For over half of its lifespan, the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) operated without any dedicated continuous institutional support. This shortcoming was finally remedied at the Sixth Review Conference in 2006, not long after the convention’s 30th anniversary. The Implementation Support Unit (ISU) created by that Review Conference has now been in existence for almost 2 decades. This year also marks the 50th anniversary of the convention—an appropriate moment to make some observations on the contribution of the ISU to the overall development of the BWC. In this commentary, we examine the efforts made over the years to equip the BWC with stronger institutional support and provide a description of the establishment of the ISU in 2006. We also summarize some key achievements of the ISU alongside some of the challenges that it has faced. Finally, we conclude with reference to the ongoing discussions within the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Convention to endow it with a more robust institution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FlowerreeCC. On tending arms control agreements. Washington Q. 1990:13(1)199-215.
Fourth Review Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Final document. Published 1996. Accessed September 8, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.IV/9
9.
LittlewoodJ. The Biological Weapons Convention. In: FaureGO, ed. Unfinished Business: Why International Negotiations Fail. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2012.
10.
SimsNA. The Evolution of Biological Disarmament. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
11.
Fifth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Final document. Published 2002. Accessed September 8, 2025. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/480805?ln
12.
Fifth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Estimated costs of meetings in 2003, 2004 and 2005 of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Published November 13, 2025. Accessed September 8, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.V/14
13.
Meeting of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Estimated costs of meetings in 2003, 2004 and 2005 of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Report of the Meeting of States Parties, Volume I. Published November 26, 2003. Accessed September 8, 2025. https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/bwc/bwc/pdfs/report_2003.pdf
Third Meeting of the States Parties to the Convention of the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction. Final report. Published January 10, 2002. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/APLC/MSP.3/2001/1
17.
Sixth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Implementation of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC): need for a concerted and coordinated approach, submitted by the Netherlands on behalf of the European Union. Published October 20, 2006. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.VI/WP.7
18.
Sixth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Support unit, submitted by Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. Published October 20, 2006. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.VI/WP.13
19.
Sixth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Support Unit for the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, submitted by Japan, Australia, Canada, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, Norway and New Zealand (JACKSNNZ). Published November 15, 2006. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.VI/WP.16
20.
Sixth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Final document. Published 2006. Accessed September 9, 2005. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.VI/6
21.
KhanM. The 2006 BWC Review Conference: the president’s reflections. Disarmament Diplomacy. 2007; 84.
22.
Seventh Review Conference on the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Final document of the Seventh Review Committee. Published January 13, 2012. Accessed September 9, 2005. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.vii/7
23.
Meeting of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Annual Report of the Implementation Support Unit, submitted by the Implementation Support Unit. Published December 3, 2024. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/msp/2024/4
24.
OrdT. The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. New York: Grand Central Publishing; 2020.
25.
Meeting of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Report of the 2018 Meeting of States Parties. Published December 11, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/MSP/2018/6
26.
Ninth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Final Document of the Ninth Review Conference. Published December 22, 2022. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/CONF.IX/9
27.
Working Group on the Strengthening of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Updated concept paper on an International Agency for Biological Security (IABS), submitted by Kazakhstan. Published November 28, 2024. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/WG/5/WP.4
28.
Working Group on the Strengthening of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Possible elements of a draft statute of an international agency for biological security: revised working paper submitted by Kazakhstan taking into account comments made during the previous sessions of the Working Group on the Strengthening of the Convention. Published November 28, 2024. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/WG/5/WP.5
29.
Working Group on the Strengthening of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Possible structure/functions of a BWC implementation organization, submitted by the United States of America, co-sponsored by Australia, Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, North Macedonia, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Published December 11, 2024. Accessed September 9, 2025. https://docs.un.org/en/BWC/WG/5/WP.1/Rev.1
