Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
The Parasocial Synergy: Decoding the Hypocrisy Reduction Impact of Social Media Influencer Partnerships in Corporate Social Responsibility Communication
This study examines the impact of social media influencers (SMIs) on public attitudes toward corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns. Using Balance Theory and parasocial relationships (PSRs) as key frameworks, it explores how PSRs influence CSR hypocrisy, positive moral emotions, and corporate-related outcomes, while considering the role of SMI-CSR fit. A survey with vignette featuring fictitious partnerships between real corporations and SMIs was conducted. Findings suggest that stronger PSRs reduce CSR hypocrisy perceptions, enhance positive moral emotions, and improve corporate outcomes, but only when SMI-CSR fit is moderate to high. This study advances CSR communication research and informs SMI-related business decision-making.
AbidinC. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
2.
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650519
ArliD.GraceA.PalmerJ.PhamC. (2017). Investigating the direct and indirect effects of corporate hypocrisy and perceived corporate reputation on consumers’ attitudes toward the company. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.04.002
5.
BallantineP. W.MartinB. A. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, Article 197.
6.
BiN. C.ZhangR. (2022). “I will buy what my ‘friend’ recommends”: The effects of parasocial relationships, influencer credibility and self-esteem on purchase intentions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-08-2021-0214
7.
BrevesP.LiebersN. (2022). # Greenfluencing. The impact of parasocial relationships with social media influencers on advertising effectiveness and followers’ pro-environmental intentions. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2109708
8.
BrevesP.LiebersN.MotschenbacherB.ReusL. (2021). Reducing resistance: The impact of nonfollowers’ and followers’ parasocial relationships with social media influencers on persuasive resistance and advertising effectiveness. Human Communication Research, 47(4), 418–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab006
9.
BoermanS. C.MeijersM. H.ZwartW. (2022). The importance of influencer-message congruence when employing greenfluencers to promote pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication, 16(7), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2115525
10.
BrewsterM. L.LyuJ. (2020, December). Exploring the parasocial impact of nano, micro and macro influencers. International textile and apparel association annual conference proceedings (Vol. 77, No. 1). Iowa State University Digital Press. https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.12254
11.
BrownT. J.DacinP. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100106
12.
BuvárÁ.ZsilaÁ.OroszG. (2023). Non-green influencers promoting sustainable consumption: Dynamic norms enhance the credibility of authentic pro-environmental posts. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1112762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112762
13.
CampbellC.FarrellJ. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
14.
ChenY. R. R.Hung-BaeseckeC. J. F.ChengY. (2023). When non-CSR-themed social media influencers endorse corporate CSR initiatives: Effects of publics’ perceived influencer characteristics and leadership. Public Relations Review, 49(1), Article 102288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102288
15.
ChengY.ChenY. R. R.Hung-BaeseckeC. J. F. (2021). Social media influencers in CSR endorsement: The effect of consumer mimicry on CSR behaviors and consumer relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4), 744–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320987184
16.
ChengY.Hung-BaeseckeC. J. F.ChenY. R. R. (2021). Social media influencer effects on CSR communication: The role of influencer leadership in opinion and taste. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(2), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211035112
17.
ChildersC. C.BoatwrightB. (2021). Do digital natives recognize digital influence? Generational differences and understanding of social media influencers. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 42(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2020.1830893
18.
ChildersC. C.LemonL. L.HoyM. G. (2019). #Sponsored #Ad: Agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1521113
19.
ChonM. G.KimY. (2021). Megaphoning effects of skepticism, cynicism, and situational motivation on an environmental CSR activity. Public Relations Review, 47(4), Article 102082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102082
20.
ChristensenL. T.MorsingM.ThyssenO. (2020). Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research, 114, 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020
21.
De JongM. D.van der MeerM. (2017). How does it fit? Exploring the congruence between organizations and their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2782-2
22.
DekoninckH.SchmuckD. (2022). The mobilizing power of influencers for pro-environmental behavior intentions and political participation. Environmental Communication, 16(4), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2027801
23.
DekoninckH.SchmuckD. (2024). The “greenfluence”: Following environmental influencers, parasocial relationships, and youth’s participation behavior. New Media & Society, 26(11), 6615–6635. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231156131
24.
DekoninckH.Van HoutvenE.SchmuckD. (2023). Inspiring G(re)en Z: Unraveling (para) social bonds with influencers and perceptions of their environmental content. Environmental Communication, 17(7), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2237693
25.
De VeirmanM.CaubergheV.HuddersL. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
26.
DjafarovaE.RushworthC. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
27.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
EffronD. A.O’ConnorK.LeroyH.LucasB. J. (2018). From inconsistency to hypocrisy: When does “saying one thing but doing another” invite condemnation?Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.003
30.
EllemersN.ChopovaT. (2021). The social responsibility of organizations: Perceptions of organizational morality as a key mechanism explaining the relation between CSR activities and stakeholder support. Research in Organizational Behavior, 41, Article 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2022.100156
31.
EscalasJ. E.BettmanJ. R. (2017). Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1274925
32.
FarivarS.WangF.YuanY. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, Article 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371
33.
FassinY.BuelensM. (2011). The hypocrisy-sincerity continuum in corporate communication and decision making: A model of corporate social responsibility and business ethics practices. Management Decision, 49(4), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111126503
34.
FernandezP.HartmannP.ApaolazaV. (2022). What drives CSR communication effectiveness on social media? A process-based theoretical framework and research agenda. International Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1947016
35.
FröhlichR.KnoblochA. S. (2021). “Are they allowed to do that?” Content and typology of corporate socio-political positioning on Twitter. A study of DAX-30 companies in Germany. Public Relations Review, 47(5), Article 102113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102113
36.
GreenbaumR.BonnerJ.GrayT.MawritzM. (2020). Moral emotions: A review and research agenda for management scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2367
37.
GuèvremontA.GrohmannB. (2018). Does brand authenticity alleviate the effect of brand scandals?Journal of Brand Management, 25, 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0084-y
38.
HaidtJ. (2003). The moral emotions. In DavisonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
41.
HessA. C.DoddsS.RahmanN. (2022). The development of reputational capital–How social media influencers differ from traditional celebrities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(5), 1236–1252. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2074
42.
HolidayS.HayesJ. L.ParkH.LyuY.ZhouY. (2023). A multimodal emotion perspective on social media influencer marketing: The effectiveness of influencer emotions, network size, and branding on consumer brand engagement using facial expression and linguistic analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(4), 414–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968231171104
43.
HortonD.WohlR. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
44.
KaminsM. A. (1990). An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673175
KimJ. E.JohnsonK. K. (2013). The impact of moral emotions on cause-related marketing campaigns: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1233-6
47.
KimJ. E.SongH. (2016). Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
48.
KimM.YinX.LeeG. (2020). The effect of CSR on corporate image, customer citizenship behaviors, and customers’ long-term relationship orientation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, Article 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102520
49.
KlimmtC.HartmannT.SchrammH. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.). Psychology of entertainment (pp. 293–316). Routledge.
50.
KotlerP.LeeN. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Wiley.
51.
KnupferH.NeureiterA.MatthesJ. (2023). From social media diet to public riot? Engagement with “greenfluencers” and young social media users’ environmental activism. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, Article 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107527
52.
LadeiraW.Jr.SantiagoJ. K.de Oliveira SantiniF.Costa PintoD. (2022). Impact of brand familiarity on attitude formation: Insights and generalizations from a meta-analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(8), 1168–1179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2020-3166
53.
LeeE. M.ParkS. Y.RapertM. I.NewmanC. L. (2012). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues?Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.040
54.
LeeH.HarrisonV. S.LeeM. (2025). What makes an influencer? Comparing US and Chinese Millennial perceptions of brand communication from the most-followed influencers on TikTok and Douyin. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 19(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2024.2378374
55.
LeeM. T.TheokaryC. (2021). The superstar social media influencer: Exploiting linguistic style and emotional contagion over content?Journal of Business Research, 132, 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.014
56.
LeeS. S.KimY.RohT. (2019). Modified pyramid of CSR for corporate image and customer loyalty: Focusing on the moderating role of the CSR experience. Sustainability, 11(17), Article 4745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174745
57.
LiM. (2022). Influence for social good: Exploring the roles of influencer identity and comment section in Instagram-based LGBTQ-centric corporate social responsibility advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 462–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1884399
58.
LiJ. Y.LeeY.TaoW.XuD.DongE. (2024). Organizations with true heart: The role of organizational identity in shaping consumer attributions of corporate responsibility to race (CRR) motives. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(4), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2023.2298864
59.
LiuM. T.LiuY.ZhangL. L. (2019). Vlog and brand evaluations: The influence of parasocial interaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(2), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0021
60.
LouC. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345.
61.
LouC.YuanS. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
62.
LyonT. P.MontgomeryA. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: The impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1958-x
63.
MacKenzieS. B.LutzR. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298905300204
64.
MarínL.CuestasP. J.RománS. (2016). Determinants of consumer attributions of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2578-4
65.
NaneviA.SongT.VelezL. E. (2022). Influencer marketing: United States versus China. Journal for Global Business and Community, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56020/001c.36176
66.
OkazakiS.PlanggerK.WestD.MenéndezH. D. (2020). Exploring digital corporate social responsibility communications on Twitter. Journal of Business Research, 117, 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.006.
67.
PanopoulosA.PoulisA.TheodoridisP.KalampakasA. (2022). Influencing green purchase intention through eco labels and user-generated content. Sustainability, 15(1), Article 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010764.
68.
ParkH. J.LinL. M. (2020). The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, Article 101934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101934
69.
PérezA.Rodríguez del BosqueI. (2013). Customer personal features as determinants of the formation process of corporate social responsibility perceptions. Psychology & Marketing, 30(10), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20654
70.
PittmanM.AbellA. (2021). More trust in fewer followers: Diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.002
71.
ReinikainenH.MunnukkaJ.MaityD.Luoma-AhoV. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781
72.
RomaniS.GrappiS.BagozziR. P. (2013). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of gratitude and altruistic values. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z
73.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M.PowellR. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
74.
ShengJ.LeeY. H.LanH. (2024). Parasocial relationships with micro-influencers: Do sponsorship disclosure and electronic word-of-mouth disrupt?Internet Research, 34(3), 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2021-0903
75.
SkillingK.StylianidesG. J. (2020). Using vignettes in educational research: a framework for vignette construction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1704243
TukachinskyR.WalterN.SaucierC. J. (2020). Antecedents and effects of parasocial relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa034
78.
UtkutugC. P. (2024). The mediating effect of consumers’ perceived ethicality in the relationship between consumer cynicism/material values and affective commitment. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(3), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-022-00199-y
79.
VrontisD.MakridesA.ChristofiM.ThrassouA. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647
80.
WagnerT.KorschunD.TroebsC. C. (2020). Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets. Journal of Business Research, 114, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.041
81.
WagnerT.LutzR. J.WeitzB. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
82.
WatkinsH. M.BastianB. (2019). Lest we forget: The effect of war commemorations on regret, positive moral emotions, and support for war. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619829067
83.
WeiL. R. (2017). The status analysis and prospective development studies of digital celebrity industry in “Internet+” era. China Journal of Commerce, 6(6), 20–21
84.
XieC.BagozziR. P. (2019). Consumer responses to corporate social irresponsibility: The role of moral emotions, evaluations, and social cognitions. Psychology & Marketing, 36(6), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21197
85.
XieC.BagozziR. P.GrønhaugK. (2015). The role of moral emotions and individual differences in consumer responses to corporate green and non-green actions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0394-5
86.
XieC.BagozziR. P.GrønhaugK. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences. Journal of Business Research, 95, 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.043
87.
YangC.ZhouZ.GaoL.LianS.ZhaiS.ZhangD. (2023). The impact of interpersonal alienation on excessive Internet fiction reading: Analysis of parasocial relationship as a mediator and relational-interdependent self-construal as a moderator. Current Psychology, 42(23), 19824–19839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02601-x
88.
YangJ.ChuenterawongP.LeeH.TianY.ChockT. M. (2023). Human versus virtual influencer: The effect of humanness and interactivity on persuasive CSR messaging. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2189036
89.
YangJ.ChuenterawongP.PugdeethosapolK. (2021). Speaking up on black lives matter: A comparative study of consumer reactions toward brand and influencer-generated corporate social responsibility messages. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1984345
90.
YuanS.LouC. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514
91.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
92.
ZhaoX.ZhuZ.ShanM.CaoR.ChenH. A. (2024). “Informers” or “entertainers”: The effect of social media influencers on consumers’ green consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, Article 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103647
