Innovation is critical to the growth and prosperity of an organization. In daily work, everyday innovation is more often developed by employees than large-scale institutional innovation. This research builds a multi-level framework to investigate how leader motivating language (LML) influences the everyday innovative behavior of employees in the international freight forwarding industry. In addition, we examined the mediating effect of individual-level self-leadership and psychological capital (PsyCap). We used HLM6.8 to perform hierarchical linear modeling on 551 valid questionnaires from 88 teams. The results showed that: (1) LML was a positive predictor of employees’ innovative behaviors, (2) LML positively affects employees’ self-leadership and PsyCap, and (3) self-leadership and PsyCap partially mediated the relationship between LML and employees’ innovative behaviors. We also used Mplus8.3 to conduct a multi-level path analysis to verify the robustness of the results. Further, we investigated the sequential mediation effects of self-leadership and PsyCap between LML and innovative behavior. These findings complement existing research and emphasize the importance of motivational language in organizational management.
AmankwaaA.GyensareM. A.SusomrithP. (2019). Transformational leadership with innovative behaviour: Examining multiple mediating paths with PLS-SEM. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 402–420.
2.
BaerM.FreseM. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.
3.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
4.
BassB. M.YammarinoF. J. (1991). Congruence of self and others’ leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied psychology, 40(4), 437–454.
5.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.
7.
CarmeliA.MeitarR.WeisbergJ. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75–90.
8.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
9.
CurralL.Marques-QuinteiroP. (2009). Self-leadership and work role innovation: Testing a mediation model with goal orientation and work motivation. Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 25(2), 165–176.
10.
DiLielloT. C.HoughtonJ. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: Toward a model of self-leadership, innovation and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 319–337.
11.
DruckerP. (1999). Financial services: Innovate or die. The Economist, 352, 25–28.
12.
FanK. T.ChenY. H.WangC. W.ChenM. (2014). E-leadership effectiveness in virtual teams: Motivating language perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(3), 421–437.
13.
FleenorJ. W.McCauleyC. D.BrutusS. (1996). Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 487–506.
14.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
15.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
16.
GhoshK. (2015). Developing organizational creativity and innovation: Toward a model of self-leadership, employee creativity, creativity climate and workplace innovative orientation. Management Research Review, 38(11), 1126–1148.
17.
GomesC.CurralL.CaetanoA. (2015). The mediating effect of work engagement on the relationship between self-leadership and individual innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(1), 1550009.
18.
GundayG.UlusoyG.KilicK.AlpkanL. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662–676.
19.
GuoY.LingB. (2020). Effects of leader motivating language on employee task and contextual performance: The mediating role of feedback quality. Psychological Reports, 123(6), 2501–2518.
20.
GuptaB.SinghR.PuriS.RawatP. (2020). Psychological capital and performance: Roles of thought self-leadership, engagement, and feedback. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020(1), 19263.
21.
Gutierrez-WirschingS.MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.WangW. (2015). Motivating language as a mediator between servant leadership and employee outcomes. Management Research Review, 38(12), 1234–1250.
22.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. JAndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.
23.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (2011). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model (Correction). Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 182.
24.
HankeD. (2021). Can employees motivate themselves? The link between peer motivating language and employee outcomes. The International Trade Journal, 35(1), 19–39.
25.
HarunavamweM.NelP.Van ZylE. (2020). The influence of self-leadership strategies, psychological resources, and job embeddedness on work engagement in the banking industry. South African Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 507–519.
26.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
27.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
28.
HolmesW. T. (2016). Motivating language theory: Antecedent variables–Critical to both the success of leaders and organizations. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 30(3), 13–16.
29.
HolmesW. T.ParkerM. A. (2017). Communication: Empirically testing behavioral integrity and credibility as antecedents for the effective implementation of motivating language. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 70–82.
30.
HolmesW. T.ParkerM. A. (2019). Motivating language intensity: A study of Wyoming superintendents motivating language use as perceived by their principals. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419868520
31.
HolmesW. T.ScullW. R. (2019). Reframing organizations through leadership communications: The four frames of leadership viewed through motivating language. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 33(5), 16–19.
32.
HoughtonJ. D.DawleyD.DiLielloT. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 216–232.
33.
HoughtonJ. D.NeckC. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672–691.
34.
HsuM. L.ChenF. H. (2017). The cross-level mediating effect of psychological capital on the organizational innovation climate–employee innovative behavior relationship. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 128–139.
35.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
36.
KalyarM. N. (2011). Creativity, self-leadership and individual innovation. The Journal of Commerce, 3(3), 20–28.
37.
KimD. W. (2014). Research on factors affecting government employee innovative behavior intention: A focus on empowering leadership and self-leadership for enhancing innovative behavior intentions. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 52(1), 35–62.
38.
KimH. YParkS. M. (2017). An empirical exploration of the effects of internal and external organizational conflicts on quality of life and organizational citizenship behavior: With a focus on analyzing positive psychological capital within Korean executive Agencies. Korean Review of Organizational Studies, 14(1), 27–65.
39.
KimM. S.KooD. W. (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3044–3062.
40.
KlineR. B. (1998). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guildord Press.
41.
KotzéM. (2018). The influence of psychological capital, self-leadership, and mindfulness on work engagement. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 279–292.
42.
LingB.GuoY. (2020). Affective and cognitive trust as mediators in the influence of leader motivating language on personal initiative. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420915503
43.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall.
44.
LuthansF.AvolioB. J.AveyJ. B.NormanS. M. (2007a). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personal Psychology, 60(1), 541–572.
45.
LuthansF.YoussefC. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2),143–160
46.
LuthansF.YoussefC. M.AvolioB. J. (2007b). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge (Vol. 198). Oxford University Press.
47.
MadlockP. E. (2013). The influence of motivational language in the technologically mediated realm of telecommuters. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(2), 196–210.
48.
ManzC. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585–600.
49.
MayfieldJ. (2009). Motivating language: A meaningful guide for leader communications. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 23(1), 9–11.
50.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2007). The effects of leader communication on a worker’s intent to stay: An investigation using structural equation modeling. Human Performance, 20(2), 85–102.
51.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2009). The role of leader motivating language in employee absenteeism. International Journal of Business Communication, 46(4), 455–479.
52.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2010). Leader-level influence on motivating language: A two-level model investigation on worker performance and job satisfaction. Competitiveness Review, 20(5), 407–422.
53.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. (2012). The relationship between leader motivating language and self-efficacy: A partial least squares model analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 357–376.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM. R.KopfJ. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 37(3–4), 235–248.
56.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.NeckC. P. (2021). Speaking to the self: How motivating language links with self-leadership. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(1), 31–54.
57.
MayfieldJ.MayfieldM.SharbroughW. C. (2015). Strategic vision and values in top leaders’ communications: Motivating language at a higher level. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 97–121.
58.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2004). The effects of leader communication on worker innovation. American Business Review, 22(2), 46.
59.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2016a). The effects of leader motivating language use on employee decision making. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 465–484.
60.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2016b). Growing self-leaders: The role of motivating language. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 30(5), 14–17.
61.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2017). Leader talk and the creative spark: A research note on how leader motivating language use influences follower creative environment perceptions. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 210–225.
62.
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2021). Sound and safe: The role of leader motivating language and follower self-leadership in feelings of psychological safety. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 51.
63.
NawazM.AbidG.AryaB.BhattiG. A.FarooqiS. (2020). Understanding employee thriving: The role of workplace context, personality and individual resources. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(11–12), 1345–1362.
64.
NeckC. P.HoughtonJ. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270–295.
65.
NeckC. P.NouriH.GodwinJ. L. (2003). How self-leadership affects the goal-setting process. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 691–707.
66.
NguyenC. N.NingW.AlikajA.TranQ. N. (2021). Motivating language and employee outcomes: A multinational investigation. Management Research Review, 44(2), 268–289.
67.
NolzenN. (2018). The concept of psychological capital: A comprehensive review. Management Review Quarterly, 68(3), 237–277.
68.
OldhamG. R.FriedY. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35.
69.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
70.
SameerY. M. (2018). Innovative behavior and psychological capital: Does positivity make any difference?Journal of Economics & Management, 32(2), 75–101.
71.
SarrosJ. C.LucaE.DenstenI.SantoraJ. C. (2014). Leaders and their use of motivating language. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 226–240.
72.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
73.
SeligmanM. E. P.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
74.
ShaneS.LockeE. A.CollinsC. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257–279.
75.
ShankerR.BhanugopanR.Van der HeijdenB. I.FarrellM. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77.
76.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multi-level analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multi-level modeling. SAGE.
77.
StewartG. L.CourtrightS. H.ManzC. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multi-level review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185–222.
78.
SullivanJ. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 104–115.
79.
SunP. C.PanF. T.HoC. W. (2016). Does motivating language matter in leader–subordinate communication?Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(3), 264–282.
80.
SunY.HuangJ. (2019). Psychological capital and innovative behavior: Mediating effect of psychological safety. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(9), 1–7.
81.
TengbladS. (2006). Is there a ‘new managerial work’? A comparison with Henry Mintzberg’s classic study 30 years later. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1437–1461.
82.
TorresE. M.EhrhartM. G.BeidasR. S.FarahnakL. R.FinnN. K.AaronsG. A. (2018). Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) with supervisors’ self-ratings. Community Mental Health Journal, 54(1), 49–53.
83.
UsmanovaN.YangJ.SumarliahE.KhanS. U.KhanS. Z. (2021). Impact of knowledge sharing on job satisfaction and innovative work behavior: The moderating role of motivating language. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(3), 515–532.
84.
WangC. W.HsiehC. T.FanK. T.MenefeeM. L. (2009). Impact of motivating language on team creative performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 133–140.
85.
WeickK. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. SAGE.
86.
YesilS.SozbilirF. (2013). An empirical investigation into the impact of personality on individual innovation behaviour in the workplace. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 540–551.
87.
YuklG. A. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
88.
YuanF.WoodmanR. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.
