 2018 (http://www.R-project.org/).
46.
RafailPatrickWalkerEdward T.McCarthyJohn D.2015. “Protests on the Front Page Media Salience, Institutional Dynamics, and Coverage of Collective Action in the New York Times, 1960-1995.” Communication Research. Published electronically October18. doi:10.1177/0093650215608239.
47.
RodriguezManuel GomezLeskovecJureSchölkopfBernhard. 2012. “Structure and Dynamics of Information Pathways in Online Media.” ArXiv:1212.1464 [Physics]. Retrieved February2, 2018 (http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.1464).
48.
RohlingerDeana A.BunnageLeslie. 2017. “Did the Tea Party Movement Fuel the Trump-train? The Role of Social Media in Activist Persistence and Political Change in the 21st Century.” Social Media & Society3(2): 1-11. doi:10.1177/2056305117706786.
49.
RohlingerDeana A.KleinJesse. 2014. “From Fervor to Fear: ICT and Emotions in the Tea Party Movement.” Pp. 125–48 in Understanding the Tea Party Movement, edited by Van DykeNellaMeyerDavid S.Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
50.
SchudsonMichael. 2001. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism2(2):149–70.
51.
SeguinCharles. 2016. “Cascades of Coverage: Dynamics of Media Attention to Social Movement Organizations.” Social Forces94:997–1020.
52.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.2013. Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
53.
SkocpolThedaWilliamsonVanessa. 2011. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
SmithJackieMcCarthyJohn D.McPhailClarkAugustynBoguslaw. 2001. “From Protest to Agenda Building: Description Bias in Media Coverage of Protest Events in Washington, D.C.” Social Forces79(4):1397–1423.
55.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133–55 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisAldon D.MuellerCarol McClurg. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
SobierajSarah. 2011. Soundbitten: The Perils of Media-centered Political Activism. New York, NY: New York University Press.
57.
SobierajSarahBerryJeffrey M.2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication28(1):19–41.
58.
StreetPaul L.DiMaggioAnthony R.2012. “Beyond the Tea Party: Dismal Democrats, Radical Republicans, Debt Ceiling Drama, and the Long Right Tilt in the Age of Obama.” Critical Sociology38(4):549–63.
59.
StreetPaul L.DiMaggioAnthony R.2015. Crashing the Tea Party: Mass Media and the Campaign to Remake American Politics. New York: Routledge.
60.
StroudNatalie Jomini. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior30(3):341–66.
61.
TuchmanGaye. 1978. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
62.
WalgraveStefaanVan AelstPeter. 2006. “The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.” Journal of Communication56(1):88–109.
63.
WeaverDavid A.ScaccoJoshua M.2013. “Revisiting the Protest Paradigm the Tea Party as Filtered through Prime-time Cable News.” The International Journal of Press/Politics18(1):61–84.
64.
WilliamsonVanessaSkocpolThedaCogginJohn. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics9(1):25–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
