An extended version of the Rasmussen’s Dynamic Safety Model was implemented to empirically index team activity during a medical emergency. The video recordings of two emergency training sessions during the simulation of an adverse event with two paramedical teams were analyzed with a coding scheme based on the model. We show that individual’s allocation of perceptions and actions to multiple work constraints (i.e., patient’s state monitoring, information processing with team, and equipment management) can be dynamically tracked.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmalbertiR.VincentC.AuroyY.de Saint MauriceG. (2006). Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15, 66-71.
CookR.RasmussenJ. (2005). “Going solid”: a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 130-134.
4.
CookeN. J.GormanJ. C. (2006). Assessment of team cognition. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 270-275.
5.
FlachJ. M. (2012). Complexity: learning to muddle through. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 187-197.
6.
FlachJVoorhorstF. (2016). What Matters: Putting Common Sense to Work. Dayton: Wright State University Library
7.
FlinR.MaranN. (2004). Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13, 80-84.
8.
GibsonJ. J.CrooksL. E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving. The American Journal of Psychology, 51, 453-471.
9.
GormanJ. C.CookeN. J.KiekelP. A. (2004). Dynamical perspectives on team cognition. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 673-677). SAGE Publications.
10.
HallT. J.RudolphJ. W.CaoC. G. (2006). Fixation and attention allocation in anesthesiology crisis management: an abstraction hierarchy perspective. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 1064-1067). SAGE Publication.
11.
McKayA.WalkerS. T.BrettS. J.VincentC.SevdalisN. (2012). Team performance in resuscitation teams: comparison and critique of two recently developed scoring tools. Resuscitation, 83, 1478-1483.
12.
MorineauT.ChapelainP.QuinioP. (2016). Task management skills and their deficiencies during care delivery in simulated medical emergency situation: A classification. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 34, 42–50.
13.
MorineauT.ChapelainP.Le CourtoisM.Le GacJ.M. (in press). Fields of promoted actions for facilitating multitasking activity during a medical emergency. Bristish Medical Journal: Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.
14.
PatelV. L.CohenT. (2008). New perspectives on error in critical care. Current opinion in critical care, 14, 456-459.
15.
RabyM.WickensC. D. (1994). Strategic workload management and decision biases in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 211-240.
16.
RasmussenJ. (1994). Risk management, adaptation, and design for safety. In BrehmerB.SahlinN.-E. (Eds). Future risks and risk management (pp. 1-36). Netherlands: Springer.
17.
RasmussenJ. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science, 27, 183-213.
18.
ReaderT.FlinR.LaucheK.CuthbertsonB. H. (2006). Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. British journal of anaesthesia, 96, 551-559.
19.
SalvucciD.D. (2013). Attention. In LeeJ.D.KirlikA. (Eds). The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering. (pp. 57-67). NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
WickensC.D. (2013). Attention. In LeeJ.D.KirlikA. (Eds). The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering. (pp 36-56). NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
WickensC. D.AlexanderA. L. (2009). Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19, 182-199.
