In this article, I explore how the fragmented and specialized character of sociology has resulted in the search for overly simplistic causal processes or “congruence.” The core argument focuses less on the structure of the discipline, per se, and more on some of the problems that have arisen as a consequence of it. To these ends, I identify three problems endemic to an increasing portion of sociological work: (1) a disjuncture between theory and evidence, (2) critical versus creative interpretations, and (3) methodological overspecialization. I go further and conclude by suggesting viable intellectual and analytic pathways that allow for and encourage recognition of complexity in the social world.
AbbottAndrew. 1997. “Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School.” Social Forces75:1149–82.
2.
BlauPeter M.SchwartzJoseph E.1984. Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
3.
BourdieuPierre. 1988. “Vive la crise! For Heterodoxy in Social Science.” Theory and Society17:773–87.
4.
ChavesMark. 2010. “Rain Dances in the Dry Season: Overcoming the Religious Congruence Fallacy.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion49:1–14.
5.
D’AndradeRoy. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
FestingerLeon. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
GansHerbert J.2009. “Working in Six Research Areas: A Multi-Field Sociological Career.” Annual Review of Sociology35: 1–19.
8.
GawronskiBertramStrackFritz, eds. 2012. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
GouldnerAlvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.
10.
MaioGregory R.OlsonJames M.BernardMark M.LukeMichelle A.2003. “Ideologies, Values, Attitudes, and Behavior.” Pp. 283–308 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by DelamaterJohn. New York: Kluwer Academic.
11.
ReadJen’nan GhazalEagleDavid. 2011. “Intersecting Identities as a Source of Religious Incongruence.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50:116–32.
12.
ReadJen’nan GhazalReynoldsMegan. 2012. “Gender Differences in Immigrant Health: The Case of Mexican and Middle Eastern Immigrants.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior53:99–123.
13.
SteinmetzGeorgeChaeOu-Byung. 2002. “Sociology in an Era of Fragmentation: From the Sociology of Knowledge to the Philosophy of Science, and Back Again.” The Sociological Quarterly43:111–37.
14.
SwidlerAnn. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review51:273–86.
