There has been a significant amount of research looking at the issue of displaying statistical data to the general public. Much of this work has been in the area of presenting risk data. Despite a significant amount of research, many organizations still fail to utilize this research when presenting this information in web-based tools and applications. This paper reviews a specific effort to apply this research knowledge to the design of a specific tool for displaying risk data to the general public.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AklEAOxmanADHerrinJ. (2011). Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(3):CD006776.
2.
BrasseG.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1998). Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: the role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 127(1):3–21.
3.
EdwardsAElwynGGwynR. General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study. BMJSep18;319(7212):749-752 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10488001]
4.
FagerlinAUbelP.A.SmithD.M.Zikmund-FisherBJ. (2007). Making numbers matter: present and future research in risk communication. Am J Health Behavior; 31(Suppl 1):S47-S56. [Medline: 17931136]
5.
ForrowL.TaylorW.C.ArnoldR.M. (1992). Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med, Feb; 92(2):121-124. [Medline: 1543193] [doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90100-P]
6.
Garcia-RetameroR.gale sicM.GigerenzerG. (2010). Do Icon Arrays Help Reduce Denominator Neglect?Medical Decision Making. 30:672-684.
7.
HanP. K.LehmanT. C.MassettH.FreemanA. N. (2011). Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors. Medical Decision Making. 31(2):354-366.
8.
HanP.K.KleinW.M.KillamB.LehmanT.MassettH.FreedmanAN.Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: Effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about risk. Patient Education and Counseling. Mar32011.
9.
HanP. K.MoserR. P.KleinW. M. (2006). Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. Journal of Health Communication, 11 (Suppl. 1), 51-69.
10.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143-157.
11.
LipkusI.M. (2007). Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making. 27(5):696–713.
12.
LipkusI.M. (2007). Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making. Sep-Oct2007; 27(5):696-713.
13.
LipkusI.M.HollandsJ.G. (1999). The visual communication of risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph. (25):149–163.
14.
McCafferyK. J.DixonA.HayenA.JansenJ.SmithS.SimpsonJ. M. (2012). The Influence of Graphic Display Format on the Interpretations of Quantitative Risk Information among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy: A Randomized Experimental Study. Medical Decision Making. 27(32):532-544.
15.
TrevenaLZikmund-FisherBEdwardsAGaissmaierWGalesicMHanPKingJLawsonMLinderSLipkusIOzanneEPetersETimmermansDWoloshinS. 2012. Presenting Probabilities. In VolkRLlewellyn-ThomasH (eds). Update of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration’s Background Document. Chapter C. http://ipdas.ohri.ca/resources.html
16.
VisschersV.H.MeertensR.M.PasschierW.W.de VriesN.N. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature. Risk Anal. Feb; 29(2):267-287.
17.
WatersE. A.SullivanH. W.NelsonW.HesseB.W. (2009). What is my cancer risk? How internet-based cancer risk assessment tools communicate individualized risk estimates to the public: Content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(3), e33.
18.
WatersE.AWeinsteinN.D.ColditzG.A.EmmonsK. (2006) Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions. J Health Communications. Mar;11(2):167-182.[Medline: 16537286] [doi: 10.1080/10810730500526695].
19.
WillsCEHolmes-RovnerM. (2003). Patient comprehension of information for shared treatment decision making: state of the art and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. Jul;50(3):285-290. [Medline: 12900101] [doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00051-X]
20.
WittemanH. O.Zikmund-FisherB. J.WatersE. A.GavaruzziT.FagerlinA. (2011). Risk Estimates From an Online Risk Calculator Are More Believable and Recalled Better When Expressed as Integers. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 13(3):e54
21.
YamagishiK. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality risk is more dangerous than a 24.14%: implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 11(6):495–506.
22.
Zickerman -FisherB. J.FagerlinA.UbelP. A. (2010). Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics. Cancer. 113(12):3382-90.
