International dispersed (virtual) teams are becoming increasingly prevalent in complex international business environments, and their ability to handle internal communication is critical to their performance. Modern information and communication technology offer a variety of media to support team communication. Nonetheless, research is trailing behind practice and offers no established framework to explain media use in contemporary teams. Here, we seek to address this void. In a comparative study of domestic and international teams’ choice of media, we extend media-richness theory by focusing on the construct of complexity. Using structural equation modelling and multigroup analysis to assess a multinational sample of 285 project teams, we find partial support for media-richness theory and demonstrate the specific relevance of this theory to the study of communication in international teams. Complexity affects international teams more strongly than domestic teams, prompting international teams to intensify their use of rich and semirich communication media to an extent not observed in domestic teams.
AçıkgözA.GünselA.KuzeyC.SeçginG. (2016). Functional diversity, absorptive capability and product success: The moderating role of project complexity in new product development teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25, 90-109. doi:10.1111/caim.12155
2.
AlsharoM.GreggD.RamirezR. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management, 54, 479-490. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005
3.
AmbosT. C.AmbosB.EichK. J.PuckJ. (2016). Imbalance and isolation: How team configurations affect global knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 22, 316-332. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2016.03.005
4.
AnconaD. G.CaldwellD. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.321
5.
ArgoteL.IngramP. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 150-169. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
6.
ArmengolX.FernandezV.SimoP.SallanJ. M. (2017). An examination of the effects of self-regulatory focus on the perception of the media richness: The case of e-mail. International Journal of Business Communication, 54, 394-407. doi:10.1177/2329488415572780
7.
BaccariniD. (1996). The concept of project complexity: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14, 201-204. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
8.
BachmannA. S. (2006). Melting pot or tossed salad? Implications for designing effective multicultural workgroups. Management International Review, 46, 721-748. doi:10.1007/s11575-006-0124-4
9.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
10.
BagozziR. P.YiY.PhillipsL. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458. doi:10.2307/2393203
11.
BaralouE.TsoukasH. (2015). How is new organizational knowledge created in a virtual context? An ethnographic study. Organization Studies, 36, 593-620. doi:10.1177/0170840614556918
12.
BechkyB. A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3-21. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0149
13.
BeckerJ.-M.RaiA.RingleC. M.VölcknerF. (2013). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37, 665-694. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.01
BreuK.HemingwayC. J. (2004). Making organisations virtual: The hidden cost of distributed teams. Journal of Information Technology, 19, 191-202. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000018
16.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
17.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-847. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
18.
ChenY. Y.YehS. P.HuangH. L. (2012). Does knowledge management “fit” matter to business performance?Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 671-687. doi:10.1108/13673271211262745
19.
ChinW. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Esposito VinziV.ChinW. W.HenselerJ.WangH. (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655-690). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
20.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Philadelphia: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
DaftR. (1992). Organization theory and design (4th ed.). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
22.
DavisonA. C.HinkleyD. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
DayanM.OzerM.AlmazroueiH. (2017). The role of functional and demographic diversity on new product creativity and the moderating impact of project uncertainty. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 144-154. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.016
24.
De Saa-PerezP.Diaz-DiazN. L.Aguiar-DiazI.Ballesteros-RodriguezJ. L. (2017). How diversity contributes to academic research teams performance. R&D Management, 47, 165-179. doi:10.1111/radm.12139
25.
DennisA. R.FullerR. M.ValacichJ. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 575-600. doi:10.2307/25148857
EdenL.MillerS. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In HittM. A.ChengJ. L. C. (Eds.), Theories of the multinational enterprise: Diversity, complexity and relevance (Advances in International Management, Vol. 16, pp. 187-221). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
28.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. (1986). Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science, 1, 54-75. doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815
29.
EvermannJ.TateM. (2016). Assessing the predictive performance of structural equation model estimators. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4565-4582. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.050
30.
FellowsR.LiuA. (2016). Sensemaking in the cross-cultural contexts of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 246-257. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.010
31.
GeraldiJ.MaylorH.WilliamsT. (2011). Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 966-990. doi:10.1108/01443571111165848
32.
GeraldiJ. G.AdlbrechtG. (2007). On faith, fact, and interaction in projects: Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 32-43. doi:10.1177/875697280703800104
GibsonC. B.HuangL.KirkmanB. L.ShapiroD. L. (2014). Where global and virtual meet: The value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first-century teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 217-244. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091240
35.
GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T.YoungN. C. J.VartiainenM.HakonenM. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 Years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313-1337. doi:10.1177/0149206314559946
36.
GoodhueD. L.ThompsonR. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213-236. doi:10.2307/249689
37.
GoodmanR. A.GoodmanL. P. (1976). Some management issues in temporary systems: A study of professional development and manpower-the theater case. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 494-501. doi:10.2307/2391857
38.
HairJ. F.Jr.HultG. T. M.RingleC.SarstedtM. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
HairJ. F.Jr.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.GuderganS. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
HanischB.WaldA. (2014). Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30, 197-213. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.005
41.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33, 405-431. doi:10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304
42.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SinkovicsR. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In SinkovicsR. R.GhauriP. N. (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-320). Bingley, England: Emerald.
43.
HorwitzS. K.HorwitzI. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987-1015. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587
44.
HutzschenreuterT.KleindienstI.LangeS. (2016). The concept of distance in international business research: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 160-179. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12065
45.
HuysmanM.SteinfieldC.JangC.-Y.DavidK.PootJ.MulderI. (2003). Virtual teams and the appropriation of communication technology: Exploring the concept of media stickiness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 411-436. doi:10.1023/A:1026145017609
46.
HymerS. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1960)
47.
IsariD.PontiggiaA.ViriliF. (2016). Working with tweets vs. working with chats: An experiment on collaborative problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 130-140. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.052
48.
IvesB.JarvenpaaS. L.MasonR. O. (1993). Global business drivers: Aligning information technology to global business strategy. IBM Systems Journal, 32, 143-161. doi:10.1147/sj.321.0143
49.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA.ErhardtN. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00080-1
50.
JarvenpaaS. L.IvesB. (1994). The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(4), 25-57. doi:10.1080/07421222.1994.11518019
51.
JarvenpaaS. L.ShawT. R.StaplesD. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15, 250-267. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0028
52.
JarvenpaaS. L.StaplesD. S. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 129-154. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00042-1
KellerR. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
55.
KetokiviM. A.SchroederR. G. (2004). Perceptual measures of performance: fact or fiction?Journal of Operations Management, 22, 247-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2002.07.001
56.
KishiM. (2008). Perceptions and use of electronic media: Testing the relationship between organizational interpretation differences and media richness. Information & Management, 45, 281-287. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.02.008
57.
KlitmøllerA.LauringJ. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48, 398-406. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.023
58.
KochP. T.KochB.MenonT.ShenkarO. (2016). Cultural friction in leadership beliefs and foreign-invested enterprise survival. Journal of International Business Studies, 47, 453-470. doi:10.1057/jibs.2016.16
59.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101
LewinA. Y.ChiuC.-Y.FeyC. F.LevineS. S.McDermottG.MurmannJ. P.TsangE. (2016). The critique of empirical social science: New Policies at management and organization review. Management and Organization Review, 12, 649-658. doi:10.1017/mor.2016.43
62.
LindnerF.WaldA. (2011). Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 877-888. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.09.003
63.
LisakA.ErezM.SuiY.LeeC. (2016). The positive role of global leaders in enhancing multicultural team innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 47, 655-673. doi:10.1057/s41267-016-0002-7
64.
LuY.LuoL.WangH.LeY.ShiQ. (2015). Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 610-622. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.12.005
65.
LuoY.ShenkarO. (2011). Toward a perspective of cultural friction in international business. Journal of International Management, 17, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.001
66.
LytleA.BrettJ.BarsnessZ.TinsleyC.JanssensM. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organization behavior. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 17, pp. 167-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
67.
MaguireS. (2011). Constructing and appreciating complexity. In AllenP.MaguireS.McKelveyB. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of complexity and management (pp. 79-92): London, England: Sage.
MalhotraA.MajchrzakA. (2014). Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies. Human Relations, 67, 389-411. doi:10.1177/0018726713495284
70.
Martinez-ConesaI.Soto-AcostaP.CarayannisE. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21, 553-570. doi:10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0403
71.
MathieuJ.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
72.
MaylorH.VidgenR.CarverS. (2008). Managerial complexity in project-based operations: A grounded model and its implications for practice. Project Management Journal, 39(1), S15-S26. doi:10.1002/pmj.20057
73.
MaznevskiM. L.AthanassiouN. A. (2006). Guest editors’ introduction to the focused issue: A new direction for global teams research. MIR: Management International Review, 46, 631-645. doi:10.1007/s11575-006-0120-8
74.
MaznevskiM. L.ChudobaK. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-492. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
75.
MeyerK. E.van WitteloostuijnA.BeugelsdijkS. (2017). What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 535-551. doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0078-8
76.
MillikenF. J.MartinsL. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433. doi:10.2307/258667
77.
MortensenM.HaasM. R. (2018). Perspective: Rethinking teams: From bounded membership to dynamic participation. Organization Science, 29, 341-355. doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1198
78.
NarulaR. (2014). Exploring the paradox of competence-creating subsidiaries: Balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs. Long Range Planning, 47(1-2), 4-15. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.10.006
79.
OtondoR. F.Van ScotterJ. R.AllenD. G.PalviaP. (2008). The complexity of richness: Media, message, and communication outcomes. Information & Management, 45, 21-30. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.09.003
80.
PaugetB.WaldA. (2013). Relational competence in complex temporary organizations: The case of a French hospital construction project network. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 200-211. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.07.001
SarstedtM.RingleC. M. (2010). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modeling: A comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37, 1299-1318. doi:10.1080/02664760903030213
83.
SarstedtM.RingleC. M.HairJ. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In HomburgC. (Ed.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1-40). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
84.
SarstedtM.RingleC. M.HenselerJ.HairJ. F. (2014). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Planning, 47, 154-160. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.007
85.
SarstedtM.RingleC. M.RaithelS.GuderganS. P. (2014). In pursuit of understanding what drives fan satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 46, 419-447. doi:10.1080/00222216.2014.11950335
86.
SchwabD. P. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87.
ShachafP. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 45, 131-142. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003
88.
ShachafP.HaraN. (2007). Behavioral complexity theory of media selection: A proposed theory for global virtual teams. Journal of Information Science, 33, 63-75. doi:10.1177/0165551506068145
89.
ShenkarO. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 519-535. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982
90.
ShenkarO. (2012). Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 12-17. doi:10.1057/jibs.2011.42
91.
ShenkarO.LuoY.YeheskelO. (2008). From “distance” to “friction”: Substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research. Academy of Management Review, 33, 905-923. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.34421999
92.
ShmueliG.RayS.EstradaJ. M. V.ChatlaS. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4552-4564. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
93.
SimonH. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467-482.
94.
SosaM. E.EppingerS. D.PichM.McKendrickD. G.StoutS. K. (2002). Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: An empirical study in the telecommunications industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 45-58. doi:10.1109/17.985747
95.
Soto-AcostaP.PopaS.Palacios-MarquésD. (2017). Social web knowledge sharing and innovation performance in knowledge-intensive manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 425-440. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9498-z
96.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955
97.
StahlG. K.MaznevskiM. L.VoigtA.JonsenK. (2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 690-709. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.85
98.
StaplesD.ZhaoL. (2006). The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 389-406. doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9042-x
99.
SuhK. S. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35, 295-312. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00097-4
100.
TatikondaM. V.RosenthalS. R. (2000). Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 401-425. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00028-0
101.
TenzerH.PudelkoM. (2016). Media choice in multilingual virtual teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 47, 427-452. doi:10.1057/jibs.2016.13
102.
TheodorakopoulosN.BudhwarP. (2015). Guest editors’ introduction: Diversity and inclusion in different work settings: Emerging patterns, challenges, and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 54, 177-197. doi:10.1002/hrm.21715
103.
TyssenA. K.WaldA.SpiethP. (2014). The challenge of transactional and transformational leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 365-375. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.010
104.
van den HooffB.GrootJ.de JongeS. (2005). Situational influences on the use of communication technologies: A meta-analysis and exploratory study. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 4-27. doi:10.1177/0021943604271192
105.
WebsterJ.WongW. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: Identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 41-62. doi:10.1080/09585190701763883
106.
WeimannP.HinzC.ScottE.PollockM. (2010). Changing the communication culture of distributed teams in a world where communication is neither perfect nor complete. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 13, 187-196.
107.
WillabyH. W.CostaD. S. J.BurnsB. D.MacCannC.RobertsR. D. (2015). Testing complex models with small sample sizes: A historical overview and empirical demonstration of what Partial Least Squares (PLS) can offer differential psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 73-78. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.008
108.
YooY. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34, 213-231. doi:10.2307/20721425
109.
ZwikaelO.Unger-AviramE. (2010). HRM in project groups: The effect of project duration on team development effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 413-421. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.005
