Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Root cause analysis (RCA) is not always a straightforward process, and many human factors researchers struggle with executing RCA effectively and efficiently. For example, when conducting large, multi-site studies, the data points from participants quickly add up and begin to blur together. Then, during data analysis, notes that once made sense or are left unfinished now require additional time and effort to decode. This can require further video review or internal discussion to corroborate what happened and why, creating delays in analysis and reporting. This may lead to more questions which are now too late to answer. To combat this unfortunate reality, we discuss 5 best practices that can help researchers conduct more efficient RCAs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Branaghan

R. J.

Hildebrand

E. A.

Foster

L. B.

(2020). Designing for medical device safety. In Design for health (pp. 3-29). Academic Press

Food and Drug Administration. (2016). Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. www.fda.gov/media/80481/download.

Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Content of Human Factors Information in Medical Device Marketing Submissions: Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. https://www.fda.gov/media/163694/download.

Privitera

M. B.

(Ed.). (2019). Applied human factors in Medical Device design. Academic Press.

Wiklund

Dwyer

Davis

(2016). Medical device use error: Root cause analysis. CRC Press.

Back to Your “Roots”: 5 Best Practices for Performing Root Cause Analysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References