The global financial crisis that broke out in 2008 affected a large number of governmental, public, and private organizations. This article explores communication of public authorities in Sweden during the crisis, and highlights their discursive strategies between 2008 and 2010, analyzing press releases. As an analytical point of departure, complexity theory is combined with theory on strategic ambiguity in order to analyze which communication strategies were employed by the authorities. Results show that the public authorities embraced complexity and ambiguity differently in their communication, and consequences of their different approaches are discussed. The study also confirms that the different roles of significant actors during a crisis influence the selection of possible message strategies.
AshmosD. P.DuchonD.McDanielR. R. (2000). Organizational responses to complexity: The effect on organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 577-594. doi:10.1108/09534810010378597
2.
AulaP.SiiraK. (2007). Towards social complexity view on conflict, communication, and leadership. In HazyJ. K.GoldsteinJ. A.LichtensteinB. B. (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory: New perspectives from complexity science on social and organizational effectiveness (pp. 367-384). Mansfield, MA: ISCE.
3.
AulaP.SiiraK. (2010). Organizational communication and conflict management systems. Nordicom Review, 31, 125-141.
4.
BamberM.ParryS. (2016). A study of the employment of denial during a complex and unstable crisis involving multiple actors. International Journal of Business Communication, 53, 343-366. doi:10.1177/2329488414525454
5.
BenoitW. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23, 177-186.
6.
BenoitW. L.BrinsonS. L. (1999). Queen Elizabeth’s image repair discourse: Insensitive royal or compassionate queen?Public Relations Review, 25, 145-156. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80159-3
7.
CoombsW. T. (2015a). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CoombsW. T. (2015b). The value of communication during a crisis: Insights from strategic communication research. Business Horizons, 58, 141-148. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.10.003
9.
DulekR. E.CampbellK. S. (2015). On the dark side of strategic communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 122-142. doi:10.1177/2329488414560107
10.
EisenbergE. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
11.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. L. (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 271-295). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
GilpinD. (2008). Narrating the organizational self: Reframing the role of the news release. Public Relations Review, 34, 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.08.005
13.
GilpinD.MurphyP. (2006). Reframing crisis management through complexity. In BotanC.HazletonV. (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 375-392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
GilpinD.MurphyP. (2010). Implications of complexity theory for public relations. In HeathR. L. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of public relations (2nd ed., pp. 71-83). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Griffin-PadgettD. R.AllisonD. (2010). Making a case for restorative rhetoric: Mayor Rudolph Giuliani & Mayor Ray Nagin’s response to disaster. Communication Monographs, 77, 376-392. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.502536
16.
HuangY. H. (2008). Trust and relational commitment in corporate crises: The effects of crisis communicative strategy and form of crisis response. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 297-327. doi:10.1080/10627260801962830
17.
LeeB. K. (2004). Audience-oriented approach to crisis communication: A study of Hong Kong consumers’ evaluation of an organizational crisis. Communication Research, 31, 600-618. doi:10.1177/0093650204267936
18.
LehtimäkiH.KujalaJ.HeikkinenA. (2011). Corporate responsibility in communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 432-449. doi:10.1177/1080569911424203
19.
LeitchS.DavenportS. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on “sustainable” biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9, 43-61. doi:10.1177/1461445607072106
20.
LiuB. F. (2007). President Bush’s major post-Katrina speeches: Enhancing image repair discourse theory applied to the public sector. Public Relations Review, 33, 40-48. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.003
21.
MillerA. N.LittlefieldR. S. (2010). Product recalls and organizational learning: ConAgra’s responses to the peanut butter and pot pie crises. Public Relations Review, 36, 361-366. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.06.001
22.
NordL.OlssonE. K. (2013). Frame, set, match! Towards a model of successful crisis rhetoric. Public Relations Inquiry, 2, 79-94. doi: 10.1177/2046147X12464205
23.
SchultzF.RauppJ. (2010). The social construction of crises in governmental and corporate communications: An inter-organizational and inter-systemic analysis. Public Relations Review, 36, 112-119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.11.002
24.
SeegerM. W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: An expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 232-244. doi:10.1080/00909880600769944
25.
SeegerM. W.UlmerR. R. (2002). A post-crisis discourse of renewal: The cases of Malden Mills and Cole Hardwoods. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 126-142.
26.
SeegerM. W.UlmerR. R.NovakJ. M.SellnowT. (2005). Post-crisis discourse and organizational change, failure and renewal. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 78-95. doi:10.1108/09534810510579869
27.
SellnowT. L.SeegerM. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
28.
UlmerR. R.SellnowT. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the Box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 143-155.
29.
UlmerR. R.SellnowT.SeegerM. W. (2015). Effective crisis communication: moving from crisis to opportunity (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
