Investigating the Key Persuasive Features for Fitness App Design and Extending the Persuasive System Design Model: A Qualitative Approach

Abstract

Physical inactivity has been recognized as one of the leading risk factors that account for many non-communicable diseases, with the World Health Organization labeling it as the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality. This has led researchers and developers to create fitness apps to support and motivate people to engage in physical activity more regularly. However, there is limited research on how collectivist and individualist users from different social and cultural backgrounds differ in terms of the persuasive features they care about in fitness apps. Having knowledge of the cultural differences will help designers and developers create better fitness apps tailored to the two main types of culture. Hence, we conducted an empirical study to uncover how both cultures differ and the possibility of extending the Persuasive System Design (PSD) model. We found that Primary Task Support (Self-Monitoring and Goal-Setting) is requested more by the individualist group than the collectivist group. On the other hand, Dialog Support (Reminder and Suggestion) is requested more by the collectivist group than the individualist group. Finally, we found that the PSD model can be extended with Goal-Setting and Verbal Persuasion for fitness app design.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Orji

Lomotey

Oyibo

, et al (2018) Tracking feels oppressive and ‘punishy’: Exploring the costs and benefits of self-monitoring for health and wellness. Digital Health 4:205520761879755. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618797554

Conroy

Yang

Maher

(2014) Behavior Change Techniques in Top-Ranked Mobile Apps for Physical Activity. Am J Prev Med 46:649–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.010

Oyibo

Vassileva

(2019) Investigation of the moderating effect of culture on users’ susceptibility to persuasive features in fitness applications. Information (Switzerland) 10:. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10110344

Oinas-Kukkonen

Harjumaa

(2009) Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24:485–500. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02428

Hofstede

(1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede

(2001) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Journal of International Business Studies 23:362–365.

Oinas-Kukkonen

Harjumaa

(2009) Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24:485–500.

Lee

Choi

Kim

, et al (2008) Cultural dimensions for user experience: Cross-country and cross-product analysis of users’ cultural characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, BCS HCI 2008. pp 3–12.

Ford

Gelderblom

(2003) The Effects of Culture on Performance Achieved through the use of Human Computer Interaction. SAICSIT ’03 Proceedings of the 2003 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology 218–230.

10.

Cyr

Head

Ivanov

(2009) Perceptions of Mobile Device Website Design: Culture, Gender and Age Comparisons. 173–200.

11.

Khaled

(2008) Culturally-Relevant Persuasive Technology. Victorian University of Wellington

12.

Kyriakoullis

Zaphiris

(2015) Culture and HCI: a review of recent cultural studies in HCI and social networks. Universal Access in the Information. Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0445-9

13.

Khaled

Biddle

Noble

, et al (2006) Persuasive Interaction for Collectivist Cultures. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series 50:63–70.

14.

Reinecke

Bernstein

(2013) Knowing What a User Likes: A Design Science Approach to Interfaces that Adapt to Culture. MIS Quarterly 37:427–453.

15.

Oyibo

Adaji

Orji

, et al (2018) Perceived Persuasive Effect of Behavior Model Design in Fitness Apps. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Singagpore, pp 219–228.

16.

Buhrmester

Kwang

Gosling

(2011) Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980

17.

Oyibo

(2020) Designing culture-tailored persuasive technology to promote physical activity. University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

18.

Bandura

(1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W H. Freeman.