This paper reviews current human-automation trust and trust repair literature as it applies to health-care systems. In addition, we examine the increased use and relevance of social agents, such as robots and virtual agents, within the medical field and consider the importance of using social agents in this particular domain. Furthermore, we examine strategies for trust repair following errors in health-care settings, and provide a conceptual framework for repairing trust with social automation. Most literature to date stems from a human-human perspective, and we hope to extend this work to the field of social automation. If these strategies are effective, humanautomation systems in health-care can maintain appropriate levels of trust, ensuring effective and efficient long-term collaborations in critical work areas.
AckermanE. (2014b, Oct 29). OSHbot will save you from having to ask for help in a hardware store. IEEE Spectrum.
3.
AlberdiE., PovyakaloA. A., StriginiL., AytonP., & Given- WilsonR. (2008). CAD in mammography: Lesion-level versus case-level analysis of the effects of prompts on human decisions. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 3, 115–122.
de VisserE. J. (2012). The World is Not Enough: Trust in Cognitive Agents (Doctoral dissertation). George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
6.
de VisserE. J., KruegerF., McKnightP., ScheidS., SmithM., ChalkS., & ParasuramanR. (2012). The World is not Enough: Trust in Cognitive Agents. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 263–267.
7.
de VisserE. J., ShawT., RoviraE., & ParasuramanR. (2009). Could you be a little nicer? Pushing the right buttons with automation etiquette. In Proceedings of the 17th International Ergonomics Association Meeting. Beijing, China.
8.
de VisserE. J., & ParasuramanR. (2011). Adaptive aiding of human-robot teaming: Effects of imperfect automation on performance, trust, and workload. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 5(2), 209–231.
GuizzoE., & AckermanE. (2012, September 18). How Rethink Robotics build its new Baxter robot worker. IEEE Spectrum.
11.
HayesC., & MillerC. A. (2011). Human-Computer Etiquette: Cultural Expectations and the Design Implications They Place on Computers and Technology (p. 406). [KM4] Auerbach Publications.
KimP. H., CooperC. D., DirksK. T., & FerrinD. L. (2013). Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 1–14.
14.
KohnL. T., CorriganJ. M., & DonaldsonM. S. (Eds.) (2000). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15.
ParasuramanR., & MillerC. A. (2004). Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47(4) 51–55.
16.
ParasuramanR., & RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230–253.
17.
ReasonJ. (1990). Human error.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WadaK., & ShibataT. (2006). Robot therapy in a care house- its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3966-3971.
24.
World Health Organization. (2014). Unprecedented number of medical staff infected with Ebola [Press release].
