College students’ “hookups” have been the subject of a great deal of research in recent years. Motivations for hooking up have been linked to differences in well-being after the hookup, but studies detailing college students’ motivations for engaging in hookups focus on single motivations. Using data from the 2010 Duke Hookup Survey, we consider how motivations for hooking up cluster to produce different classes, or profiles, of students who hook up, and how these classes are related to hookup regret. Four distinct classes of motivations emerged from our latent class analysis: Utilitarians (50 percent), Uninhibiteds (27 percent), Uninspireds (19 percent), and Unreflectives (4 percent). We find a number of differences in hookup motivation classes across social characteristics, including gender, year in school, race-ethnicity, self-esteem, and attitudes about sexual behavior outside committed relationships. In addition, Uninspireds regret hookups more frequently than members of the other classes, and Uninhibiteds report regret less frequently than Utilitarians and Uninspireds. These findings reveal the complexity of motivations for hooking up and the link between motivations and regret.
ArmstrongElizabeth A.HamiltonLauraEnglandPaula. 2010. “Is Hooking Up Bad for Young Women?” Contexts9(3):22–27.
2.
AxinnWilliam G.ThorntonArland. 1996. “The Influence of Parents’ Marital Dissolu-tions on Children’s Attitudes toward Family Formation.” Demography33(1):66–81.
3.
BogleKathleen A.2008. Hooking up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus. New York: New York University Press.
4.
BourdieuP.1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BurdetteAmy M.EllisonChristopher G.HillTerrence D.GlennNorval D.2009. “‘Hooking Up’ at College: Does Religion Make a Difference?” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion48(3):535–51.
6.
ClarkShaunna L.MuthénBengt. 2009. “Relating Latent Class Analysis Results to Variables Not Included in the Analysis.” Retrieved July28, 2014 (http://statmodel2.com/download/relatinglca.pdf).
7.
CollinsLinda M.LanzaStephanie T.2010. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
8.
CuffeeJuanita J.HallforsDenise D.WallerMartha W.2007. “Racial and Gender Differences in Adolescent Sexual Attitudes and Longitudinal Associations with Coital Debut.” Journal of Adolescent Health41(1):19–26.
9.
DeciEdward L.RyanRichard M.2000. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry11:227–68.
10.
EllingsonStephenLaumannEdward O.PaikAnthonyMahayJenna. 2004. “The Theory of Sex Markets.” Pp. 3–38 in The Sexual Organization of the City, edited by LaumannEdward O.EllingsonStephenMahayJennaPaikAnthonyYoumYoosik. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
EnglandPaulaShaferEmily FitzgibbonsFogartyAlison C. K.2008. “Hooking Up and Forming Romantic Relationships on Today’s College Campuses.” Pp. 531–46 in The Gendered Society Reader, edited by KimmelMichaelAronsonAmy. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
EnglandPaulaThomasReuben J.2006. “The Decline of the Date and the Rise of the College Hookup.” Pp. 151–62 in Families in Transition. 14th ed., edited by SkolnickArlene S.SkolnickJerome H.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
13.
EshbaughElaine M.GuteGary. 2008. “Hookups and Sexual Regret among College Women.” The Journal of Social Psychology148(1):77–90.
14.
FreitasDonna. 2008. Sex and the Soul: Juggling Sexuality, Spirituality, Romance, and Religion on America’s College Campuses. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
GarciaJustinReiberChris. 2008. “Hook-up Behavior: A Biopsychosocial Perspective.” Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology2(4):192–208.
16.
GiddensAnthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
GrazianDavid. 2011. On the Make: The Hustle of Urban Nightlife. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GrelloCatherine M.WelshDeborah P.HarperMelinda S.2006. “No Strings Attached: The Nature of Casual Sex in College Students.” Journal of Sex Research43(3):255–67.
20.
HamiltonLauraArmstrongElizabeth A.2009. “Gendered Sexuality in Young Adulthood Double Binds and Flawed Options.” Gender & Society23(5):589–616.
21.
HatfieldElaineLuckhurstCherieRapsonRichard L.2010. “Sexual Motives: Cultural, Evolutionary, and Social Psychological Perspectives.” Sexuality & Culture14(3):173–90.
22.
Johnson-HanksJennifer A.BachrachChristine A.MorganS. PhilipKohlerHans-Peter. 2011. Understanding Family Change and Variation: Toward a Theory of Conjunctural Action. New York: Springer.
23.
KelleyHarold H.1983. Close Relationships. Clinton Corners, NY: Percheron Press.
24.
LanzaStephanie T.CollinsLinda M.LemmonDavid R.SchaferJoseph L.2007. “PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(4):671–94.
25.
LewisMelissa A.GranatoHollieBlayneyJessica A.LostutterTy W.KilmerJason R.2012. “Predictors of Hooking Up Sexual Behaviors and Emotional Reactions Among U.S. College Students.” Archives of Sexual Behavior41(5):1219-1229.
26.
LiNorman P.KenrickDouglas T.2006. “Sex Similarities and Differences in Preferences for Short-term Mates: What, Whether, and Why.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(3):468–89.
27.
LyonsHeidi A.ManningWendy D.LongmoreMonica A.GiordanoPeggy C.2014. “Young Adult Casual Sexual Behavior: Life-course-specific Motivations and Consequences.” Sociological Perspectives57:79–101.
28.
ManthosMeganOwenJesseFinchamFrank D.2013. “A New Perspective on Hooking Up among College Students: Sexual Behavior as a Function of Distinct Groups.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships31(6):815-829.
29.
MasseyDouglas S.CharlesCamille Z.LundyGarveyFischerMary J.2011. The Source of the River. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
McClintockElizabeth Aura. 2010. “When Does Race Matter? Race, Sex, and Dating at an Elite University.” Journal of Marriage and Family72(1):45–72.
31.
MorganS. PhilipShanahanSuzanneBrynildsenWendy. 2010. “Hooking Up, Hanging Out and Falling in Love on College Campuses: A Continuing Behavioral Trend?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas, TX.
32.
MuehlenhardCharlene L.PetersonZoë. 2005. “Wanting and Not Wanting Sex: The Missing Discourse of Ambivalence.” Feminism & Psychology15:15–20.
33.
NaginDaniel. 2009. Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
NylundKaren L.AsparouhovTihomirMuthénBengt O.2007. “Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal14(4):535–69.
35.
O’SullivanLucia F.GainesMichelle E.1998. “Decision-making in College Stu-dents’ Heterosexual Dating Relationships: Ambivalence about Engaging in Sexual Activity.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships15:347–63.
36.
OswaltSara B.CameronKenzie A.KoobJeffrey J.2005. “Sexual Regret in College Students.” Archives of Sexual Behavior34(6):663–69.
37.
OwenJesse J.RhoadesGalena K.StanleyScott M.FinchamFrank D.2010. “‘Hooking Up’ among College Students: Demographic and Psychosocial Correlates.” Archives of Sexual Behavior39(3):653–63.
38.
PearceLisa D.ThorntonArland. 2007. “Religious Identity and Family Ideologies in the Transition to Adulthood.” Journal of Marriage and Family69(5):1227–43.
39.
RayRashawnRosowJason A.2010. “Getting Off and Getting Intimate: How Normative Institutional Arrangements Structure Black and White Fraternity Men’s Approaches toward Women.” Men and Masculinities12(5):523–46.
40.
ReganPamela C.DreyerCarla S.1999. “Lust? Love? Status?” Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality11(1):1–24.
41.
RegnerusMark D.2007. Forbidden Fruit: Sex & Religion in the Lives of American Teenagers. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
RosenbergMorris. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
RyanRichard M.ConnellJames P.1989. “Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(5):749–61.
44.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward L.2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being.” American Psychologist55:68–78.
45.
SewellWilliam H.1992. “A Theory of Struc-ture: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology98:1–29.
SmithChristian. 2010. What Is a Person? Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
VrangalovaZhana. 2014. “Does Casual Sex Harm College Students’ Well-being? A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Motivation.” Archives of Sexual Behavior. February5. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1.
49.
WallerWillard. 1937. “The Rating and Dating Com-plex.” American Sociological Review2:727–34.
50.
WeaverShara J.HeroldEdward S.2000. “Casual Sex and Women.” Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality12(3):23–41.
WinshipChristopherMareRobert D.1984. “Regression Models with Ordinal Variables.” American Sociological Review49(4):512–25.
53.
WolfingerNicholas H.2003. “Parental Divorce and Offspring Marriage: Early or Late?” Social Forces82(1):337–53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
