Doulas are maternity support workers who provide supportive care to women in childbirth. Doulas do not have medical training, yet they offer an important but underused type of expertise. Certification is not required for work as a doula. This study analyzes the role of certification in legitimating doulas’ alternative knowledge about childbirth. Do doulas believe that certification matters for establishing their work as legitimate to mothers and/or to medical clinicians? Certification allows physicians to practice medicine, lawyers to practice law, and teachers to educate students. Why do some doulas get certified by national or international organizations while others do not? To explore these questions, this article uses narrative data from 25 interviews with doulas in the southwestern United States. The majority of these doulas (80 percent) had completed or were in the process of completing their certification. Results indicate that although doulas believe that experience providing support is their primary source of knowledge and defines their expertise among clients, many also argue that certification makes their role legitimate to medical clinicians. Recent changes in health care may give doulas greater access to women most in need of their care, but certification could play a crucial role in gaining this access.
AbbottAndrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbendGabriel. 2006. “Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. Pursuit of Truth.” Sociological Theory62:857–82.
3.
American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014. “Questions and Answers for the Public and Medical Organizations.” American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Retrieved August4, 2014 (http://www.abog.org/faq.asp
BarkerKristin K.2008. “Electronic Support Groups, Patient-consumers, and Medicalization: The Case of Contested Illness.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior49(1):20–36.
7.
BasileMonica Reese. 2012. “Reproductive Justice and Childbirth Reform: Doulas as Agents of Social Change.” PhD dissertation, Department of Women’s Studies, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
8.
BreigerRonald L.2002. “Writing (and Quantifying) Sociology.” Pp. 90–112 in Writing and Revising the Disciplines, edited by MonroeJonathan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
ChildersJulie K.2004. “Achieving a Beautiful Birth: Holistic, Feminist, and Medical Discourse in a Free-standing Birth Center.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Boston College, Boston, MA.
10.
CollinsHarry M.EvansRobert. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science32:235–96.
11.
ConradPeter. 2005. “The Shifting Engines of Medicalization.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior46(1):3–14.
Davis-FloydRobbie. [1992] 2003. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
Davis-FloydRobbieBarclayLesleyTrittenJanDavissBetty-Anne, eds. 2009. Birth Models that Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Davis-FloydRobbieSargentCarolyn Fishel. 1997. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-cultural Perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
DeclerqEugene R. Carol SakalaCoryMaureen P.ApplebaumSandraHerrlichAriel. 2013. Listening to Mothers III: Pregnancy and Birth. New York: Childbirth Connection.
EpsteinSteven. 1998. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
EyalGilBuchholzLarissa. 2010. “From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions.” Annual Review of Sociology36:117–37.
22.
FlammBruce L.BerwickDonald M.KabcenellAndrea. 1998. “Reducing Cesarean Section Rates Safely: Lessons from a ‘Breakthrough Series’ Collaborative.” Birth25:117–24.
23.
FrickelScottGrossNeil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review70:204–32.
24.
FuchsVictor R.2012. “Major Trends in the U.S. Health Economy since 1950.” The New England Journal of Medicine366:973–77.
25.
GemmelDavid J.2002. “Association of Temporal Variations and Hospital Ownership with Cesarean Sections.” PhD dissertation, Department of Health Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH.
26.
GierynThomas F.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: AldineTransaction.
30.
GoerHenci. 1999. The Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth. New York: Berkeley Publishing Group.
31.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.
32.
GordonNancy P.WaltonDavidMcAdamEileenDermanJudyGalliteroGinaGarrettLynda. 1999. “Effects of Providing Hospital-based Doulas in Health Maintenance Organization Hospitals.” Obstetrics & Gynecology93:422–26.
33.
GuestGregBunceArwenJohnsonLaura. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods18:59–82.
34.
HansardKicki. 2012. “Compassion and Empathy—A Doula’s Best Friends.” Midwifery Today101:69.
35.
HodnettEllen D.GatesSimonHofmeyrG. JustusSakalaCarolWestonJulie. 2012. “Continuous Support for Women during Childbirth (Review).” in The Cochrane Collaboration. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retreived August25, 2014 from (http://childbirthconnection.org/pdfs/CochraneDatabaseSystRev.pdf).
36.
HofmeyrG. JustusNikodemCheryl V.WolmanWendy-LynneChalmersBeverley E.KramerTami. 1991. “Companionship to Modify the Clinical Birth Environment: Effects on Progress and Perceptions of Labour, and Breastfeeding.” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology98:756–764.
37.
JohnsonCathrynDowdTimothy J.RidgewayCecilia L.1996. “Legitimacy as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology32:53–78.
38.
JordanBrigetteDavis-FloydRobbie. 1993. Birth in Four Cultures: A Crosscultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden, and the United States. 4th ed.Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
KeelerEmmett B.BrodieMarc. 1993. “Economic Incentives in the Choice between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section.” The Milbank Quarterly71:365–404.
41.
KennellJohnKlausMarshall. 1991. “Continuous Emotional Support during Labor in a US Hospital.” Journal of the American Medical Association265:2197–201.
42.
KlausMarshall H.KennellJohn H.KlausPhyllis H.[1993] 2012. The Doula Book: How a Trained Labor Companion Can Help You Have a Shorter, Easier, and Healthier Birth. 3rd ed.Boston, MA: Da Capo Lifelong Books.
43.
Knorr-CetinaKarin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
LamontMichelle. 1987. “How to Become a Dominant French Philosopher: The Case of Jacques Derrida.” American Journal of Sociology93:584–622.
45.
LeaheyErin. 2008. “Methodological Memes and Mores: Toward a Sociology of Social Research.” Annual Review of Sociology34:33–53.
46.
LeavittJudith Waltzer. 1986. Brought to Bed: Childbearing in America, 1750 to 1950. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
LightDonald W. 2010. “Health-care Professions, Markets and Countervailing Powers.” Pp. 270–89 in Handbook of Medical Sociology Sixth Edition, edited by BirdC. E.ConradP.FremontA. M.TimmermansS.Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
48.
LivelyKathryn J.2001. “Occupational Claims to Professionalism: The Case of Paralegals.” Symbolic Interactionism24(3):343–66.
49.
MartinGraham P.CurrieGraemeFinnRachel2009. “Reconfiguring or Reproducing Intra-professional Boundaries? Specialist Expertise, Generalist Knowledge and the ‘Modernization’ of the Medical Workforce.” Social Science & Medicine68:1191–198.
50.
McGrathSusan K.KennellJohn H.2008. “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous Labor Support for Middle-class Couples: Effect on Cesarean Delivery Rates.” Birth35:92–97.
51.
MeltzerBari. 2004. “Paid Labor: Labor Support Doulas and the Institutional Control of Birth.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Social Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
52.
Minnesota State Plan Amendment. 2014. 1407 U.S.C. § 20. Effective July 1, 2014.
53.
MortonChristineCliftElayne. 2014. Birth Ambassadors: Doulas and the Re-emergence of Woman-supported Birth in America. Amarillo, Texas: Praeclarus Press.
54.
National Council of State Boards of Nursing. 2011. “Licensure of Nurses: An Integral Part of Public Protection.” National Council of State Boards of Nursing. Retrieved August25, 2014 (https://www.ncsbn.org/LicensureofNurses_Aug2011.pdf).
55.
NormanBari MeltzerRothmanBarbara Katz. 2007. “The New Arrival.” Pp. 251-282 in Laboring On: Birth in Transition in the United States, edited by SimondsW.RothmanB. K.NormanB. M.New York: Routlsedge.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
58.
ParsonTalcott. 1939. “The Professions and Social Structure.” Social Forces17(4):457–67.
59.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 2010a. 42 U.S.C. § 18001.
ReayMike. 2007. “Academic Knowledge and Expert Authority in American Economics.” Sociological Perspectives50:101–29.
64.
ReichAdam. 2012. “Disciplined Doctors: The Electronic Medical Record and Physicians’ Changing Relationship to Medical Knowledge.” Social Science & Medicine74(7):1021–28.
65.
RothmanRobert A.1997. “Professions and Professionalization.” Pp. 153–72 in Working: Sociological Perspectives. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson.
66.
SchiebingerLonda. 1989. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
SchofieldLindaSimpsonKathleen RiceAdkins-BleyKarenWilsonJaneBrennanKristen J.2010. Guidelines for Professional Registered Nurse Staffing for Perinatal Units. Washington, DC: Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN).
68.
ShapinSteven. 1995. “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology21:289–321.
69.
SimkinPenny. 1991. “Just Another Day in a Woman’s Life? Women’s Long-term Perceptions of Their First Birth Experience.” Birth18:203–210.
70.
SimondsWendyRothmanBarbara KatzNormanBari Meltzer. 2007. Laboring On: Birth in Transition in the United States. New York: Routledge.
71.
SosaRobertoKennellJohnKlausMarshallRobertsonStevenUrrutiaJuan. 1980. “The Effect of a Supportive Companion on Perinatal Problems, Length of Labor, and Mother-infant Interaction.” The New England Journal of Medicine303:597–600.
72.
StarrPaul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.
73.
StrykerRobin S.1994. “Rules, Resources, and Legitimacy Processes: Some Implications for Social Conflict, Order, and Change.” American Journal of Sociology99:847–910.
74.
SullivanDeborah A.WeitzRose. 1988. Labor Pains: Modern Midwives and Home Birth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
75.
SwidlerAnnArditiJorge. 1994. “The New Sociology of Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology20:305–29.
76.
TimmermansStefanOhHyeyoung. 2010. “The Continued Social Transformation of the Medical Profession.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior52(1):94–106.
77.
TruebaGuadalupeContrerasCarlosVelazcoMaria TeresaLaraEnrique GarcíaMartínezHugo B.2000. “Alternative Strategy to Decrease Cesarean Section: Support by Doulas during Labor.” Journal of Perinatal Education9:8–13.
78.
VolviRudi. 2012. An Introduction to the Sociology of Work and Occupations. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
79.
WeitzRobert. [2000] 2012. Psycho-economics: Managed Care in Mental Health in the New Millennium. New York: Routledge.
80.
WhitleyRichard. 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
