The rise of remote and hybrid work, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has brought new challenges for organizations’ internal communication. The increasing complexity of the modern work environment calls for effective leadership communication to keep employees engaged. The goal of this study is to examine how supervisory leadership communication, specifically supervisors’ use of motivating language, influences employee trust, engagement, and supportive behaviors toward the organization, with a focus on differences between remote and onsite settings. We conducted an online survey of 2,004 full-time U.S. employees across 18 industries, and data were analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM) and multi-group comparison. Results showed that supervisors’ use of motivating language significantly predicted employee trust, engagement, and supportive behaviors. Multi-group SEM revealed that work mode moderated several relationships: motivating language had a stronger effect on trust for onsite employees than remote employees, and trust had a stronger effect on supportive behaviors for onsite employees. In contrast, employee engagement showed a stronger impact on supportive behaviors for remote employees. These findings offer important insights for optimizing leadership communication across modern work environments and extending Motivating Language Theory to flexible work contexts.
AdisaT. A.OgbonnayaC.AdekoyaO. D. (2023). Remote working and employee engagement: A qualitative study of British workers during the pandemic. Information Technology & People, 36(5), 1835–1850.
2.
AlikajA.HankeD. (2025). An examination of the link between leader motivating language and follower interactional justice. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(2), 281–306.
3.
AllenK. A.SvendsenG. T.MarwanS.ArslanG. (2021). Trust and belonging in individual and organizational relationships. In CamilleriM. A. (Ed.), Strategic corporate communication in the digital age (pp. 19–31). Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds.
4.
AllenT. D.GoldenT. D.ShockleyK. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
5.
AlshwayatD.MacVaughJ. A.AkbarH. (2021). A multi-level perspective on trust, collaboration and knowledge sharing cultures in a highly formalized organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2220–2244.
6.
AselageJ.EisenbergerR. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.211
7.
AustinJ. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
BaqueroA. (2023). Authentic leadership, employee work engagement, trust in the leader, and workplace well-being: A moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1403–1424.
10.
BeckerJ. A. H.Dan O’HairH. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701434232
11.
BinyaminG.Brender-IlanY. (2018). Leaders’s language and employee proactivity: Enhancing psychological meaningfulness and vitality. European Management Journal, 36(4), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.004
12.
CadwalladerS.JarvisC. B.BitnerM. J.OstromA. L. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 219–239.
13.
CartonA. M.MurphyC.ClarkJ. R. (2014). A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1544–1570. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0101
14.
ChenJ. K. C.SriphonT. (2022). Authentic leadership, trust, and social exchange relationships under the influence of leader behavior. Sustainability, 14(10), 5883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105883
15.
ClackL. (2021). Employee engagement: Keys to organizational success. In DhimanS. K. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of workplace well-being (pp. 1001–1028). Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
DaiY.TangY. M.ChenW.HouJ. (2022). How organizational trust impacts organizational citizenship behavior: Organizational identification and employee loyalty as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 996962.
17.
DinhJ. V.ReyesD. L.KaygaL.LindgrenC.FeitosaJ.SalasE. (2021). Developing team trust: Leader insights for virtual settings. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100846.
18.
DirksK. T.de JongB. (2022). Trust within the workplace: A review of two waves of research and a glimpse of the third. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-083025
19.
Elsner TwesmeE.WernerJ. M.SimhaA. (2025). Can we talk? Improving employee contextual performance using motivating language and feedback orientation. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(2), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211038745
20.
FullerL. P. (2023). Empathetic leadership: Motivating organizational citizenship behavior and strengthen leader-member exchange relationships. International Business Research, 16(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n3p38
21.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439327
22.
GajendranR. S.HarrisonD. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
23.
GuinotJ.ChivaR.Roca-PuigV. (2014). Interpersonal trust, stress and satisfaction at work: An empirical study. Personnel Review, 43(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2012-0043
24.
Gutierrez-WirschingS.MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.WangW. (2015). Motivating language as a mediator between servant leadership and employee outcomes. Management Research Review, 38(12), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-01-2014-0009
25.
HanayshaJ. (2016). Testing the effects of employee engagement, work environment, and organizational learning on organizational commitment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.139
26.
HonL. C.GrunigJ. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Institute for Public Relations.
27.
JagdS.FuglsangL. (2016). Studying trust as process within and between organizations. In S. Jagd & L. Fuglsang (Eds.), Trust, organizations and social interaction (pp. 1–18). Edward Elgar Publishing.
28.
JämsenR.SivunenA.BlomqvistK. (2022). Employees’ perceptions of relational communication in full-time remote work in the public sector. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107240
29.
JanssonL. J.KangasH. (2025). The art of staying in touch – Exploring daily feedback interactions between a leader and a subordinate in remote work. Personnel Review, 54, 660–679. https://www.emerald.com/insight/0048-3486.htm
30.
JenaL. K.BhattacharyyaP.PradhanS. (2017). Employee engagement and affective organizational commitment: Mediating role of employee voice among Indian Service Sector Employees. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 21(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262917733170
31.
JiangH.LuoY. (2018). Crafting employee trust: From authenticity, transparency to engagement. Journal of Communication Management, 22(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-07-2016-0055
32.
JiangL.ProbstT. M. (2015). The relationship between safety–production conflict and employee safety outcomes: Testing the impact of multiple organizational climates. Work & Stress, 29(2), 171–189.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
35.
KusnayaA. A.LukmanS.SyafrizalS. (2022). Analysis of leadership influence, resource allocation, and employee engagement on the effectiveness of strategy implementation. Jbti Jurnal Bisnis Teori Dan Implementasi, 13(3), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.18196/jbti.v13i3.15529
36.
LeeE.MitsonR.XuH. (2024). The influence of leaders’ motivational language on employee well-being through relatedness in remote work environments. Journal of Communication Management. Advance Online Publications. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0038
37.
LeeY.KimJ. (2021). Cultivating employee creativity through strategic internal communication: The role of leadership, symmetry, and feedback seeking behaviors. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101998
MadlockP. (1970). The influence of supervisors’ leadership style on telecommuters. Journal of Business Strategies, 29(1), 1–24.
40.
MadlockP. E.SextonS. (2015). An application of motivating language theory in Mexican organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 255–272.
41.
MashhadiA.MathurA.Van Den BroeckM.VanderhulstG.KawsarF. (2016). Understanding the impact of personal feedback on face-to-face interactions in the workplace [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2993148.2993187
42.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
43.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2009). The role of leader motivating language in employee absenteeism. Journal of Business Communication, 46(4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943609338665
44.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2017). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace. Springer.
45.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2018). Speaking from the heart: Empathetic language. In MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (Eds). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace (pp. 35-48). Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.HankeD. (2023). Let’s say thanks: How motivating language increases engagement and empowerment through follower gratitude. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance Online Publications https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231216078
47.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.KopfJ. (1995). Motivating language: Exploring theory with scale development. The Journal of Business Communication, 32(4), 329–344.
48.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. R.KopfJ. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 37(3-4), 235–248.
49.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.SharbroughW. C. (2015). Strategic vision and values in top leaders’ communications: Motivating language at a higher level. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414560282
50.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2021). Sound and safe: The role of leader motivating language and follower self-leadership in feelings of psychological safety. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 51.
51.
MazzeiA.RavazzaniS. (2015). Internal crisis communication strategies to protect trust relationships: A study of Italian companies. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525447
52.
MelhemY. S.Al QudahM. F. (2019). Work engagement: Trust and respect to engage your people. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(17), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i17/144033
53.
MenL. R. (2014). Why leadership matters to internal communication: Linking transformational leadership, symmetrical communication, and employee outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2014.908719
54.
MenL. R.QinY. S.JinJ. (2022). Fostering employee trust via effective supervisory communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: Through the lens of motivating language theory. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211020491
55.
MenL. R.YueC. A. (2019). Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on employee supportive behaviors. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.03.001
56.
MenL. R.YueC. A.LiuY. (2020). “Vision, passion, and care”: The impact of charismatic executive leadership communication on employee trust and support for organizational change. Public Relations Review, 46(3), 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101927
57.
Morrison-SmithS.RuizJ. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
58.
MorrowJ. L.JrHansenM. H.PearsonA. W. (2004). The cognitive and affective antecedents of general trust within cooperative organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16(1), 48–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40601183
59.
NeillM. S.KangM. (2024). Guest editorial: Shifting role and challenges of internal communication in an age of workplace turbulence/disruption. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 29(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-05-2024-182
60.
NguyenC. N.NingW.AlikajA.TranQ. N. (2021). Motivating language and employee outcomes: A multinational investigation. Management Research Review, 44(2), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-02-2020-0071
61.
OrganD. W.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications.
62.
OsborneS.HammoudM. S. (2017). Effective employee engagement in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2017.16.1.04
63.
ÖzlükB.BaykalÜ. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior among nurses: The influence of organizational trust and job satisfaction. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 28(3), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2020.19108
64.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.
65.
PodsakoffN. P.WhitingS. W.PodsakoffP. M.BlumeB. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
66.
PutraE. D.ChoS.LiuJ. (2017). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on work engagement in the hospitality industry: Test of motivation crowding theory. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(2), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415613393
67.
QinY. S. (2025). Inspiring employee engagement in remote work: The influence of leadership communication and trust in leadership. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 19(3), 458–475 https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2024.2417669
68.
QinY. S.DiStasoM. W.FitzsimmonsA. B.HeffronE. (2023). Communicating the big picture with employees: The impacts of CEO vision communication on employee engagement. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance Online Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231190387
69.
QinY. S.MenL. R. (2021). Why does listening matter inside the organization? The impact of internal listening on employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 33(5), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2022.2034631
70.
RabiulM. K.YeanT. F. (2021). Leadership styles, motivating language, and work engagement: An empirical investigation of the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102712
71.
RahayuningsihI. (2019). The positive impact of organizational trust: A systematic review. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 8(1), 436755.
SchaufeliW. (2021). Engaging leadership: how to promote work engagement?Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556.
74.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
75.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
76.
SearleR. H.BallK. S. (2004). The development of trust and distrust in a merger. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(7), 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410559392
77.
SinghV. (2019). The impact of job engagement and organizational commitment on organizational performance: Evidence from India. In SharmaN.ChaudharyN.SinghV. K. (Eds.), Management techniques for employee engagement in contemporary organizations (pp. 218–235). IGI Global.
78.
SinghU.SrivastavaK. B. (2016). Organizational trust and organizational citizenship behaviour. Global Business Review, 17(3), 594–609.
79.
SongH.LiY.ZhangQ.ChengY. (2023). The moderating effects of trust and felt trust on the nonlinear relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 2517–2531.
80.
SpitzmullerM.Van DyneL.IliesR. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior: A review and extension of its nomological network. In BarlingJ.CooperC. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior (pp.106–123). Sage.
81.
SullD.SullC.BersinJ. (2020). Five ways leaders can support remote work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(4), 1–10.
82.
SullivanJ. J. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 104–115.
83.
SuW.HahnJ. (2025). Self-leadership and psychological capital as mediators in the influence of leader motivating language on everyday innovative behavior. International Journal of Business Communication, 62, 379–401.
84.
TalukderM. F.AtincG. (2024). Empowering commitment: unraveling the impact of motivating language and the mediating role of trust. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. Advance Online Publications. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-12-2023-0196
85.
TaoW.LeeY.SunR.LiJ. Y.HeM. (2022). Enhancing employee engagement via leaders’ motivational language in times of crisis: Perspectives from the COVID-19 outbreak. Public Relations Review, 48(1), 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102133
86.
TerceroR. F. (2019). The relationship between manager’s use of direction-giving, empathetic, and meaning-making language and the quality of employee decision-making. Pepperdine University.
87.
ThelenP. D.YueC. A.VergheseA. K. (2022). Increasing employee advocacy through supervisor motivating language: The mediating role of psychological conditions. Public Relations Review, 48(5), 102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102253
88.
TworekK.LuoG.PaškaM.SałamachaA. (2023). The influence of E-trust on a job performance model based on employees’ dynamic capabilities during a crisis caused by a Black Swan Event. Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation, 19(2), 159-187.. https://doi.org/10.7341/20231925
89.
UluturkB.Yilmaz AltuntasE.HürmeriçP. (2025). Authentic leadership, motivating language, psychological empowerment, and work engagement: A serial mediation model. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(2), 402–431.
90.
UruF. O.GozukaraE.TezcanL. (2022). The moderating roles of remote, hybrid, and onsite working on the relationship between work engagement and organizational identification during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(24), 16828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416828
91.
Van ZoonenW.SivunenA. E. (2022). The impact of remote work and mediated communication frequency on isolation and psychological distress. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(4), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2021.2002299
92.
VerčičA. T.VerčičD.ČožS.ŠpoljarićA. (2024). A systematic review of digital internal communication. Public Relations Review, 50(1), 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102400
93.
ViererblB.DennerN.KochT. (2022). “You don’t meet anybody when walking from the living room to the kitchen”: Informal communication during remote work. Journal of Communication Management, 26(3), 331–348. https://www.emerald.com/insight/1363-254X.htm
94.
WaldenJ. A.Kingsley WestermanC. Y. (2018). Strengthening the tie: Creating exchange relationships that encourage employee advocacy as an organizational citizenship behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(4), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918783612
95.
WangG.LiJ. Y.TaoW.LeeY. (2024). Navigating the decision to disclose mental illness in the workplace: The role of Leader motivating language and perceived organizational support. Health Communication, 39, 2390–2401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2269335
96.
WoodG.McDermottP.SwanW. (2002). The ethical benefits of trust-based partnering: The example of the construction industry. Business Ethics A European Review, 11(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00254
97.
YangL.HoltzD.JaffeS.SuriS.SinhaS.WestonJ.JoyceC.ShahN.ShermanK.HechtB.TeevanJ. (2022). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4
98.
YueC. A. (2025). Creating organizational authenticity and identification: Effect of leaders’ motivating language and impact on employee advocacy. International Journal of Business Communication, 62, 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211035116
99.
ZhaoH.AliM. H. (2025). The power of words: How does leader’s motivating language affect employees’ organizational commitment. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(2), 347–378.
