“Going to Lunch”: The Role of Catch Phrases and Language in Constructing a Heteronormative Leadership Culture

Abstract

This study examines raw focus group data from a previous case study that demonstrated the existence of a heteronormative leadership paradigm, personified in the heteronormative ideal leader who is strong, agentic, charismatic, and typically White and male. The current study corroborated the findings from the previous case study, which contributes to even more profound meaning for the current study’s conclusions. For this study, the second author independently analyzed the data using a methodology that combines elements of discourse analysis and conversation analysis to identify what organizational cultural and identity messages are communicated by focus group participants. Through this methodological framework, the researchers found that catch phrases and language were used to construct personal and organizational identities integral to a heteronormative leadership culture despite the organization’s stated and intended dedication to being a “pro-woman” firm.

Keywords

accounting communication leadership glass ceiling conversation analysis discourse analysis heteronormative culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(1998). The future of “gender and organizations”: Connections and boundaries. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 31, 214-224. doi:10.1108/02610151211209072

Acker

(2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Gender, Work & Organization, 5, 195-206.

Addison

J. T.

Ozturk

O. D.

Wang

(2014). The role of gender in promotion and pay over a career. Journal of Human Capital, 8, 280-317.

AICPA. (2015). 2015 Trends in the supply of accounting graduates and the demand for public accounting recruits. Durham, NC: Author.

Almer

Lightbody

Single

(2012). Successful promotion or segregation from partnership? An examination of the “post-senior manager” position in public accounting and the implications for women’s careers. Accounting Forum, 36, 122-133. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.002

Anderson

Ahmad

King

Lindsey

Feyre

Ragone

Kim

(2015). The effectiveness of three strategies to reduce the influence of bias in evaluations of female leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 522-539.

Anderson-Gough

Grey

Robson

(2002). Accounting professional and the accounting profession: Linking conduct and context. Accounting and Business Research, 32(1), 41-56.

Anderson-Gough

Grey

Robson

(2005). “Helping them to forget”: The organizational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 469-490. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.003

Auster

Prasad

(2016). Why do women still not make it to the top? Dominant organizational ideologies and biases by promotion committees limit opportunities to destination positions. Sex Roles, 75, 177-196. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0607-0

10.

Bakke

Bean

(2006). The materiality of sensemaking. Tamara Journal, 5(3), 51-69.

11.

Berger

Luckmann

(1966). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Doubleday.

12.

Bierema

(2016). Women’s leadership: Troubling notions of the “ideal” (male) leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18, 119-136.

13.

Broadbent

Kirkham

(2008). Glass ceilings, glass cliffs or new worlds? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 465-473.

14.

Castro

(2012). Time demands and gender roles: The case of a big four firm in Mexico. Gender Work & Organization, 19, 532-554. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00606.x

15.

Castro

Holvino

(2016). Applying intersectionality in organizations: Inequity markers, cultural scripts and advancement practices in a professional services firm. Gender Work & Organization, 23, 328-347. doi:10.1111/gwao.12129

16.

Catalyst. (2014). 2013 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women executive officers and top earners. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/research/2013-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-executive-officers-and-top-earners/

17.

Clifton

(2012). A discursive approach to leadership: Doing assessments and managing organizational meanings. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 148-168. doi:10.1177/0021943612437762

18.

Cook

Glass

(2014). Women and top leadership positions: Towards and institutional analysis. Gender, Work & Organization, 21, 91-103. doi:10.1111/gwao.12018

19.

Crotty

(2003). The foundations of social research, meaning and perspective in the research process. London, England: Sage. (Original work published 1998)

20.

Cullen

Christopher

(2012). Career progression of female accountants in the state public sector. Australian Accounting Review, 22, 68-85. doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00159.x

21.

Dalton

D. R.

Hill

J. W.

Ramsay

R. J.

(1997). Women as managers and partners: Context specific predictors of turnover in international public accounting firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16(1), 29-50.

22.

Dalton

Cohen

J. R.

Harp

N. L.

McMillan

J. J.

(2014). Antecedents and consequences of perceived gender discrimination in the audit profession. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(3), 1-32.

23.

DeRue

Ashford

(2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627-647.

24.

Diehl

Dzubinski

(2016). Making the invisible visible: A cross-sector analysis of gender-based leadership barriers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27, 181-206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21248

25.

Diekman

Goodfriend

Goodwin

(2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201-215.

26.

Duck

Pond

(1989). Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your retrospective data: Rhetoric and reality in personal relationships. In Hendrick

(Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 3-27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

27.

Eubanks

(2012). Feminist phronesis and technologies of citizenship. In Flyvbjerg

Landman

Schram

(Eds.), Real social science, applied phronesis (pp. 228-245). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Fitch

K. L.

(1994). Criteria for evidence in qualitative research. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 32-38.

29.

Flyvbjerg

(2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Ford

Harding

Learmonth

(2008). Leadership as identity: Constructions and deconstructions. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

31.

Friedman

(2015). Perceptual construction: Rereading the social construction of reality through the sociology of the senses. Cultural Sociology, 10, 1-16. doi:10.1177/1749975515615149

32.

Goldsmith

D. J.

Baxter

L. A.

(1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23, 87-114.

33.

Harro

(2000). The cycle of socialization. In Adams

Blumenfeld

W. J.

Castañeda

C. R.

Hackman

H. W.

Peters

M. L.

Zúñiga

(Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (pp. 45-52). New York, NY: Routledge.

34.

Haynes

(2008). Moving the gender agenda or stirring chicken entrails? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 539-555. doi:10.1108/09513570810872914

35.

Haynes

(2012). Body beautiful? Gender, identity and the body in professional service firms. Gender, Work & Organization, 19, 489-507. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00583.x

36.

Haynes

(2013). Sexuality and sexual symbolism as processes of gendered identity: An autoethnography of an accounting firm formation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26, 374-398. doi:10.1108/09513571311311865

37.

Heritage

Atkinson

J. M.

(1984). Introduction. In Atkinson

J. M.

Heritage

(Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Hersted

Frimann

(2016). Constructing leadership identities through stories. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 14, 149-162.

39.

Hewlett

Luce

(2005, March). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2005/03/off-ramps-and-on-ramps-keeping-talented-women-on-the-road-to-success

40.

Hoobler

Lemmon

Wayne

(2014). Women’s managerial aspirations: An organizational development perspective. Journal of Management, 40, 703-730. doi:10.1177/0149206311426911

41.

Johnson

E. N.

Lowe

D. J.

Reckers

P. M. J.

(2008). Alternative work arrangements and perceived career success: Current evidence from the big four firms, in the US. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 48-72.

42.

Kaiser

Wallace

(2016). Gender bias and substantive differences in ratings of leadership behavior: Toward a new narrative. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 6, 72-98 doi:10.1037/cpb0000059

43.

Kiser

(2015). Workplace and leadership perceptions between men and women. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30, 598-612. doi:10.1108/GM-11-2014-0097

44.

Ladkin

(2010). Rethinking leadership: A new look at old leadership questions. Northampton, MA: Edgar Elgar.

45.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Levinson

S. C.

(1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

47.

Love

Hagberg

Dellve

(2011). Balancing extensive ambition and a context overflowing with opportunities and demands: A grounded theory on stress and recovery among highly educated working young women entering male-dominated occupational areas. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 6(3). doi:10.3402/qhw.v6i3.5904

48.

Mungaray

K. R.

(2018). Re-imagining accounting leadership through a phronetic lens (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://web02.gonzaga.edu/comltheses/proquestftp/MUNGARAY_gonzaga_0736E_10590.pdf

49.

Naples

Gurr

(2014). Approaches to understanding the social world. In Hesse-Biber

(Ed.), Feminist research practice (pp. 14-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

50.

Nikulin

(2010). Dialectic and dialogue. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

51.

O’Neil

Hopkins

Bilimoria

(2015). A framework for developing women leaders: Applications to executive coaching. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51, 253-276. doi:10.1177/0021886315575550

52.

Planalp

(1993). Friends’ and acquaintances’ conversations II: Coded differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 339-354.

53.

Polyani

(1969). Knowing and being. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

54.

Psathas

(1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

55.

Rampe

Elliott

(2016). Gender equity in accounting: How the CPA profession is balancing the numbers. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 33(5), 6-18. doi:10.1002/joe.21694

56.

Rogers

L. E.

Farace

R. V.

(1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222-239.

57.

Sacks

(1984). Notes on methodology. In Atkinson

J. M.

Heritage

(Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21-27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

58.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

59.

Searle

J. R.

(1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

60.

Sheerin

(2015). The (she) wolf of Wall Street. Accounting, Finance & Governance Review, 22(2), 19-46.

61.

Thomas

(2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definitions, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 511-521.

62.

Tracy

(2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

63.

Walker

R. C.

Aritz

(2015). Women doing leadership: Leadership styles and organizational culture. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 452-478.

64.

Watzlawick

Bavelas

J. B.

Jackson

D. D.

(1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

65.

Weick

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

66.

Wenger

(1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

67.

Wooffitt

(2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.