This review analyzes 59 studies from 2014 to 2024 examining design thinking integration in professional communication pedagogy across eight disciplinary journals. Design thinking has evolved from experimental use to systematic pedagogical approaches, with assignment-level integration proving most viable for educators. Empathy interviews and user research bridge design thinking principles with communication pedagogy’s audience awareness focus. Students show enhanced empathy, improved collaboration, and increased creative confidence with high motivation levels. Implementation challenges include time constraints, student resistance to ambiguity, and assessment difficulties. The study recommends scaffolded introduction, integration with existing content, and institutional support for desirable implementation in business and professional communication pedagogy.
AndrewsD. C. (2017). A space for place in business communication research. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(3), 325–336.
2.
AndrewsD. C. (2025). Designing business communications in a disrupted workplace. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 769–784.
3.
AndrewsD. C.ThamJ. (2021). Designing technical and professional communication: Strategies for the global community. Routledge.
4.
ArmstrongC. E. (2016). Teaching innovation through empathy: Design thinking in the undergraduate business classroom. Management Teaching Review, 1(3), 164–169.
5.
BeligatamullaG.RiegerJ.FranzJ.StrickfadenM. (2019). Making pedagogic sense of design thinking in the higher education context. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 91–105.
6.
BensonJ.DresdowS. (2014). Design thinking: A fresh approach for transformative assessment practice. Journal of Management Education, 38(3), 436–461.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
8.
Çeviker-ÇınarG.MuraG.Demirbağ-KaplanM. (2017). Design thinking: A new road map in business education. The Design Journal, 20(1), S977–S987.
9.
ChoiH.KimH.KimN. (2024). Enhancing creativity through a problem-based design thinking project in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2378272.
10.
DeVastoD.PalmerZ. (2024). Building critical AI literacy in the business communication classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(4), 557–572.
11.
D’SouzaD. E.BementD.CoryK. (2022). Cross-functional integration skills: Are business schools delivering what organizations need?Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 20(3), 117–130.
12.
DuinA. H.MosesJ.McGrathM.ThamJ.ErnstN. (2017). Design thinking methodology: A case study of “radical collaboration” in the wearables research collaboratory. Connexion: International Professional Communication Journal, 5(1), 45–74.
13.
DuinA. H.ThamJ.MosesJ. (2019). Connecting silos through design thinking: Radical collaboration in the Wearables Research Collaboratory. In MinacoriP. (Ed.), Technical communication: Beyond the silos (pp. 51–65). Hermann Publications.
14.
DuráL.PerezL.ChaparroM. (2019). Positive deviance as design thinking: Challenging notions of stasis in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 376–399.
15.
FosterM. K. (2021). Design thinking: A creative approach to problem solving. Management Teaching Review, 6(2), 123–140.
16.
GlenR.SuciuC.BaughnC. (2014). The need for design thinking in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 653–667.
17.
GrantA. (2025). Enhancing creative confidence in marketing pedagogy with design thinking. Marketing Education Review, 35(1), 16–30.
18.
GreenwoodA.LaurenB.KnottJ.DeVossD. N. (2019). Dissensus, resistance, and ideology: Design thinking as a rhetorical methodology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 400–424.
19.
Guaman-QuintanillaS.EveraertP.ChiluizaK.ValckeM. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: A multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 217–240.
20.
HenriksenD.GretterS.RichardsonC. (2020). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: Addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education, 31(2), 209–229.
21.
InayatI.SalimS. S. (2015). A framework to study requirements-driven collaboration among agile teams: Findings from two case studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1367–1379.
22.
JamalT.KircherJ.DonaldsonJ. P. (2021). Re-visiting design thinking for learning and practice: Critical pedagogy, conative empathy. Sustainability, 13(2), 964–989.
23.
JamesonD. A. (2009). What’s the right answer? Team problem-solving in environments of uncertainty. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 215–221.
24.
JaskyteK. (2024). The power of design thinking: Exploring creative confidence and creative efficacy in college students. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 14(1), 71–85.
25.
KimH. J.YiP.KoB. W. (2023). Deepening students’ experiences with problem identification and definition in an empathetic approach: Lessons from a university design-thinking program. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 852–865.
26.
KlecknerM. J.ButzN. (2021). Addressing undergraduate skill gaps in higher education: Revisiting communication in the major course outcomes. Journal of Education for Business, 96(7), 411–423.
27.
KohJ. H. L.ChaiC. S.WongB.HongH. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer Singapore.
28.
LakeD.GuoW.ChenE.McLaughlinJ. (2024). Design thinking in higher education: Opportunities and challenges for decolonized learning. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 12, 1–22.
29.
LeeS.TurnerH. N.RoseE. J. (2023). Community-engaged user experience pedagogy: Stories, emergent strategy, and possibilities. Communication Design Quarterly, 11(3), 28–41.
30.
LeinonenT.DurallE. (2014). Design thinking and collaborative learning. Comunicar, 21(42), 107–116.
31.
LentzP. (2013). MBA students’ workplace writing: Implications for business writing pedagogy and workplace practice. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(4), 474–490.
32.
LeverenzC. S. (2014). Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 33, 1–12.
McLaughlinJ. E.LakeD.ChenE.GuoW.KnockM.KnotekS. (2023). Faculty experiences and motivations in design thinking teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1172814.
39.
PankeS. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306.
40.
PellegriniM. (2022). Composing like an entrepreneur: The pedagogical implications of design thinking in the workplace. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 52(3), 316–333.
41.
PhanT. A. (2025). Business communication research: Trends and themes from dual bibliometric analysis. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906251358384.
42.
PonceT. (2023). The Twain shall meet: Shakespeare, design thinking, and technical communication pedagogy. Pedagogy, 23(2), 249–262.
43.
Pope-RuarkR. (2019). Design thinking in technical and professional communication: Four perspectives. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 437–455.
44.
Pope-RuarkR.ThamJ.MosesJ.ConnerT. (Eds.). (2019). Design thinking approaches in technical and professional communication [Special issue]. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 370–465.
45.
RazzoukR.ShuteV. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
46.
RetnaK. S. (2019). Thinking about “design thinking”: A study of teacher experiences. In LiuW. C.GohC. C. M. (Eds.), Teachers’ perceptions, experience and learning (pp. 4–18). Routledge.
47.
RupcicN. (2024). Working and learning in a hybrid workplace: Challenges and opportunities. The Learning Organization, 31(2), 276–283.
SchieberD. L. (2016). Learning transfer from the business communication classroom to the workplace [Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University].
50.
SureshV.KolluruM. (2022). Pedagogy innovation for management graduates: Application of design thinking. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3-4), 659–674.
51.
ThamJ. (2021a). Design thinking in technical communication: Solving problems through making and collaboration. Routledge.
52.
ThamJ. (2021b). Engaging design thinking and making in technical and professional communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 392–409.
53.
ThamJ. (2022). Pasts and futures of design thinking: Implications for technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 65(2), 261–279.
54.
ThamJ.HowardT.VerhulsdonckG. (2022). Extending design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence into technical communication and user experience design programs: Further pedagogical implications. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 52(4), 428–459.
55.
VallisC.RedmondP. (2021). Introducing design thinking online to large business education courses for twenty-first century learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(6), 213–234.
56.
VerhulsdonckG.HowardT.ThamJ. (2021). Investigating the impact of design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence: A “streams” approach for technical communication and UX. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 468–492.
57.
WangC. C. (2024). Using design thinking for interdisciplinary curriculum design and teaching: A case study in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–13.
58.
WelshM. A.DehlerG. E. (2013). Combining critical reflection and design thinking to develop integrative learners. Journal of Management Education, 37(6), 771–802.
59.
WrightC. S.HallA. A. (2019). Communication skills in the workplace: An investigation into student perceptions. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 59(2), 55–63.
60.
WrigleyC.StrakerK. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385.
61.
YilmazG. (2022). Revitalizing the communication classroom: A case of design thinking. Communication Teacher, 36(3), 216-233.
62.
YuH.YuS.LinY. (2024). A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–12.
63.
YuY.YuW.PanS. (2025). Design fiction as a novel approach to cultivate awareness of social responsibilities: An explorative study in a technical writing course for engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 68(1), 99–117.
