Corporations rarely prioritize healthy communities over healthy profit margins, but their profits depend on community acceptance. This article reveals that in their quest to be perceived as legitimate citizens, some corporations co-opt the rhetorical tactics typically associated with social movement organizations to frame their profit-maximizing practices as the solution to the problem of childhood obesity. In this framing, explored here in an ethnography of the activities of two organizations called the Partnership for a Healthier America and the Alliance for a Healthier Generation, obesity is the result of communities’ failure to work together and the cumulative effect of individuals’ bad choices. By framing corporations as vital community partners poised to “work together” across sectors to solve the childhood obesity “crisis,” these organizations hope to inspire the public to participate in this imagined community in one predominant way: by buying their products. Despite the apparent power and reach of their framing, though, these corporations implicitly acknowledge that they are not and cannot be legitimate members of communities unless the public lets them.
AdamsAlison E.ShriverThomas E.2010. “[Un]Common Language: The Corporate Appropriation of Alternative Agro-food Frames.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences25(2):33–57.
AndersonBenedict Richard O’Gorman. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, England: Verso.
6.
AnnanKofi. 2000. “Working Together.” Business in Africa, February.
7.
Anon. N.d. “Food and Beverage Companies Surpass 2015 Goal of Reducing Calories in the U.S. Three Years Ahead Of Schedule.” Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 9, 2013 (http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130530-907707.html).
8.
AntonioRobert J.BrulleRobert J.2011. “The Unbearable Lightness of Politics: Climate Change Denial and Political Polarization.” The Sociological Quarterly52(2):195–202.
9.
ArringtonCharles B.SawayaRichard N.1984. “Managing Public Affairs: Issues Management in an Uncertain Environment.” California Management Review26:148–60.
10.
BenfordRobert D.HuntScott A.2003. “Interactional Dynamics in Public Problems Marketplaces: Movements and the Counterframing and Reframing of Public Problems.” Pp. 153–86 in Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems, edited by HolsteinJames A.MillerGale. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
11.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
12.
BensonPeter. 2012. “Commentary: Biopolitical Injustice and Contemporary Capitalism.” American Ethnologist39(3):488–90.
13.
BestJoel. 1990. Threatened Children: Rhetoric and Concern about Child-victims. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BrunoKennyKarlinerJoshua. 2002. Earthsummit.biz. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
CastelloItziarLozanoJosep M.2011. “Searching for New Forms of Legitimacy through Corporate Responsibility Rhetoric.” Journal of Business Ethics100:11–29.
17.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
CourtemancheCharlesCardenArt. 2011. “Supersizing Supercenters? The Impact of Walmart Supercenters on Body Mass Index and Obesity.” Journal of Urban Economics69(2):165–81.
23.
de BakkerFrank G. A.den HondFrankKingBraydenWeberKlaus. 2013. “Social Movements, Civil Society and Corporations: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead.” Organization Studies34(5–6):573–93.
DuPuisE. Melanie. 2002. Nature’s Perfect Food: How Milk Became America’s Drink. New York: New York University Press.
26.
ElsasserShaun W.DunlapRiley E.2013. “Leading Voices in the Denier Choir: Conservative Columnists’ Dismissal of Global Warming and Denigration of Climate Science.” American Behavioral Scientist57(6):754–76.
GuptillAmy E.CopeltonDenise A.LucalBetsy. 2012. Food and Society: Principals and Paradoxes. New York: Polity.
33.
GuthmanJulieDuPuisMelanie. 2006. “Embodying Neoliberalism: Economy, Culture, and the Politics of Fat.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24:427–48.
34.
HarrisJennifer L.PomerznzJennifer L.LobsteinTimBrownellKelly D.2009. “A Crisis in the Marketplace: How Food Marketing Contributes to Childhood Obesity and What Can Be Done.” Annual Review of Public Health30:211–25.
35.
HawkesCorinna. 2006. “Uneven Dietary Development: Linking the Policies and Processes of Globalization with the Nutrition Transition, Obesity and Diet-related Chronic Diseases.” Globalization and Health2(4):1–18.
HeugensPursey P. M. A. R.2002. “Strategic Issues Management: Implications for Corporate Performance.” Business & Society41(4):456–68.
41.
HudsonKimberly D.2012. “Bordering Community: Reclaiming Ambiguity as a Transgressive Landscape of Knowledge.” Affilia27:167–79.
42.
JulierAlice. 2008. “The Political Economy of Obesity: The Fat Pay All.” Pp. 482–99 in Food and Culture: A Reader, edited by CounihanCaroleVan EsterikPenny. New York: Routledge.
43.
KarlinerJoshua. 1997. The Corporate Planet: Ecology and Politics in the Age of Globalization. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
44.
KenIvy. 2012. Food Service Contracting in DC Public School System. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
45.
KraakVivica I.StoryMaryWartellaEllen A.GinterJaya. 2011. “Industry Progress to Market a Healthful Diet to American Children and Adolescents.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine41(3):322–33.
46.
LangTimBarlingDavidCaraherMartin. 2009. Food Policy: Integrating Health, Environment and Society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47.
LukerKristin. 2010. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
ManheimJarol B.2011. Strategy in Information and Influence Campaigns: How Policy Advocates, Social Movements, Insurgent Groups, Corporations, Governments and Others Get What They Want. New York: Routledge.
49.
MarkowitzLinda. 2007. “Structural Innovators and Coreframing Tasks: How Socially Responsible Mutual Fund Companies Build Identity among Investors.” Sociological Perspectives50(1):131–53.
50.
MeriläinenNiinaVosMarita. 2013. “Framing Issues in the Public Debate: The Case of Human Rights.” Corporate Communications18(1):119–34.
51.
MesserChris M.AdamsAlison E.ShriverThomas E.2012. “Corporate Frame Failure and the Erosion of Elite Legitimacy.” The Sociological Quarterly53(3):475–99.
52.
MichelettiMicheleStolleDietlind. 2007. “Mobilizing Consumers to Take Responsibility for Global Social Justice.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science611:157–75.
53.
MolnarAlex. 2000. “Colonizing Our Future: The Commercial Transformation of America’s Schools.” Social Education64(7):428–38.
National Research Council. 2012. Alliances for Obesity Prevention: Finding Common Ground: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
56.
NestleMarion. 2002. Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
RichterJudith. 2004. “Public-private Partnerships for Health: A Trend with No Alternatives?” Development47(2):43–48.
66.
RobertsJ. TimmonsParksBradley. 2006. A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved January 12, 2014 (http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/climate-injustice).
67.
SaguyAbigail C.AlmelingRene. 2008. “Fat in the Fire? Science, the News Media, and the ‘Obesity Epidemic.’” Sociological Forum23(1):53–83.
68.
SaiiaDavid H.1999. “Strategic Philanthropy: Corporate Resources for the Public Good.” PhD Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
69.
SaiiaDavid H.CyphertDale. 2003. “The Public Discourse of the Corporate Citizen.” Corporate Reputation Review6(1):47–57.
SliningMeghan M.Wen NgShuPopkinBarry M.2013. “Food Companies’ Calorie-reduction Pledges to Improve U.S. Diet.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine44(2):174–84.
72.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research1:197–217.
73.
SouleSarah A.2012. “Social Movements and Markets, Industries, and Firms.” Organization Studies33(12):1715–33.
74.
StraussAnselmCorbinJuliet M.1997. Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
