This ethnographic study focuses on how men and women chemistry graduate students are socialized to “do masculinity” differently in scientific contexts. Using results from nine months of observation and 40 semistructured interviews from five labs at a research-intensive university, I argue that the link between men, science, and academia may allow men, but not women, graduate students leeway in establishing their claim to scientific authority. Thus, men graduate students may be able to perform gender in more varied and complex ways than their women peers. In contrast, women graduate students, who do not embody masculinity, may feel more pressure to conform to the strict norms of competition that are associated with traditional masculinity.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.”Gender & Society4(2):139–58.
2.
AinsworthSusanBattyAlexBurchielliRosaria. 2014. “Women Constructing Masculinity in Voluntary Firefighting.”Gender, Work & Organization21(1):37–56.
3.
AustinAnn E.2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career.”The Journal of Higher Education73(1):94–122.
4.
BabbieEarl R.2009. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
5.
BenschopYvonneBrounsMargo. 2003. “Crumbling Ivory Towers: Academic Organizing and Its Gender Effects.”Gender, Work & Organization10(2):194–212.
6.
BirdSharon R.2011. “Unsettling Universities’ Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-Study Approach.”Gender, Work & Organization18(2):202–30.
7.
Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
ConefreyTheresa. 1997. “Gender, Culture and Authority in a University Life Sciences Laboratory.”Discourse & Society8(3):313–40.
9.
ConnellR. W.1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. California: Stanford University Press.
10.
ConnellR. W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJames W.2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.”Gender & Society19(6):829–59.
12.
CrossSusan E.MadsonLaura. 1997. “Models of the Self: Self-construals and Gender.”Psychological Bulletin122(1):5–37.
13.
DoingPark. 2004. “‘Lab Hands’ and the ‘Scarlet O’: Epistemic Politics and (Scientific) Labor.”Social Studies of Science34(3):299–323.
14.
DonaldsonMike. 1993. “What Is Hegemonic Masculinity?”Theory and Society22(5):643–57.
15.
EganJanet Malenchek. 1989. “Graduate School and the Self: A Theoretical View of Some Negative Effects of Professional Socialization.”Teaching Sociology17(2):200–207.
16.
EmersonRobert M.FretzRachel I.ShawLinda L.1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Illinois: University Of Chicago Press.
17.
EtzkowitzHarryKemelgorCarolUzziBrian. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FerreiraMaria. 2003. “Gender Issues Related to Graduate Student Attrition in Two Science Departments.”International Journal of Science Education25(8):969–89.
19.
FletcherJoyce. 1999. Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
FrancisBecky. 2010. “Re/theorising Gender: Female Masculinity and Male Femininity in the Classroom?”Gender and Education22(5):477–90.
21.
HalberstamJudith. 1998. Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
22.
Harvey WingfieldA.2009. “Racializing the Glass Escalator: Reconsidering Men’s Experiences with Women’s Work.”Gender & Society23(1):5–26.
23.
HillCatherineCorbettChristianneSt. RoseAndresse. 2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: The American Association of University Women.
24.
HirshfieldLaura E.2011. “Authority, Expertise, and Impression Management: Gendered Professionalization of Chemists in the Academy.” PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
25.
HirshfieldLaura E.2014. “‘She’s Not Good with Crying’: The Effect of Gender Norms on Graduate Students’ Assessments of Their Principal Investigators.”Gender and Education26(6):601–17.
26.
HirshfieldLaura E.Forthcoming. “‘I Don’t Know Everything, but Ethan Would Know’: Interactional Style, Expertise, and the Cultural Mismatch for Women Scientists.”NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education.
27.
KellerEvelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. Binghamton, NY: Yale University Press.
28.
LincolnAnne E.2010. “The Shifting Supply of Men and Women to Occupations: Feminization in Veterinary Education.”Social Forces88(5):1969–98.
29.
LincolnAnne E.PincusStephanieKosterJanet BandowsLeboyPhoebe S.2012. “The Matilda Effect in Science: Awards and Prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s.”Social Studies of Science42(2):307–20.
30.
LincolnYvonna S.GubaEgon G.1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
31.
MarkusHazel RoseKitayamaShinobu. 1991. “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.”Psychological Review98(2):224–53.
32.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 1998. “Why Can’t a Man be More Like a Woman? Reflections on Connell’s Masculinities.”Gender & Society12(4):472–74.
33.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 2003. “‘Said and Done’ Versus ‘Saying and Doing’: Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work.”Gender & Society17(3):342–66.
34.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 2004. “Gender as Social Institution.”Social Forces82(4):1249–73.
35.
MertonRobert King. 1957. The Student-Physician; Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
PaechterCarrie. 2006. “Masculine Femininities/Feminine Masculinities: Power, Identities and Gender.”Gender and Education18(3):253–63.
38.
PaechterCarrie. 2009. “Response to Mary Lou Rasmussen’s ‘Beyond Gender Identity.’” Gender and Education21(4):449–53.
39.
ProkosAnastasiaPadavicIrene. 2002. “‘There Oughtta Be a Law against Bitches’: Masculinity Lessons in Police Academy Training.”Gender, Work & Organization9(4):439–59.
40.
RhotonLaura A.2011. “Distancing as a Gendered Barrier: Understanding Women Scientists’ Gender Practices.”Gender & Society25(6):696–716.
41.
RidgewayCecilia L.2001. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.”Journal of Social Issues57(4):637–55.
42.
RidgewayCecilia L.2009. “Framed before We Know It: How Gender Shapes Social Relations.”Gender & Society23(2):145–60.
43.
RidgewayCecilia L.Smith-LovinLynn. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.”Annual Review of Sociology25(1):191–216.
44.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2000. “Limiting Inequality through Interaction: The End(s) of Gender.”Contemporary Sociology29(1):110–20.
45.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.”Gender & Society18(4):510–31.
46.
RismanBarbara J.2004. “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.”Gender & Society18(4):429–50.
47.
RudmanLaurie A.PhelanJulie E.2008. “Backlash Effects for Disconfirming Gender Stereotypes in Organizations.”Research in Organizational Behavior28:61–79.
48.
SalleeMargaret W.2011. “Performing Masculinity: Considering Gender in Doctoral Student Socialization.”The Journal of Higher Education82(2):187–216.
49.
SandbergSheryl. 2013. Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
50.
SchiebingerLonda. 1999. Has Feminism Changed Science?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
SonnenwaldDiane H.2007. “Scientific Collaboration.”Annual Review of Information Science14(1):643–81.
52.
SpragueJoeyMassoniKelley. 2005. “Student Evaluations and Gendered Expectations: What We Can’t Count Can Hurt Us.”Sex Roles53(11–12):779–93.
53.
SteinpreisRhea E.AndersKatie A.RitzkeDawn. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.”Sex Roles41(7–8):509–28.
54.
TierneyWilliam G.1997. “Organizational Socialization in Higher Education.”The Journal of Higher Education68(1):1–16.
55.
TillmanLinda C.2001. “Mentoring African American Faculty in Predominantly White Institutions.”Research in Higher Education42(3):295–325.
56.
TraweekSharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
