This paper describes a study of a training film about business presentations, Making Your Case. We offer this historical study in the context of a broader claim, arguing that (as part of a “visual turn”) business communication scholars should give more attention to film. We propose that scholars should develop conceptual perspectives and tools appropriate to the study of film as business communication, including an array of genres based on sponsorship and purpose. We develop one specific example, the genre of the readymade training film (RTF) and apply it to Making Your Case.
AllenW. H. (1971). Instructional media research: Past, present, and future. AV Communication Review, 19(1), 5–18.
3.
AndrewsD. C. (2024). Commentary: A space for place in business communication research updated. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(3), 722–737.
BatesT. (1981). Towards a better research framework for evaluating the effectiveness of educational media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 215–233.
12.
BelcherD. D. (2023). Digital genres: What they are, what they do, and why we need to better understand them. English for Specific Purposes, 70(1), 33–43.
13.
BellE.WarrenS.SchroederJ. (Eds.) (2014). The Routledge companion to visual organization. Routledge.
14.
BlakesleyD. (2009). Defining film rhetoric: The case of Hitchcock’s Vertigo. In HillC. A.HelmersM. (Eds.). Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 111–133). Routledge. (Original work published 2004)
15.
BordwellD.StaigerJ.ThompsonK. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style and mode of production to 1960. Columbia University Press.
16.
BoxenbaumE.JonesC.MeyerR. E.SvejenovaS. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organizational studies. Organization Studies, 39(5–6), 597–616.
17.
BünzliF.EpplerM. J.Stanoevska-SlabevaK.HoferA. (2024). Expressing demands or offers: How to promote volunteering using visual and verbal appeals. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(3), 502–523.
18.
BurgessL. R. (1971). Presenting ideas [Review of the book The new oratory, by A. Jay]. Monthly Labor Review, 94(12), 87.
19.
CarpenterC. R. (1971). Instructional film research—A brief review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 229–246.
20.
CarrollN. (1982). The future of allusion: Hollywood in the seventies (and beyond). October, 20(1), 51–81.
21.
CleeseJ. (Writer), JayA. (Writer) RobinsonP. (Director). (1972). Who sold you this, then? [film]. Video Arts.
FormanM. (1988). Making light of business. American Way, 21(6), 41–44.
27.
FossS. K. (2009). Framing the study of visual rhetoric: Toward a transformation of rhetorical theory. In HillC. A.HelmersM. (Eds.). Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 303–313). Routledge. (Original work published 2004)
28.
FossS. K.GriffinC. L. (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 2–18.
29.
FossS. K.WatersW. J. C.ArmadaB. J. (2007). Toward a theory of agentic orientation: Rhetoric and agency in Run Lola Run. Communication Theory, 17(3), 205–230.
30.
FrostD.JayA. (1967a). The English. Avon.
31.
FrostD.JayA. (1967b). To England with love. Hodder & Stoughton.
32.
GattiM. C. (2011). The language of competence in corporate histories for company websites. Journal of Business Communication, 48(4), 482–502.
33.
GerstnerT.TaylorK. P.MoonL.ButskiN. (2024). The language of crowdfunding: An exploratory study of entrepreneurial and other campaigns. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(3), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231183933
34.
GogginM. D. (2009). Visual rhetoric in pens of steel and inks of silk: Challenging the great visual/verbal divide. In HillC. A.HelmersM. (Eds.). Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 87–110). Routledge. (Original work published 2004)
35.
GoranssonK.FagerholmA.-S. (2018). Towards visual strategic communications: An innovative interdisciplinary perspective on visual dimensions within the strategic communications field. Journal of Communication Management, 22(1), 46–66.
36.
GrayD. J. (Ed.). (2013). Alice in wonderland [Norton critical edition] (3rd. ed.). W. W. Norton.
37.
GreenhillL. P.CarpenterC. R. (1953). Some characteristics of effective teaching films. Medical and Biological Illustration, 3(1), 30–36.
GroeningS. (2011). “We can see ourselves as others see us”: Women workers and Western Union’s training films in the 1920s. In AclandC. R.WassonH. (Eds.). Useful cinema (pp. 34–58). Duke University Press.
40.
GroggW. (1972). The importance of business writing to the student—A businessman’s viewpoint. ABCA Bulletin, 35(2), 1–5.
41.
HannahM. A.LamC. (2017). Drawing from available means: Assessing the rhetorical dimensions of Facebook practice. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(3), 235–257.
42.
HedigerV.VonderauP. (2009). Record, rhetoric, rationalization: Industrial organization and film. In HedigerV.VonderauP. (Eds.), Films that work: Industrial film and the productivity of media (pp. 35–49). Amsterdam University Press.
43.
HelmersM.HillC. A. (2009). Introduction. In HillC. A.HelmersM. (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 1–23). Routledge. (Original work published 2004)
44.
HoekenH.RuikesL. (2005). Art for art’s sake? An exploratory study of the possibility to align works of art with an organization’s identity. Journal of Business Communication, 42(3), 233–246.
45.
HoneyP. (1988). Managing problem people: Behavioural skills for leaders [booklet]. Video Arts.
46.
HoofF. (2020). Angels of efficiency: A media history of consulting (FairfaxD., Trans.). Oxford University Press.
47.
IedemaR. (2001). Analysing film and television: A social semiotic account of Hospital: An Unhealthy Business. In van LeeuwenT.JewittC. (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 183–204). Sage.
JamesonF. (1983). Postmodernism and consumer society. In FosterH. (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 111–125). Bay.
50.
JaworskaS. (2023). But then something happened: A critical multimodal genre analysis of corporate image repair videos. English for Specific Purposes, 69(1), 95–108.
51.
JayA. (1967). Management and Machiavelli: An inquiry into the politics of corporate life. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52.
JayA. (1971a). Corporation man. Random House.
53.
JayA. (1971b). Effective presentation: The communication of ideas by words and visual aids. Management Publications Limited.
54.
JayA. (1971c). The new oratory. American Management Association.
55.
JayA. (1976a). How to run a meeting. Harvard Business Review, 54(2), 43–57.
56.
JayA. (1976b). Slide rules [booklet]. Video Arts.
57.
JayA. (1977). The balance sheet barrier [booklet]. Video Arts.
58.
JayA. (1978). The control of working capital [booklet]. Video Arts.
59.
JayA. (1980). Cost, profit & break-even [booklet]. Video Arts.
60.
JayA. (1982). Making your case [booklet]. Video Arts.
61.
JayA. (2008). How to save the BBC. Centre for Policy Studies
62.
JayA. (Writer), & RobinsonP. (Director). (1977). The balance sheet barrier [film]. Video Arts.
63.
JayA. (Writer), & RobinsonP. (Director). (1978). The control of working capital [film]. Video Arts.
64.
JayA. (Writer), & RobinsonP. (Director). (1980). Cost, profit and break-even [film]. Video Arts.
65.
JayA. (Writer), & RobinsonP. (Director). (1982). Making your case [film]. Video Arts.
JayA.WilkinsB. (Directors). (1966). The future came yesterday [film]. JBM Productions and ICE Films.
68.
JeongE. (2021). Integrated communication through animated edutainment series: A case of Cha-ching. Business Communication Research and Practice, 4(2), 115–120.
69.
KimN. H. (2020). A digital education made personal: An examination of the impact of personalized business English education at Bayer Korea. Business Communication Research and Practice, 3(2), 112–121.
70.
KraigA. F.BarrazaJ. A.MontgomeryW.ZakP. J. (2022). The neurophysiology of corporate apologies: Why do people believe insincere apologies?International Journal of Business Communication, 59(4), 531–550.
71.
KupritzV. W.HillsmanT. (2011). The impact of the physical environment on supervisory communication skills transfer. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 148–185.
72.
LentzP. J.GetchellK. M. (2019). Introduction: Business communication at the intersection of rhetoric and pedagogy. In GetchellK. M.LentzP. J. (Eds.), Rhetorical theory and praxis in the business communication classroom (pp. 1–8). Routledge.
73.
LockerK. O.MillerS. L.RichardsonM.TebeauxE.YatesJ. (1996). Studying the history of business communicationJournal of Business Communication, 59(2), 109–127.
74.
MaierC. D.RavazzaniS. (2021). Framing diversity in corporate digital contexts: A multimodal approach to discursive recontextualizations of social practices. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(4), 463–489.
75.
MaloneE. A. (2019). “Don’t be a Dilbert”: Transmedia storytelling as technical communication during and after World War II. Technical Communication, 66(3), 209–229.
76.
MarchantH. (1977). Increasing the effectiveness of educational films: A selected review of research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 89–96.
77.
MargolisJ. (1992). Cleese encounters. St. Martin’s Press.
78.
MassonE. (2012). Watch and learn: Rhetorical devices in classroom films after 1940. Amsterdam University Press.
79.
MayM. A.LumsdaineA. A. (with HadsellR. S.GladstoneA. I.HowellJ. J.). (1958). Learning from films. Yale University Press.
80.
MeyerR. E.HöllererM. A.JancsaryD.van LeeuwenT. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 489–555.
81.
MillerC. R. (2017). “Where do genres come from?” In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 1–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
MillerC. R.DevittA. J.GallagherV. J. (2018). Genre: Permanence and change. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 48(3), 269–277.
83.
MitchellW. T. J. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. University of Chicago Press.
84.
MolloyK. A.HeathR. G. (2014). Bridge discourses and organizational ideologies: Managing spiritual and secular communication in a faith-based, nonprofit organization. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(4), 386–408.
85.
MoodyP. (2018). EMI Films and the limits of British cinema. Palgrave Macmillan.
86.
MorrealeS.BacklundP.SparksL. (2014). Communication education and instructional communication: Genesis and evolution as fields of inquiry. Communication Education, 63(4), 344–354.
87.
MozahemN. A. (2021). The online marketplace for business education: An exploratory study. International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), Article 100544.
88.
MüllerM. G. (2007). What is visual communication? Past and future of an emerging field of communication research. Studies in Communication Sciences, 7(2), 7–34.
89.
MüllerM. G. (2008). Visual competence: A new paradigm for studying visuals in the social sciences?Visual Studies, 23(2), 101–112.
90.
OrwigM. L. (2019). Early penmen, secretaries, and gmail templates: A critical and historical approach to business communication genres. In GetchellK. M.LentzP. J. (Eds.), Rhetorical theory and praxis in the business communication classroom (pp. 9–26). Routledge.
91.
OstherrK. (2011). Health films, cold war, and the production of patriotic audiences. In AclandC. R.WassonH. (Eds.). Useful cinema (pp. 103–122). Duke University Press.
92.
O’SullivanS. (2018). This film is restricted: Training films of the British Security Service. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 38(2), 274–295.
93.
PenroseJ. M. (2008). Annual report graphic use: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Communication, 45(2), 158–180.
94.
PentlandB. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711–724.
95.
PerrinH. F. R. (with LongR. P.). (1971a). Focus the future: An introduction to long range corporate planning. Management Publications.
96.
PerrinH. F. R. (1971b). Management training film on long range planning. Long Range Planning, 4(2), 67–69.
97.
PetrieR. C. (1975). How to develop training films. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 16(3), 61–65, 69.
98.
PrinzmetalW.ZvinyatskovskiyA.GutierrezP.DilemL. (2009). Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: The effects of perceptual difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(2), 352–369.
99.
RajandranK. (2021). The multimodal construction of corporate performance: An analysis of earnings videos. Ibérica, 42, 139–162.
100.
RawlinsJ. D. (2014). Mythologizing change: Examining rhetorical myth as a strategic change management discourse. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 453–472.
101.
ReinschP. N.ReinschN. L.Jr. (2017). From witness box to the bench: Meetings, Bloody Meetings, Video Arts, and the evolution of John Cleese. In ReinschP. N.WhitfieldB. L.WeinerR. G. (Eds.), Python beyond Python: Critical engagements with culture (pp. 109–132). Palgrave Macmillan.
102.
ReinschP. N.WhitfieldB. L.WeinerR. G. (Eds.). (2017). Python beyond Python: Critical engagements with culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
103.
RosenthalA. (1971). The new documentary in action: A casebook in film making. University of California Press.
104.
RossS. E. (2021). An exploration of organizational leaders’ perception of issues impacting corporate training programs [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Keiser University.
SpinuzziC.ZachryM. (2000). Genre ecologies: An open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 169–181.
107.
St. JohnBIIIArnettR. (2014). The National Association of Manufacturers’ community relations short filmYour Town: Parable, propaganda, and big individualism. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(2), 103–116.
108.
StephensK. K.BarrettA. K. (2016). Communicating briefly: Technically. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 398-418.
109.
StremmelR. (2009). The desiderata of business-film research. In HedigerV.VonderauP. (Eds.), Films that work: Industrial film and the productivity of media (pp. 463–469). Amsterdam University Press.
110.
ThelenP. D.MenL. R. (2023). Commentary: The role of internal communication in fostering employee advocacy: An exploratory study. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(4), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420975832
111.
ThrallsC. (1991). Bridging visual and verbal communication: Training videos and written instructional texts. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21(3), 285–306.
112.
ThrallsC. (1992). Rites and ceremonials: Corporate video and the construction of social realities in modern organizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(4), 381–402.
113.
TodorovT. (1976). The origin of genres (R. M. Berrong, Trans.). New Literary History, 8(1), 159–170.
114.
TraversR. M. W. (with McCormickM. C.NelsonF. B.ReidI. E.Van MondfransA. P.Van WagenenK. R.). (1967). Research and theory related to audiovisual information transmission (rev. ed.). Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 081 245).
115.
TripathiA.GhoshM.BhartiK. (2022). Analyzing the uncharted territory of monetizing scam videos on YouTube. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), Article 119.
116.
van den BoschA. L. M.de JongM. D. T.ElvingW. J. L. (2006). Managing corporate visual identity: Exploring the differences between manufacturing and service, and profit-making and nonprofit organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 43(2), 138–157.
117.
Video Arts. (1984). So you think you can manage? (Introduction by A. Jay). Methuen.
118.
VielhaberM. E.WaltmanJ. L. (2008). Changing uses of technology: Crisis communication responses in a faculty strike. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3), 308–330.
119.
WallerR. L.IluzadaC. L. (2020). Blackfish and SeaWorld: A case study in the framing of a crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(2), 227–243.
120.
WalterN.MurphyS. T.FrankL. B.Baezconde-GarbanatiL. (2017). Each medium tells a different story: The effect of message channel on narrative persuasion. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 161–170.
121.
WiesenbergM.VerčičD. (2021). The status quo of the visual turn in public relations practice. Communications, 46(2), 229–252.
122.
WijnkerW.BakkerA.SchukajlowS.DrijversP. (2021). Modeling the mechanisms of interest raising videos in education. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(5), 823–831.
123.
WilliamsM.BiggemannS. (2023). Corporate art collections in Australia: The influence of Aboriginal art on corporate identity. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(2), 656–677.
124.
WittichW. A.SchullerC. F. (1973). Instructional technology: Its nature and use (5th ed.). Harper & Row.
125.
YanowD. (2014). Methodological ways of seeing and knowing. In BellE.WarrenS.SchroederJ. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to visual organization (pp. 165–187). Routledge.
126.
YatesJ. (1993). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Johns Hopkins University Press.
127.
ZachryM. (2000). Communication practices in the workplace: A historical examination of genre development. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(1), 57–79.
128.
ZimmermannY. (2009). “What Hollywood is to America, the corporate film is to Switzerland”: Remarks on industrial film as utility film. In HedigerV.VonderauP. (Eds.), Films that work: Industrial film and the productivity of media (pp. 101–117). Amsterdam University Press.
