Despite the increasing socioenvironmental controversy over the use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technology in unconventional natural gas development (i.e., fracking), few sociological studies have used citizen interview narratives to examine attitudes toward shale fracking at the local level. Drawing on sociological research, discursive documents, and in-depth interview data collected from regional stakeholder groups/citizens, this article offers a qualitative analysis of the environmental disputes and opportunity-threat impacts perceived to surround natural gas exploration and hydraulic fracking in the Haynesville Shale region of Louisiana. The narratives reveal that the fracking dispute largely revolves around divergent diagnostic and prognostic beliefs about shale gas development, as well as whether the perceived economic opportunities of development outweigh the alleged socioenvironmental risks to the Haynesville community. Some conclusions about the utility of qualitative research for the study of environmental controversies like fracking, as well as the potential future direction of the growing national debate over shale gas and oil extraction, are discussed.
AlbrechtStan L.1978. “Socioeconomic Factors and Energy Resource Development in Rural Areas in the West.” Journal of Environmental Management7:73–90.
2.
America’s Natural Gas Alliance. 2013. “Think About It.”Retrieved June 2, 2014 (http://thinkaboutit.org).
3.
AndersonBrooklynn J.TheodoriGene L.2009. “Local Leaders’ Perceptions of Energy Development in the Barnett Shale.” Southern Rural Sociology24(1):113–29.
BenfordRobert D.1993. “Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement.” Social Forces71(3):677–701.
6.
BenfordRobert D.1997. “An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective.” Sociological Inquiry67:409–30.
7.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
8.
BrasierKathryn J.FilteauMatthew R.McLaughlinDiane K.JacquetJeffreyStedmanRichard C.KelseyTimothy W.KelseyStephan W.2011. “Residents’ Perceptions of Community and Environmental Impacts from Development of Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: A Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York Cases.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences26(1):32–61.
9.
BrownRalph B.DoriusShawn F.KrannichRichard S.2005. “The Boom-Bust Recovery Cycle: Dynamics of Change in Community Satisfaction and Social Integration in Delta, Utah.” Rural Sociology70(1):28–49.
10.
BrownRalph B.GeertsenH. ReedKrannichRichard S.1989. “Community Satisfaction and Social Integration in Boomtown: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Rural Sociology54(4):568–86.
EvensenDarrick T.ClarkeChristopher E.StedmanRichard C.2014. “A New York or Pennsylvania State of Mind: Social Representations in Newspaper Coverage of Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science4(1): 65-77.
20.
EisenbergNora. 2010. “A New Generation of Natural Gas Drilling Is Endangering Communities from the Rockies to New York.” The Nation, June22. Retrieved June 23, 2010 (http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/147298).
21.
FinkelMadelon L.LawAdam. 2011. “The Rush to Drill for Natural Gas: A Public Health Cautionary Tale.” American Journal of Public Health101(5):784–85.
22.
Food & Water Watch. 2011. The Case for a Ban on Gas Fracking. Washington, DC: Food & Water Watch.
23.
Food & Water Watch. 2012. Fracking: The New Global Water Crisis. Washington, DC: Food & Water Watch.
24.
Food & Water Watch. 2013. Fracking Colorado: Illusory Benefits, Hidden Costs. Washington, DC: Food & Water Watch.
25.
ForsythCraig J.LuthraAsha D.BankstonWilliam B.2007. “Framing Perceptions of Oil Development and Social Disruption.” The Social Science Journal44:287–99.
26.
FoxJosh. 2010. Gasland. Film Documentary. New York: Wow Productions.
27.
FoxJosh. 2013. Gasland II. Film Documentary. New York: Wow Productions.
28.
FreudenburgWilliam R.1981. “Women and Men in an Energy Boomtown: Adjustment, Alienation, and Adaption.” Rural Sociology46:220–44.
29.
FreudenburgWilliam R.1982. “The Impacts of Rapid Growth on the Social and Personal Well-Being of Local Community Residents.” Pp. 137–70 in Coping with Rapid Growth in Rural Communities, edited by WeberBruce A.HowellRobert E.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
FreudenburgWilliam R.FrickelScott. 1994. “Digging Deeper: Mining-Dependent Regions in Historical Perspective.” Rural Sociology59(2):266–88.
31.
FreudenburgWilliam R.GramlingRobert. 1992. “Community Impacts of Technological Change: Toward a Longitudinal Perspective.” Social Forces70(4):937–55.
32.
FreudenburgWilliam R.GramlingRobert.1993. “Socio-environmental Factors and Development Policy: Understanding Opposition an Support for Offshore Oil.” Sociological Forum8(3):341–65.
33.
FreudenburgWilliam R.GramlingRobert. 1994. “Mid-range Theory and Cutting-Edge Sociology: A Call for Cumulation.” Environment, Technology, and Society76(1):3–6.
34.
FreudenburgWilliam R.GramlingRobert. 2011. Blowout in the Gulf: The BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Future of Energy in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
FrickelScottGrossNeil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review70(2):204–32.
36.
FriedmanThomas L.2012. “Get It Right on Gas.” New York Times, August5, p. 14.
37.
GillDuane A.PicouJ. StevenRitchieLiesel A.2012. “The Exxon Valdez and BP Oil Spills: A Comparison of Initial Social and Psychological Impacts.” American Behavioral Scientist56(1):3–23.
38.
GoldRussell. 2014. The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World. New York: Simon & Schuster.
GramlingRobertBrabantSarah. 1986. “Boom-Towns and Offshore Energy Impact Assessment: The Development of a Comprehensive Model.” Sociological Perspectives2(9):177–201.
42.
GramlingRobertFreudenburgWilliam R.1992. “Opportunity-Threat, Development, and Adaption: Toward a Comprehensive Framework for Social Impact Assessment.” Rural Sociology57(2):216–34.
43.
GramlingRobertFreudenburgWilliam R.2006. “Attitudes toward Offshore Oil Development: A Summary of Current Evidence.” Ocean & Coastal Management49:442–61.
44.
GrayBarbara. 2003. “Framing of Environmental Disputes.” Pp. 11–34 in Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases, edited by LewickiRoy J.GreyBarbaraElliotMichael. Washington, DC: Island Press.
45.
GunterValerieKroll-SmithSteve. 2007. Volatile Places: A Sociology of Communities and Environmental Controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
HudginsAnastasiaPooleAmanda. 2014. “Framing Fracking: Private Property, Common Resources, and Regimes of Governance.” Journal of Political Ecology21(1):303–19.
JalbertKirkKinchyAbby J.PerrySimona L.2014. “Civil Society Research and Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Development: Results of a Survey of Volunteer Water Monitoring Organizations.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science4(1):78–86.
52.
JohnsonErik W.FrickelScott. 2011. “Ecological Threat and the Founding of U.S. National Environmental Movement Organizations, 1962-1998.” Social Problems58(3):305–29.
KinchyAbby J.PerrySimona L.2012. “Can Volunteers Pick Up the Slack? Efforts to Remedy Knowledge Gaps about the Watershed Impacts of Marcellus Shale Gas Development.” Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum22(2):303–39.
55.
KinneBeth E.FinewoodMichael H.YoxtheimerDavix. 2014. “Making Critical Connections through Interdisciplinary Analysis: Exploring the Impacts of Marcellus Shale Development.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences4(1):1–6.
KraussCliffordLiptonEric. 2012. “After the Boom in Natural Gas.” New York Times, October22, pp. 1–5.
58.
KrieskyJ. B. D. GoldsteinZellK.BeachS.2013. “Differing Opinions about Natural Gas Drilling in Two Adjacent Counties with Different Levels of Drilling Activity.” Energy Policy58:228–36.
59.
KrogmanNaomi T.1996. “Frame Disputes in Environmental Controversies: The Case of Wetlands Regulations in Louisiana.” Sociological Spectrum16:371–400.
LaddAnthony E.2011. “Feedlots of the Sea: Movement Frames and Activist Claims in the Protest Over Salmon Farming in the Pacific Northwest.” Humanity & Society35(4):343–75.
62.
LaddAnthony E.2013. “Stakeholder Perceptions of Socio-environmental Impacts from Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the Haynesville Shale.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences28(2):56–89.
63.
LavelleMarianne. 2012. “Bad Gas, Good Gas.” National Geographic222:90–109.
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. 2012. Louisiana Hydraulic Fracturing State Review. Baton Rouge, LA: Office of Conservation, Department of Natural Resources.
MalinStephanie. 2014. “There’s No Real Choice But to Sign: Neoliberalization and Normalization of Hydraulic Fracturing on Pennsylvania Farmland.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science4(1): 17-27.
69.
MallAmy. 2013. “Millions of Acres of Land—Larger than California and Florida Combined—Already Leased to Oil and Gas Industry.” Nation of Change, March4. Retrieved June 16, 2013 (http://www.nationofchange.org/print/36655).
70.
McAdamDougBoudetHilary. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000-2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MesserChris M.AdamsAlison E.ShriverThomas E.2012. “Corporate Frame Failure and the Erosion of Elite Legitimacy.” The Sociological Quarterly53(3):475–99.
MikaMarie. 2006. “Framing the Issue: Religion, Secular Ethics and the Case of Animal Rights Mobilization.” Social Forces85(2):915–41.
75.
MooneyPatrick H.HuntScott A.2009. “Food Security: The Elaboration of Contested Claims to a Consensus Frame.” Rural Sociology74(4):469–97.
76.
NoakesJohn A.JohnstonHank. 2005. “Frames of Protest: A Road Map to a Perspective.” Pp. 1–29 in Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective, edited by JohnstonHankNoakesJohn A.Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
77.
OnishiNorimitsu. 2013. “Fracking Tests Ties between California ‘Oil and Ag’ Interests.” New York Times, June2. p. 11.
78.
PooleAmandaHudginsAnastasia. 2014. “‘I Care More about This Place, because I Fought for It’: Exploring the Political Ecology of Fracking in an Ethnographic Field School.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science4(1):37–46.
79.
PowellRachel. 2011. “Frames and Narratives as Tools for Recruiting and Sustaining Group Members: The Soulforce Equality Ride as a Social Movement Organization.” Sociological Inquiry81(4):454–76.
80.
RobinsonErin. E.2009. “Competing Frames of Environmental Contamination: Influences on Grassroots Community Mobilization.” Sociological Spectrum29:3–27.
SchafftKai A.BorluYetkinGlennaLeland. 2013. “The Relationship between Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Pennsylvania and Local Perceptions of Risk and Opportunity.” Rural Sociology78(2):143–66.
83.
SchleifsteinMark. 2011. “Boomville, Louisiana.” Times-Picayune, March27, pp. A-1, A-8–A-10.
ShriverThomas E.2001. “Environmental Hazards and Veterans’ Framing of Gulf War Illness.” Sociological Inquiry71(4):403–20.
86.
ShriverThomas E.AdamsAlison E.CableSherry. 2013. “Discursive Obstruction and Elite Opposition to Environmental Activism in the Czech Republic.” Social Forces91(3):873–93.
87.
ShriverThomas E.2008. “Mining for Conflict and Staking Claims: Contested Illness at the Tar Creek Superfund Site.” Sociological Inquiry78(4):558–79.
88.
ShriverThomas E.KennedyDennis. 2005. “Contested Environmental Hazards and Community Conflict Over Relocation.” Rural Sociology70(4):491–513.
89.
ShriverThomas E.PeadenCharles. 2009. “Frame Disputes in a Natural Resource Controversy: The Case of the Arbuckle Simpson Aquifer in South-Central Oklahoma.” Society & Natural Resources22:143–57.
90.
ShriverThomas E.WhiteDebbieKebedeAlem Seghed. 1998. “Power, Politics, and the Framing of Environmental Illness.” Sociological Inquiry68(4):458–75.
91.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research1:197–218.
92.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133–55 in Frontiers of Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisAldonMuellerCarol McClung. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
93.
SnowDavid A.RochfordE. BurkeJr.WordenStephen K.BenfordRobert D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51:464–81.
94.
StewardGary A.ShriverThomas R.ChasteenAmy L.2002. “Participant Narratives and Collective Identity in a Metaphysical Movement.” Sociological Spectrum22(1):107–35.
95.
SurgeyNick. 2013. “Environmental Groups Split on Illinois Fracking Bill.” Nation of Change, June6. Retrieved June 7, 2013 (http://www.nationofchange.org/print/38423).
96.
TheodoriGene L.2009. “Paradoxical Perceptions of Problems Associated with Unconventional Natural Gas Development.” Southern Rural Sociology24(3):97–117.
97.
TheodoriGene L.2013. “Perception of the Natural Gas Industry and Engagement in Individual Civic Actions.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences28(2):122–34.
VincentShirley G.ShriverThomas E.2009. “Framing Contests in Environmental Decision-Making: A Case of the Tar Creek (Oklahoma) Superfund Site.” American Journal of Environmental Sciences5(2):164–78.
105.
WeigleJason L.2011. “Resilience, Community, and Perceptions of Marcellus Shale Development in the Pennsylvania Wilds: Reframing the Discussion.” Sociological Viewpoints27:3–14.
106.
WillowAnna J.2014. “The New Politics of Environmental Degradation: Un/Expected Landscapes of Disempowerment and Vulnerability.” Journal of Political Ecology21(1):237–57.
107.
WillowAnna J.ZakRebeccaVilaplanaDanielleSheelyDavid. 2014. “The Contested Landscape of Unconventional Energy Development: A Report from Ohio’s Shale Gas Country.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science4(1):56–64.
108.
WrightSimon. 2012. “An Unconventional Bonanza.” The Economist, July12, pp. 3–15.
109.
WynveenBrooklynn J.2011. “A Thematic Analysis of Local Respondents’ Perceptions of Barnett Shale Energy Development.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences26(1):8–31.
110.
YerginDaniel. 2011. The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World. New York: Penguin Press.
ZebrowskiErnestLeashMariah Zebrowski. 2014. Hydrocarbon Hucksters: Lessons from Louisiana on Oil, Politics, and Environmental Justice. Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press.
