This article explores discursive constructions of corporate volunteering (CV) across three countries. Based on the analysis of 29 qualitative interviews with employees working in small and medium size companies in Denmark, Slovenia, and the United States, we explore distinct discursive features of the embedded nature of CV in the broader context of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The findings reveal that different orientations to CSR inform and shape the ways participants working in the three countries construct CV as active, reactive, or proactive corporate practice. This study aids in understanding of the cross-cultural distinctiveness of discourses that pertain to CV from an employee perspective, while also challenging the common notion of CV as an aspect of strategic CSR.
AllenB. J. (2005). Social constructionism. In MayS.MumbyD. (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 35-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AshcraftK. A.KuhnT. R.CoorenF. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 1-64. doi:10.1080/19416520903047186
3.
BasilD.RunteM.BasilM.UsherJ. (2011). Company support for employee volunteerism: Does size matter?Journal of Business Research, 64, 61-66. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.002
4.
Baumann-PaulyD.WickertC.SpenceL. J.SchererA. G. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firm: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 693-705. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1827-7
5.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London, England: Penguin Books.
6.
BoothJ. E.ParkK. W.GlombT. M. (2009). Employer-supported volunteering benefits: Gift exchange among employers, employees, and volunteer organizations. Human Resource Management, 48, 227-249. doi:10.1002/hrm.20277
7.
BrudneyJ. L.GazleyB. (2006). Moving ahead or falling behind? Volunteer promotion and data collection. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16, 259-276. doi:10.1002/nml.106
8.
ChaudhriV. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the communication imperative: Perspective from CSR managers. International Journal of Business Communication, 53, 419-442.
9.
ChristensenL. T. (2007). The discourse of corporate social responsibility: Postmodern remarks. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 448-458). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
CoppaM.SrirameshK. (2013). Corporate social responsibility among SMEs in Italy. Public Relations Review, 39, 30-39. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.009
11.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CostasJ.KärremanD. (2013). Conscience as control—Managing employees through CSR. Organization, 20, 394-415. doi:10.1177/1350508413478584
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124-130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
15.
de GilderD.SchuytT. N. M.BreedijkM. (2005). Effects of an employee volunteering program on the work force: The ABN-AMRO case. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 143-152. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7101-x
16.
do PaçoA.NaveA. C. (2013). Corporate volunteering: A case study centered on the motivations, satisfaction and happiness of company employees. Employee Relations, 35, 547-559. doi:10.1108/ER-12-2012-0089
FaircloughN. (1989). Language and power. London, England: Longman.
20.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. L. (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 271-295). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
FairhurstG. T.Uhl-BienM. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1043-1062. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005
23.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
24.
GaneshS.McAllumK. (2012). Volunteering and professionalization: Trends in tension?Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 152-158. doi:10.1177/0893318911423762
25.
Gatignon-TurnauA.MignonacK. (2015). (Mis)using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers’ organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 68, 7-18. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.013
26.
GolobU. (2015). Whether and when: Corporate social responsibility as a nationally embraced concept in Slovenia. In IdowuS.SchmidpeterR.FifkaM. S. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe (pp. 351-364). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
27.
GrantA. (2012). Giving time, time after time: Work design and sustained employee participation in corporate volunteering. Academy of Management Review, 37, 589-615. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0280
28.
GrantD.KeenoyT.OswickC. (2001). Organizational discourse: Key contributions and challenges. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 5-24. doi:10.1080/00208825.2001.11656818
29.
GrantD.NybergD. (2011). The view from organizational studies: A discourse-based understanding of corporate social responsibility and communication. In IhlenØ.BarlettJ. F.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 534-549). Chichester, England: Wiley.
30.
HumphreysM.BrownA. D. (2008). An analysis of corporate social responsibility at Credit Line: A narrative approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 403-418. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9426-0
31.
JonesD. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857-878. doi:10.1348/096317909X477495
32.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MacPhailF.BowlesP. (2009). Corporate social responsibility as support for employee volunteers: Impacts, gender puzzles and policy implications in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 405-416. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9716-1
34.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
35.
MayS. (2011). Organizational communication and corporate social responsibility. In IhlenØ.BartlettJ. F.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 87-109). Chichester, England: Wiley.
36.
McAllumK. (2014). Meanings of organizational volunteering: Diverse volunteer pathways. Management Communication Quarterly, 28, 84-110. doi:10.1177/0893318913517237
37.
MorsingM. (2005). Denmark: Inclusive labour market strategies. In HabischA.WegnerM.R. SchmidpeterR.JonkerJ. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 23-35). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
38.
MuthuriJ. (2010). Volunteering. In VisserW.MattenD.PohlM.TolhurstN. (Eds.), The A to Z of corporate social responsibility: Revised and updated edition (p. 433). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
39.
MuthuriJ. N.MattenD.MoonJ. (2009). Employee volunteering and social capital: Contributions to corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Management, 20, 75-89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00551.x
40.
NaveA. C. do PaçoA. (2013). Corporate volunteering—An analysis of volunteers’ motivations and demographics. Journal of Global Responsibility, 4, 31-43. doi:10.1108/20412561311324050
41.
NielsenA. E.ThomsenC. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18, 83-93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01550.x
42.
PajoK.LeeL. (2011). Corporate-sponsored volunteering: A work design perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 467-482. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0665-0
43.
PastranaN. A.SrirameshK. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Perceptions and practices among SMEs in Colombia. Public Relations Review, 40, 14-24. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.10.002
44.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
PetersonD. K. (2004). Benefits of participation in corporate volunteer programs: Employees’ perceptions. Personnel Review, 33, 615-627. doi:10.1108/00483480410561510
46.
PhillipsN.HardyC. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social constructions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
PhillipsN.SewellG.JaynesS. (2008). Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 770-789. doi:10.1177/1094428107310837
48.
PlewaC.ConduitJ.QuesterP. G.JohnsonC. (2015). The impact of corporate volunteering on CSR image: A consumer perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 643-659. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2066-2
49.
RimH.FergusonM. A. T. (2017). Proactive versus reactive CSR in a crisis: An impression management perspective. International Journal of Business Communication. doi:10.1177/2329488417719835
50.
RodellJ.LynchJ. W. (2016). Perceptions of employee volunteering: Is it “credited” or “stigmatized” by colleagues?Academy of Management Journal, 59, 611-635. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0566
51.
Sanchez-HernandezM. I.Gallardo-VázquezD. (2013). Approaching corporate volunteering in Spain. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13, 397-411. doi:10.1108/CG-02-2012-0009
52.
SchoenebornD.TrittinH. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 193-211. doi:10.1108/13563281311319481
53.
SchultzF.CastellóI.MorsingM. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network society: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 681-692. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8
54.
SiltaojaM. (2009). On the discursive construction of a socially responsible organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 191-202. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2009.02.004
55.
SpenceL. J.Painter-MorlandM. (2011). Introduction: Global perspectives on ethics in small and medium sized enterprises. In SpenceL. J.Painter-MorlandM. (Eds.), Ethics in small and medium sized enterprises: A global commentary (pp. 1-9). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
56.
TracyK. (2001). Discourse analysis in communication. In SchiffrinD.TannenD.HamiltonH. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 725-749). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
57.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837-851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
58.
TracyS. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
59.
U.S. International Trade Commission. (2010, January). Small and medium-sized enterprises: Overview of participation in U.S. exports (USITC Publication No. 4125). Retrieved from https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4125.pdf
60.
VaaraE.KleymannB.SeristöH. (2004). Strategies as discursive constructions: The case of airline alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1-35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00419.x
61.
VaaraE.SorsaV.PälliP. (2010). On the force potential of strategy texts: A critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organization, 17, 685-702. doi:10.1177/1350508410367326
62.
WagnerT.LutzR. J.WeitzB. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77-91. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
