The use of accommodation strategies between native and nonnative interlocutors of English in the rapidly increased virtual and global work contexts remains underresearched. Contextualized in a Chinese IT outsourcing company where English is used as a lingua franca, this study focuses on how accommodation strategies are used by both on- and offshore team project members in their virtual meeting exchanges. The article argues that the actual linguistic exchange appears to be scaffolded and facilitated by a series of what the authors call “extratextual accommodation strategies” such as the use of detailed minutes of tasks set and completed, and an agreed meeting format. While “intratextual accommodation strategies,” that is, those relating to specific linguistic behaviors in English in the exchanges are also used by interlocutors to accommodate to each other’s speech; the article argues, therefore, that both extra- and intratextual accommodation strategies appear to work in a symbiotic way to ensure successful exchange in business virtual meeting contexts.
AngrosinoM. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London, England: Sage.
2.
Bargiela-ChiappiniF.NickersonC.PlankenB. (2007). Business discourse. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BilbowG. (1998). Look who’s talking: An analysis of “chair talk” in business meetings. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, 157-197.
4.
BuckG. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ChutnikM.GrzesikK. (2009). Leading a virtual intercultural team: Implications for virtual team leaders. Journal of Intercultural Management, 1(1), 82-90.
6.
ClennellC. (1995). Communication strategies of adult ESL learners: A discourse perspective. Prospect, 10(3), 4-20.
7.
CogoA.DeweyM. (2006). Efficiency in ELF communication: From pragmatic motives to lexico-grammatical innovation. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 5(2), 59-94.
8.
DaricsE. (2010). Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual meeting. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 129-150.
9.
DaricsE. (2015). Digital business discourse. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
Du-BabcockB. (2013). English as Business Lingua Franca: A comparative analysis of communication behavior and strategies in Asian and European contexts. Ibérica, 26, 99-130.
11.
FaerchC.KasperG. (1980). Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin–Utrecht, 5, 47-118.
12.
FaerchC.KasperG. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. In FaerchC.KasperG. (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20-60). London, England: Longman.
13.
FeakC. B. (2012). ESP and speaking. In PaltridgeB.StarfieldS. (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 35-53). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118339855
14.
FerrazziK. (2014). Getting virtual teams right. Harvard Business Review, 92(12), 120-123.
15.
FirthA. (1990). “Lingua franca” negotiations: Towards an interactional approach. World Englishes, 9, 69-80.
16.
FirthA. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On conversational analysis and “lingua franca” English. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 237-259.
17.
FriginalE. (2009). Threats to the sustainability of the outsourced call center industry in the Philippines: Implications for language policy. Language Policy, 8, 51-68.
18.
GalloisC.OgayT.GilesH. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In GudykunstW. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121-148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
GilesH. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87-109.
20.
GilesH.CouplandN.CouplandJ. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GilesH.PoweslandP. F. (1975). Speech styles and social evaluation. London, England: Academic Press.
22.
HenninkM.HutterI.BaileyA. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London, England: Sage.
23.
HertelG.GeisterS.KronradtU. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management, 15, 69-95.
24.
JanssensM.BrettJ. M. (2006). Cultural intelligence in global teams: A fusion model of collaboration. Group and Organization Management, 31, 124-153.
25.
KankaanrantaA. (2006). “Hej, Seppo. Could you pls comment on this?” International email communication in lingua franca English in a multinational company. Business Communication Quarterly, 69, 216-225.
26.
KankaanrantaA.PlankenB. (2010). BELF competence as business knowledge of internationally operating business professionals. International Journal of Business Communication, 47, 380-407.
27.
KayworthT.LeidnerD. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7-40.
28.
KlitmøllerA.LauringJ. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48, 398-406.
29.
KuritaT. (2012). Issues in second language listening comprehension and the pedagogical implications. Accents Asia, 5(1), 30-44.
30.
LiamputtongP. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
31.
LimC. G. (1997). Successful intercultural negotiations: A matter of attitude. Journal of Languages in Business, 8(1), 19-31.
32.
LockwoodJ. (2007). An interdisciplinary approach to teaching adults English in the workplace. In CumminsJ.DavisonC. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 15, pp. 403-412). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
LockwoodJ. (2013). International communication in a technology service call centre in India. World Englishes, 32, 536-550.
34.
LockwoodJ.ForeyG. (2010). Introduction. In ForeyG.LockwoodJ. (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace: Talking across the world (pp. 3-7). New York, NY: Continuum International.
35.
LockwoodJ.ForeyG. (2016). Discursive control and power in virtual meetings. Discourse & Communication, 10, 323-340.
36.
MeierkordC. (2002). Language stripped bare or linguistic masala? Culture in lingua franca conversation. In KnappK.MeierkordC. (Eds.), Lingua franca communication (pp. 109-133). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
37.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
NickersonC. (2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 367-380.
39.
OshriI.KotlarskyJ.WillcoksL. P. (2015). The handbook of global outsourcing and offshoring: The definitive guide to strategies and operations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
PadgettD. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
41.
PlankenB. (2005). Managing rapport in lingua franca sales negotiations: A comparison of professional and aspiring negotiators. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 381-400.
42.
PonciniG. (2003). Multicultural business meetings and the role of languages other than English. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 24, 17-32.
43.
PullinP. (2010). Small talk, rapport and international communicative competence. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 455-476.
44.
PullinP. (2013). Achieving “comity”: The role of linguistic stance in business English as a lingua franca (BELF) meetings. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2, 1-23.
45.
Rogerson-RevellP. (2010). “Can you spell that for us nonnative speakers?”Journal of Business Communication, 47, 432-454.
46.
SongY. (2015). The provision of English language training in IT outsourcing companies in China. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
47.
SongY. (2016). The provision of English language training in IT outsourcing companies in China. TESOLANZ Journal, 24(special ed.), 50-62.
48.
TaroneE. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 417-431.
49.
Ten HaveP. (2004). Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London, England: Sage.
50.
TingS.PhanG. Y. L. (2008). Adjusting communication strategies to language proficiency. Prospect: An Australian Journal of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), 23, 28-36.
51.
VandergriftL. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency?Modern Language Journal, 90, 6-18.
