This study explored how job seekers perceived human and technological sources in their sociotechnical ego-networks. United States residents (N = 285) who had sought jobs in the past 2 years responded to questions about their perceptions of sources used during the job search (n = 1297). Participants rated each source they used across a variety of perceived attributes. We measured tie strength using an amalgam of frequency of interaction and closeness, and strong tie sources included humans contacted online and in-person as well as websites. In contrast, the weakest tie sources were direct online application, employment agencies, and career events. Results showed a newly developed perceived bridging scale, social support, ease of access, and homophily were all positively related to tie strength. Influence was negatively related to tie strength. Information quality was not related to tie strength. We discuss implications for network and job search research, theory, and practice.
AndersenP. A.de MancillasW. R. T. (1978). Scales for the measurement of homophily with public figures. Southern Journal of Communication, 43, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
4.
BarbulescuR. (2015). The strength of many kinds of ties: Unpacking the role of social contacts across stages of the job search process. Organization Science, 26, 1040–1058. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0978
BianY.HuangX. (2015). The guanxi influence on occupational attainment in urban China. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 1, 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X15593709
7.
BolíbarM.VerdJ. M.BarrancoO. (2019). The downward spiral of youth unemployment: An approach considering social networks and family background. Work, Employment and Society, 33, 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018822918
8.
BruggemanJ. (2016). The strength of varying tie strength: Comment on Aral and Van Alstyne. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.1086/686267
9.
BurkeM.KrautR. (2013). Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1419–1430). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441936
10.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
11.
BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
12.
ChenW. (2014). The Internet implications for social capital: Stock, changes and tie strength. In LinN.FuY-C.ChenC-J. J. (Eds.), Social capital and its institutional contingencies: A study of the United States, China, and Taiwan (pp. 150–168). Routledge.
13.
CheungJ. H.BurnsD. K.SinclairR. R.SliterM. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5
14.
ContractorN.MongeP.LeonardiP. M. (2011). Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing technology inside the network. International Journal of Communication, 5, 682–720.
15.
CormanS. R.ScottC. R. (1994). Perceived networks, activity foci, and observable communication in social collectives. Communication Theory, 4, 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00089.x
16.
CrossleyN.BellottiE.EdwardsG.EverettM. G.KoskinenJ.TranmerM. (2015). Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets. Sage.
17.
FetherstonM. (2019). What influences college students’ career information seeking on the internet? A test of the comprehensive model of information seeking. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1615631
18.
FieselerC.MeckelM.MüllerS. (2014). With a little help of my peers. The supportive role of online contacts for the unemployed. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.017
GächterS.StarmerC.TufanoF. (2015). Measuring the closeness of relationships: A comprehensive evaluation of the ‘Inclusion of the Other in the Self’ scale. PloS One, 10(6), e0129478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129478
21.
GargR.TelangR. (2018). To be or not to be linked: Online social networks and job search by unemployed workforce. Management Science, 64, 3926–3941. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2784
22.
GeeL. K.JonesJ. J.BurkeM. (2017). Social networks and labor markets: How strong ties relate to job finding on Facebook’s social network. Journal of Labor Economics, 35, 485–518. http://doi:10.1086/686225
23.
Gist-MackeyA. N. (2018). (Dis)embodied Job Search Communication Training: Comparative critical ethnographic analysis of materiality and discourse during the unequal search for work. Organization Studies, 39, 1251–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736936
24.
GossettL. M.KilkerJ. (2006). My job sucks examining counterinstitutional web sites as locations for organizational member voice, dissent, and resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318906291729
25.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
26.
GranovetterM. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
27.
GranovetterM. S. (1974[1995]). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago Press.
28.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
29.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
30.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8, 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185
31.
KimS.KandampullyJ.BilgihanA. (2018). The influence of eWOM communications: An application of online social network framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.015
32.
KuhnP.MansourH. (2014). Is internet job search still ineffective?The Economic Journal, 124(581), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12119
33.
LazarsfeldP. F.MertonR. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18, 18–66.
34.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
35.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
MarinA. (2012). Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, when they do, and why it matters. Social Networks, 34, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.002
38.
MarsdenP. V.CampbellK. E. (2012). Reflections on conceptualizing and measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 91, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos112
39.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P.DalyJ. A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x
40.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
41.
MouwT. (2003). Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter?American Sociological Review, 68(6), 868–898. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519749
42.
MukoyamaT.PattersonC.ŞahinA. (2018). Job search behavior over the business cycle. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10, 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20160202
43.
NikolaouI. (2014). Social networking web sites in job search and employee recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12067
44.
ObukhovaE.LanG. (2013). Do job seekers benefit from contacts? A direct test with contemporaneous searches. Management Science, 59, 2204–2216. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1701
45.
Oeldorf-HirschA.HechtB.MorrisM. R.TeevanJ.GergleD. (2014). To search or to ask: the routing of information needs between traditional search engines and social networks. In Proceedings of the CSCW’14 (pp. 16–27). ACM.
46.
O’ReillyC. A. (1982). Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.2307/256097
47.
PentlandB. T.FeldmanM. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18, 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001
48.
PiercyC. W.LeeS. K. (2019). A typology of job search sources: Exploring the changing nature of job search behavior. New Media & Society, 21, 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818808071
RozzellB.PiercyC. W.CarrC. T.KingS.LaneB. L.TornesM.JohnsonA. J.WrightK. B. (2014). Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.006
51.
ShankD. B. (2016). Using crowdsourcing websites for sociological research: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. The American Sociologist, 47, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9266-9
52.
ShumateM.PilnyA.AtoubaY.KimJ.Peña-y-LilloM.CooperK. R.SahagunA.YangS. (2013). A taxonomy of communication networks. Communication Yearbook, 37, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203551943-11
53.
SmithS. S. (2012). Why weak ties’ help and strong ties’ don’t: reconsidering why tie strength matters (used with permission). IRLE Working Paper No. 137-12. http://irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/137-12.pdf
54.
SuC.ContractorN. (2011). A multidimensional network approach to studying team members’ information seeking from human and digital knowledge sources in consulting firms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21526
55.
SunX.ZhaoY. C.ZhuQ. (2015). Developing the measurement scale of information quality for social Q&A sites. In PACIS 2015 Proceedings, Paper 15. Association for Information Systems.
56.
SundarS. S.OhJ.KangH.SreenivasanA. (2013). How does technology persuade? Theoretical mechanisms for persuasive technologies. In DillardJ. P.ShenL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 388–404). Sage.
57.
WanbergC. R.AliA. A.CsillagB. (2020). Job seeking: The process and experience of looking for a job. Annual Reivew of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044939
WatzlawickP.BavelasJ. B.JacksonD. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. Norton & Co.
60.
YakubovichV. (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review, 70, 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000303
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
