Sociology may be heading for a marginal place in a market-dominated world. If it is to do more, it must address major questions about the social world now coming into existence. One of these is the relationship of gender dynamics to neoliberalism. Neoliberalism has to be understood on a world scale, not just as an export of globalNorth preoccupations. Older models of the relationship between capitalism and gender, built on systems models of both, need to be replaced in the light of the coloniality of gender. Researchers across the global South are opening up new perspectives on gender and power; new dynamics of change are visible in transnational arenas created by empire and neoliberal globalization.
AlatasSyed Farid. 2006. Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi, India: Sage.
2.
Bakare-YusufBibi. 2003. “‘Yorubas Don’t Do Gender’: A Critical Review of Oyeronke Oyewumi’s the Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses.” African Identities1(1):121–43.
EpsteinDebbieMorrellRobert. 2012. “Approaching Southern Theory: Explorations of Gender in South African education.” Gender and Education24(5):469–82.
10.
FennellShailajaArnotMadeleine. 2008. “Decentring Hegemonic Gender Theory: The Implications for Educational Research.” Compare38(5):525–38.
11.
FoucaultMichel. 2004. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978-1979. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
GoJulian. 2013. “For a Postcolonial Sociology.” Theory and Society42(1):25–55.
13.
GottfriedHeidi. 2013. Gender, Work, and Economy: Unpacking the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
HarcourtWendy. 2009. Body Politics in Development: Critical Debates in Gender and Development. London, England: Zed Books.
15.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
HerediaMarianaKirtchikOlessia, ed. 2010. Former USSR and Latin America: Studies in post-authoritarian transformations. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research.
17.
KeimWiebke. 2008. Vermessene Disziplin: Zum konterhegemonialen Potential afrikanischer und lateinamerikanischer Soziologien. [Daring Discipline: On the counter-hegemonic potential of African and Latin-American sociologies.] Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag.
18.
KenwayJaneFaheyJohannah, ed. 2009. Globalizing the Research Imagination. London, England: Routledge.
19.
KleinNaomi. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London, England: Penguin.
20.
KollontaiAlexandra. 1977. Selected Writings of Alexandra Kollontai. London, England: Allison & Busby.
21.
LazregMarnia. 1990. “Gender and Politics in Algeria: Unraveling the Religious Paradigm.” Signs15(4):755–80.
22.
LugonesMaria. 2009. “Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system.” Hypatia22: 186-219.
23.
MamaAmina. 1997. “Sheroes and Villains: Conceptualizing Colonial and Contemporary Violence Against Women in Africa.” Pp. 46–62 in Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures, edited by AlexanderM. JacquiMohantyChandra Talpade. New York: Routledge.
24.
NnaemekaObioma. 2005. “Mapping African Feminisms.” Pp. 31–41 in Readings in Gender in Africa, edited by CornwallAndrea. London: England International African Institute, James Currey and Indiana University Press.
25.
OlavarríaJosé, ed. 2009. Masculinidades y globalización: Trabajo y vida privada, familias y sexualidades. [Masculinities and globalization: Work and private life, families and sexualities.] Santiago, Chile: Red de Masculinidiad/es Chile, Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano and CEDEM.
26.
ParpartJaneZalewskiMarisia, ed. 2008. Rethinking the Man Question: Sex, Gender and Violence in International Relations. London, England: Zed Books.
27.
PatelSujata, ed. 2010. The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
28.
QuijanoAníbal. 2000. “Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America.” International Sociology15(2):215–32.
29.
RadcliffeSarah A.LaurieNinaAndolinaRobert. 2004. “The Transnationalization of Gender and Reimagining Andean Indigenous Development.” Signs29:387–416.
30.
SaffiotiHeleieth I. B.[1969] 1978. A mulher na sociedade de classes [Women in Class Society]. New York: Monthly Review Press.
31.
ViverosMara. 2007. “De diferencia y diferencias. Algunos debates desde las teorías feministas y de género.” [On difference and differences: some debates from feminist and gender theories.] Pp. 175-190 in Género, mujeres y saberes en América Latina, edited by ArangoLuz GabrielaPuyanaYolanda. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
