Identifying EHR Novice Users’ Cognitive Challenges: Mapping Critical Nursing Tasks Using HTA

Abstract

Rapid and widespread implementation of electronic health record (EHR) systems has been attributed to rising medical incidents in healthcare systems. Although previous research has evaluated and improved the usability of the EHR systems, there is limited understanding of EHR users’ cognitive challenges along the lifecycle of EHR data. Especially, nursing students, a novice user group, are considered amenable to reveal the user issues because of underdeveloped workarounds and automaticity. Therefore, this research aims to identify nursing students’ cognitive challenges and efforts regarding the use of the EHR system. As a first step of a multi-study research, the current study investigated cognitive work associated with five common critical nursing tasks that involve EHR usage. A Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) was conducted to build a hierarchical structure that represents critical functions and individual steps of each task, which will be used to explore potential areas that pose cognitive challenges to novice EHR users (i.e., nursing students). Preliminary findings are illustrated through HTA construction, which provides preliminary clues for possible cognitive errors. Additional studies are planned to triangulate HTA findings. Results from combined studies will provide a comprehensive examination of problem areas that require greater cognitive effort from novice users.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambinder

E.P.

(2005). Electronic Health Records. Journal of Oncology Practice, 1(2), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2005.1.2.57

Brady

T.F.

Störmer

V.S.

Alvarez

G.A.

(2016). Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(27), 7459-7464. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520027113.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2021, December 1). Electronic Health Records. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/E-Health/EHealthRecords

Clarke

M.A.

Belden

J.L.

Kim

M.S.

(2014). Determining differences in user performance between expert and novice primary care doctors when using an electronic health record (EHR). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 20, 1153-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12277.

Cresswell

K.M.

Worth

Sheikh

(2012). Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(1), 1–12.

Ellsworth

M.A.

Dziadzko

O’Horo

J.C.

Farrell

A.M.

Zhang

Herasevich

(2016). An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(1), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw046.

Embi

P.J.

Weir

Efthimiadis

E.N.

Thielke

S.M.

Hedeen

A.N.

Hammond

K.W.

(2013). Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(4), 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000946.

Glaser

(2020, June 12). It’s time for a new kind of electronic health record. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/06/its-time-for-a-new-kind-of-electronic-health-record

Kossman

S.P.

Scheidenhelm

S.L.

(2008). Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Computers Informatics Nursing, 26(2), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCN.0000304775.40531.67.

10.

Kruse

C.S.

Kristof

Jones

Mitchell

Martinez

(2016). Barriers to electronic health record adoption: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(12), 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9.

11.

Luck

S.J.

Vogel

E.K.

(1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846

12.

Mance

Vogel

E.K.

(2013). Visual working memory. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1219.

13.

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (2017). Non-federal acute care hospital electronic health record adoption. HealthIT.gov. https://www.healthit.gov/data/quickstats/non-federal-acute-care-hospital-electronic-health-record-adoption

14.

Pfaff

M.S.

Eris

Weir

Anganes

Crotty

Rahman

Ward

Nebeker

J.R.

(2021). Analysis of the cognitive demands of electronic health record use. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 113, e103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103633.

15.

Phipps

D.L.

Meakin

G.H.

Beatty

P.C.W.

(2011). Extending hierarchical task analysis to identify cognitive demands and information design requirements. Applied Ergonomics, 42(5), 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.11.009.

16.

Rahul

Banyal

R.K.

(2020). Data life cycle management in big data analytics. Procedia Computer Science, 173, 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.042.

17.

Rosenbaum

(2011). The patient protection and affordable care act: Implications for the public health policy and practice. Public Health Records, 126(1), 130-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491112600118

18.

Stanton

N.A.

(2006). Hierarchical task analysis: Developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 55-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003.

19.

Stombierski

(2021, February 2). 8 steps in the data life cycle. Harvard Business School Online. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/data-life-cycle

20.

Tapuria

Porat

Kalra

Dsouza

Xiahui

Curcin

(2021). Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: Systematic review. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 46(2), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810.

21.

Weir

C.R.

Hammond

K.W.

Embi

P.J.

Efthimiadis

E.N.

Thielke

S.M.

Hedeen

A.N.

(2011). An exploration of the impact of computerized patient documentation on clinical collaboration. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(8), 62–71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.003.