Religion can help people cope with problems, but in the modern U.S. economy, it may also create problems for some women. Conservative Protestantism encourages women to avoid paid work when they have young children, but that is a preference many families cannot afford. To better understand how workplace outcomes may reflect religion, we examine whether conservative Protestant, mainline Protestant, Catholic, and non-religious women work the number of hours they prefer. We pay special attention to the interplay of religion and motherhood. We find that among new mothers, conservative Protestants are among the most likely to wish they were working fewer hours. Non-religious women, in contrast, are the least likely to want fewer hours. Among women who are not new mothers, the situation is reversed. Conservative Protestants are least likely to wish they were working fewer hours and non-religious women are the most likely to want fewer hours. These results suggest that researchers interested in the subjective side of employment should pay more attention to how religion shapes experiences of paid work.
AmmonsSamantha K.EdgellPenny. 2007. “Religious Influences on Work-family Trade-offs.” Journal of Family Issues28:794–826.
2.
BendrothMargaret Lamberts. 1993. Fundamentalism and Gender, 1875 to the Present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
CampbellIainvan WanrooyBrigid. 2013. “Long Working Hours and Working-time Preferences: Between Desirability and Feasibility.” Human Relations66:1131-1155.
4.
ColtraneScott. 2000. “Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work.” Journal of Marriage and Family62:1208–33.
5.
DarnellAlfredSherkatDarren E.1997. “The Impact of Protestant Fundamentalism on Educational Attainment.” American Sociological Review62:306–15.
6.
DragoRobertWoodenMarkBlackDavid. 2009. “Long Work Hours: Volunteers and Conscripts.” British Journal of Industrial Relations47:571–600.
7.
EdgellPenny. 2006. Religion and Family in a Changing Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
EllisonChristopher G.BartkowskiJohn P.2002. “Conservative Protestantism and the Division of Household Labor among Married Couples.” Journal of Family Issues23:950–85.
9.
FinkeRogerStarkRodney. 1992. The Churching of America, 1776-1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
GlassJenniferJacobsJerry. 2005. “Childhood Religious Conservatism and Adult Attainment among Black and White Women.” Social Forces84:555–79.
11.
GlassJenniferNathLeda E.2006. “Religious Conservatism and Women’s Market Behavior Following Marriage and Childbirth.” Journal of Marriage and Family68:611–29.
12.
GlockCharles Y.1964. “The Role of Deprivation in the Origin and Evolution of Religious Groups.” Pp. 24–36 in Religion and Social Conflict, edited by LeeR.MartyM. E.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13.
GoldenLonnieGebreselassieTesfayi. 2007. “Overemployment Mismatches: The Preference for Fewer Work Hours.” Monthly Labor Review130:18–37.
14.
GrantDonO’NeilKathleenStephensLaura. 2004. “Spirituality in the Workplace: New Empirical Directions in the Study of the Sacred.” Sociology of Religion65:265–83.
15.
HallM. Elizabeth LewisOatesKerris L. M.AndersonTamara L.WillinghamMichele M.2012. “Calling and Conflict: The Sanctification of Work in Working Mothers.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality4:71–83.
16.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.
17.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
18.
IannacconeLaurence R.MilesCarrie A.1990. “Dealing with Social Change: The Mormon Church’s Response to Change in Women’s Roles.” Social Forces68:1231–50.
19.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
JacobsonCardell K.1999. “Denominational and Racial and Ethnic Differences in Fatalism.” Review of Religious Research41:9–20.
21.
KeisterLisa A.2003. “Religion and Wealth: The Role of Religious Affiliation and Participation in Early Adult Asset Accumulation.” Social Forces82:175–207.
22.
KeisterLisa A.2007. “Upward Wealth Mobility: Exploring the Roman Catholic Advantage.” Social Forces85:1195–226.
23.
KeisterLisa A.2008. “Conservative Protestants and Wealth: How Religion Perpetuates Asset Poverty.” The American Journal of Sociology113:1237–71.
LehrerEvelyn L.2004. “Religion as a Determinant of Economic and Demographic Behavior in the United States.” Population and Development Review30:707–26.
26.
LynnMonty L.NaughtonMichael J.Vander VeenSteve. 2011. “Connecting Religion and Work: Patterns and Influences of Work-faith Integration.” Human Relations64:675–701.
27.
MacInnesJohn. 2005. “Work-life Balance and the Demand for Reduction in Working Hours: Evidence from the British Social Attitudes Survey 2002.” British Journal of Industrial Relations43:273–95.
28.
MarxKarl. 1978. “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction.” Pp. 53–65 in The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by TuckerR. C.New York: W.W. Norton.
29.
RaleySara B.MattinglyMarybeth J.BianchiSuzanne M.2006. “How Dual Are Dual-income Couples? Documenting Change from 1970 to 2001.” Journal of Marriage and Family68:11–28.
30.
ReadJen’nan Ghazal. 2004. “Family, Religion, and Work among Arab American Women.” Journal of Marriage and Family66:1042–50.
31.
ReynoldsJeremy. 2003. “You Can’t Always Get the Hours You Want: Mismatches between Actual and Preferred Work Hours in the U.S.” Social Forces81:1171–99.
32.
ReynoldsJeremy. 2005. “In the Face of Conflict: Work-family Conflict and Desired Work Hour Adjustments.” Journal of Marriage and Family67:1313–31.
33.
ReynoldsJeremyAletrarisLydia. 2006. “Pursuing Preferences: The Creation and Resolution of Work Hour Mismatches.” American Sociological Review71:618–38.
34.
ReynoldsJeremyJohnsonDavid R.2012. “Don’t Blame the Babies: Work Hour Mismatches and the Role of Children.” Social Forces91:131–55.
35.
RoofWade ClarkMcKinneyWilliam. 1987. American Mainline Religion: Its Changing Shape and Future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
36.
ScheveKennethStasavageDavid. 2006. “Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science1:255–86.
37.
SherkatDarren E.2000. “‘That They Be Keepers of the Home’: The Effect of Conservative Religion on Early and Late Transitions into Housewifery.” Review of Religious Research41:344–58.
38.
SherkatDarren E.DarnellAlfred. 1999. “The Effect of Parents’ Fundamentalism on Children’s Educational Attainment: Examining Differences by Gender and Children’s Fundamentalism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion38:23-35
39.
SherkatDarren E.EllisonChristopher G.1999. “Recent Developments and Current Controversies in the Sociology of Religion.” Annual Review of Sociology25:363–94.
40.
SmithChristian. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
41.
StarkRodney. 1964. “Class, Radicalism, and Religious Involvement in Great Britain.” American Sociological Review29:698–706.
42.
StarkRodneyBainbridgeWilliam Sims. 1985. The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival, and Cult Formation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
StarkRodneyFinkeRoger. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
StarkRodneyIannacconeLaurence R.1994. “A Supply-side Reinterpretation of the ‘Secularization’ of Europe.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion33:230–52.
45.
SteenslandBrianParkJerry Z.RegnerusMark D.RobinsonLynn D.WilcoxW. BradfordWoodberryRobert D.2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces79:291–324.
46.
SteffyKody. 2013. "Religious Orthodoxy and the American Worker."Sociology of Religion74:1-29.
47.
SullivanSusan C.2006. “The Work-faith Connection for Low-income Mothers: A Research Note.” Sociology of Religion67:99–108.
48.
SweetJames A.BumpassLarry L.2002. “The National Survey of Families and Households—Waves 1, 2, and 3: Data Description and Documentation.” Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
49.
TraceyPaul. 2012. “Religion and Organization: A Critical Review of Current Trends and Future Directions.” Academy of Management Annals6:87–134.
50.
UeckerJeremy E.StokesCharles E.2008. “Early Marriage in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and Family70:835–46.
51.
UeckerJeremy E.LuckeGlenn. 2011. “Protestant Clergy and the Culture Wars: An Empirical Test of Hunter’s Thesis.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50:692–706.
52.
WeberMax. 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by ParsonsT.New York: Scribner.
53.
WilliamsRichard. 2012. “Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects.” Stata Journal12:308–31.
54.
WinklerAnne E.1998. “Earnings of Husbands and Wives in Dual-earner Families.” Monthly Labor Review121: 42-48.
55.
WoodenMarkWarrenDianaDragoRobert. 2009. “Working Time Mismatch and Subjective Well-being.” British Journal of Industrial Relations47:147–79.
56.
WuthnowRobert. 1994. God and Mammon in America. New York: Free Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
