Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a commonly employed surgical approach for recurrent patellar dislocation. However, the impact of elevated body mass index (BMI) on postoperative complication rates remains controversial.

Purpose:

To compare the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of patients with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m²) and those with elevated BMI (≥25 kg/m²) who underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent acquired lateral traumatic patellar dislocation.

Study Design:

Cohort Study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 70 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation were included in this study. Patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were categorized into 2 groups based on their BMI: the normal BMI group and the elevated BMI group. Functional scores (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner, and Kujala scores) and radiological measurements (patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral trochlear congruence, lateral patellofemoral angle, and lateral patellar displacement) were evaluated both preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The occurrence of postoperative complications at the last follow-up was also recorded. Differences in functional scores and radiological parameters before and after surgery were analyzed with paired-samples t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups were conducted using independent-samples t tests or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

Results:

In the normal BMI group, there were 13 male patients and 27 female patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 26.15 ± 13.16 months. The mean age in this group was 21.93 ± 7.94 years. The elevated BMI group consisted of 12 male patients and 18 female patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 27.50 ± 15.79 months and a mean age of 23.30 ± 8.43 years. At the final follow-up, the incidence of surgical failure (patellar redislocation or subluxation and necessitating secondary surgery) was significantly higher in the elevated BMI group (6 out of 30 patients; 20.0%) compared with the normal BMI group (1 out of 40 patients; 2.5%) (P < .05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner, and Kujala scores compared with the preoperative period (P < .05). Notably, the normal BMI group had significantly higher preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores compared with the elevated BMI group (P < .05). Furthermore, the elevated BMI group exhibited less improvement in Tegner and Kujala scores compared with the normal BMI group (P < .05). Postoperative radiological parameters in both groups returned to the normal range (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of radiological parameters and their corresponding differences.

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrated statistically significant increases in postoperative clinical scores for both groups, although the intergroup differences varied. Specifically, patients with elevated BMI demonstrated poorer preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. The postoperative improvement in radiological parameters was equally good between the 2 groups.

Keywords

knee ligament patella BMI complication medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction patellar dislocation

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary stabilizer restraining lateral displacement of the patella and is injured in up to 94% of traumatic lateral patellar dislocations.²¹ As a result, MPFL reconstruction continues to be the most preferred approach despite the emergence of various surgical techniques for managing patellar dislocations in recent years.^9,26 In addition, MPFL reconstruction can be supplemented by several bony procedures that can address anatomic abnormalities. For example, trochleoplasty handles severe trochlear dysplasia,¹⁹ and tibial tuberosity transfer handles excessive tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance.¹

Patients with elevated body mass index (BMI) will be exposed to a greater load on injured cartilage, leading to worse pain after acute patellar dislocation.² Moreover, Milinkovic et al¹⁸ have proven that elevated BMI predicts poor disease-specific quality of life after lateral patellar instability. One study reported that elevated BMI was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes after MPFL reconstruction alone or with bony surgery.³⁰ However, Sherman et al²⁵ demonstrated significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and a lower complication rate in obese patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. These studies present conflicting findings on the topic.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of BMI on clinical outcomes after MPFL reconstruction by comparing functional outcomes, complication rates, and radiographic outcomes in patients with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m²) and elevated BMI (≥25 kg/m²) undergoing MPFL reconstruction. We hypothesized that patients with elevated BMI would have poorer functional scores, higher complication rates, and equivalent radiographic outcomes compared with those with normal BMI after MPFL reconstruction.

Methods

This study was designed as a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction between July 2017 and March 2022. It was approved by the local ethics committee (Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No. 2022A-224). The patient’s height and weight were measured at the initial visit using stadiometers and calibrated scales. BMI was calculated by a standard equation (BMI = weight/height², kg/m²). We classified the included patients as normal BMI group (18.5-24.9 kg/m²) and elevated BMI group (≥25 kg/m²) by BMI according to the World Health Organization categorizations.²⁰

Patients were included if they met 1 of the following criteria: (1) exhibited patellar lateral overhang as demonstrated on computed tomography (CT); (2) underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation of traumatic onset (≥2 patellar dislocations); (3) required surgery for acute patellar dislocation, after failure of ≥6 months of conservative treatment; (4) completed follow-up for ≥12 months; and (5) performed pre- and postoperative CT examinations. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) MPFL reconstruction combined with bony surgery (eg, tibial tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty, varization, or torsional osteotomy); (2) other previous osteotomy or ligamentous reconstruction procedures at the knee joint (eg, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction); (3) systemic ligament relaxation and myasthenia gravis ruled out upon assessment of directional range of motion and related muscle strength to observe joint hypermobility, as well as comparison with the contralateral side; (4) not willing to participate in this study; and (5) lost to follow-up during the monitoring period. All MPFL reconstructions were performed by the 2 senior co-authors, both of whom have ≥20 years of experience in knee procedures (X.S. and J.J.).

Surgical Intervention and Postoperative Protocol

Under subarachnoid anesthesia, the patient was placed in the supine position with lateral support. A tourniquet was used to reduce intraoperative bleeding during the operation. Initially, under arthroscopy, the intra-articular damage was assessed, followed by the removal of intra-articular hematomas and fracture fragments. Subsequently, the semitendinosus was retrieved for MPFL reconstruction.

Patellar Fixation

A longitudinal incision of approximately 4 cm was made along the medial margin of the patella to expose the patella and the proximal half of its bone surface. The double semicurve tunnel locator was utilized to guide the insertion of a 2-mm Kirschner wire at the junction of the proximal one-third of the medial edge of the patella, ensuring the protection of the patellar cartilage. Another Kirschner wire was inserted in the same manner at the midpoint of the medial edge of the patella. Subsequently, the drill was used to create tunnels along the 2 Kirschner wires, with the drilling width matching that of the graft. The distal ends of the 2 tunnels extended to half the diameter of the patella. The third and fourth tunnels were created in a similar manner, running in a front-to-back direction and connecting vertically to the first and second tunnels (Figure 1). The semitendinosus tendon was then passed through the 2 tunnels sequentially, starting from the inner edge of the patella, and the 2 free ends were sutured together laterally, forming a double-bundle tendon autograft.

Figure 1.

The drawing depicts the creation of the double semicurve tunnel by drilling from the proximal one-third and midpoint of the medial edge of the patella.

Femoral Fixation

A 2 cm–long longitudinal incision was made on the medial epicondyle of the femur to expose the femoral attachment site of the MPFL, located between the adductor tubercle and the medial epicondyle. With the aid of a fluoroscopic C-arm, a Kirschner wire with a diameter of 2 mm was inserted from the crest of the adductor tubercle and the medial epicondyle to the outside of the femur. The femoral fixation point was situated approximately 1.3 mm anterior to the posterior cortical line of the femur and 2.5 mm distal to the starting point of the femoral medial condyle, known as the Schöttle point.²³ This positioning was crucial for maintaining the isometric nature of the reconstructed ligament, ensuring optimal isometry of the femoral lateral ligament. A 7 mm–diameter drill was used to create a tunnel along the Kirschner wire, and the distal end of drill reached the lateral femoral cortex. The suture end of the graft was passed through the hole of the femoral tunnel to assist the graft in passing through the tunnel. The appropriate tension was applied to the graft at 30° of knee flexion, and femoral fixation was performed after ensuring that the patella smoothly entered the femoral trochlea. After reconfirmation of normal patellar tracking during knee flexion, it was fixed with a bioabsorbable interference screw (Arthrex) (Figure 1). Finally, the patellar tracking was reconfirmed under knee arthroscopy.

Rehabilitation Protocol

All patients followed similar rehabilitation training protocols. The affected limb was treated with ice compress and pressure bandage immediately after the operation. An adjustable knee joint brace was initiated at this time to keep the affected limb in full extension, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were taken to relieve pain. On the first day after recovering from anesthesia, the affected limb underwent quadriceps femoris contraction training, and the patella was gently pushed inward at regular intervals as needed to prevent soft tissue adhesion. For 2 weeks, the patient was allowed to stand with the use of a crutch to keep the braced knee straight.. Achievement of 90° of knee flexion by 4 weeks postoperatively and full range of motion by 8 weeks postoperatively were required to ensure optimal recovery and functional outcomes. `Full range of motion’ refers to the ability to flex and extend the knee through its complete natural range without restriction. All patients wore the knee brace to the 3-month postoperative time point for ongoing protection while the affected limb regained normal motion. Sports activities were gradually carried out at 6 months postoperatively.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation

Demographic data (age, sex, side, and follow-up time), medical history (osteochondral fractures, time to surgery, and length of stay), subjective functional outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner, and Kujala scores), and radiographic parameters were collected preoperatively. Patellar tilt angle (≥20° was considered abnormal),⁶ patellofemoral trochlear congruence (>16° was found to be abnormal),¹⁷ lateral patellofemoral angle (inward opening or parallel to the 2 lines was considered abnormal),¹³ and lateral patellar displacement (more than half the width of the patella was considered abnormal)¹¹ were measured in the transverse plane on CT. On the postoperative CT, the measurement of patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral trochlear congruence, lateral patellofemoral angle, and lateral patellar displacement was repeated. Radiological parameters were measured by 3 authors (Q.W., J.Z. and Z.W.), and the final analysis was based on the mean values. In addition, at the last follow-up, postoperative objective functional outcomes were re-evaluated and the occurrence of complications (eg, surgical failure, anterior knee pain, wound infection, and wound scar) was recorded. Surgical failure was defined as patellar redislocation or subluxation and necessitated secondary patellar stabilization surgery.¹⁶

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 26.0 (IBM). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check the normal distribution of the data before performing the descriptive statistical analysis. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations when their distributions conformed with normal distributions and as medians with interquartile ranges otherwise. The dichotomous variables were described as frequencies with percentages. Preoperative and postoperative differences in functional scores and radiological parameters were tested using paired-samples t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Functional scores and radiological parameters were compared between groups using 2 independent-samples t tests or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used for intergroup comparisons of dichotomous variables. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all analyses.

Results

A total of 70 patients (70 knees) were included for analysis. The demographic results, medical history, and radiological parameters were summarized and are presented in Table 1. The overall mean follow-up time for patients was 26.72 ± 14.24 months. The percentage and mean age of female patients were 64.3% and 22.51 ± 8.12 years, respectively. There were 40 participants in the normal BMI group and 30 in the elevated BMI group. Patients with concomitant osteochondral fractures accounted for 32.5% in the normal BMI group and 26.7% in the elevated BMI group, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. In terms of the mechanisms of injury, we categorized them as falling from a height, motor vehicle crash, sprain during exercise, and other. Other included instances such as slipping, standing up after prolonged sitting, and walking without a clear precipitating cause. Chondroplasty was employed as a therapeutic approach for addressing osteochondral fractures, with the removal of fragments deemed necessary in instances where osteochondral fracture fragments had become dislodged, forming loose bodies.

Table 1

Demographic Results, Medical History, and Surgical Information

Variable	Normal BMI Group (n = 40)	Elevated BMI Group (n = 30)	P
Age, y	21.93 ± 7.94	23.30 ± 8.43	.487
Sex, n			.517
Male	13	12
Female	27	18
Side, n			.061
Right	22	23
Left	18	7
Follow-up time, mo	26.15 ± 13.16	27.50 ± 15.79	.698
Height, m	1.66 ± 0.07	1.67 ± 0.11	.536
Weight, kg	58.91 ± 6.31	79.50 ± 13.05	<.001
BMI, kg/m²	21.49 ± 1.73	28.36 ± 2.16	<.001
Length of stay, d	8.85 ± 2.98	9.83 ± 3.57	.214
Osteochondral fractures, n (%)	13 (32.5)	8 (26.7)	.598
Time to surgery, mo, median (IQR)	6 (1-21)	9.5 (1-48)	.555
Mechanism of injury, n			.807
Falling from a height	9	7
Motor vehicle crash	3	3
Sprain during exercise	19	11
Other	9	9
Removal of fracture fragments, n (%)	11 (27.5)	8 (26.7)	.938

Data presented as mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated. BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range.

Functional Scores

The results of the clinical scores (Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner, and Kujala scores) for normal BMI and elevated BMI groups are presented in Table 2. The scores in both groups exhibited a statistically significant increase at the last follow-up compared with preoperatively (P < .05). Notably, for preoperative functional scores, the normal BMI group had significantly greater Lysholm scores and Tegner scores compared with the elevated BMI group (P < .05). Additionally, the normal BMI group did statistically just as well in terms of improvement in Lysholm and IKDC scores as the elevated BMI group, while showing significantly greater improvement in Tegner and Kujala scores (P < .05).

Table 2

Comparison of the Functional Scores^a

Score	Preoperative	Last Follow-up	P	Difference (△)
Lysholm score
Normal BMI group	62.72 ± 17.67	89.88 ± 11.06	<.001	27.15 ± 16.46
Elevated BMI group	52.47 ± 18.70	79.83 ± 16.77	<.001	27.37 ± 18.95
	P = .022	P = .006		P = .959
IKDC score
Normal BMI group	52.68 ± 16.60	85.93 ± 7.16	<.001	33.25 ± 16.37
Elevated BMI group	44.97 ± 17.89	73.30 ± 12.67	<.001	28.33 ± 17.73
	P = .067	P < .001		P = .234
Tegner score
Normal BMI group	2 (1-3)	6 (4-7)	<.001	4 (2-5)
Elevated BMI group	1 (1-1)	3 (2-4)	<.001	2 (1-3)
	P = .003	P < .001		P = .002
Kujula score
Normal BMI group	51.33 ± 16.57	93.40 ± 6.46	<.001	42.08 ± 17.19
Elevated BMI group	54.13 ± 13.02	82.20 ± 15.68	<.001	28.07 ± 15.95
	P = .446	P = .001		P = .001

Data presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee.

Radiographic Parameters

The results of the radiological parameters (patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral trochlear congruence, lateral patellofemoral angle, and lateral patellar displacement) in both groups are presented in Table 3. At the final follow-up, the patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral trochlear congruence, lateral patellofemoral angle, and lateral patellar displacement returned to normal values in both groups, with a statistically significant improvement compared with the preoperative period (P < .05). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in radiological parameters.

Table 3

Comparison of Radiographic Parameters^a

Radiographic Parameter	Preoperative	Last Follow-up	P	Difference (△)
Patellar tilt angle, deg
Normal BMI group	27.75 ± 6.03	15.77 ± 7.73	<.001	11.88 ± 7.92
Elevated BMI group	27.18 ± 6.02	17.86 ± 9.44	<.001	9.32 ± 9.83
	P = .712	P = .336		P = .280
Patellofemoral trochlear congruence, deg
Normal BMI group	36.51 ± 15.09	16.22 ± 13.66	<.001	20.14 ± 20.43
Elevated BMI group	33.46 ± 11.43	14.28 ± 11.48	<.001	19.17 ± 12.46
	P = .389	P = .560		P = .814
Lateral patellofemoral angle, deg
Normal BMI group	−5.13 ± 19.87	3.19 ± 7.89	<.001	7.71 ± 16.83
Elevated BMI group	−8.24 ± 12.78	4.70 ± 7.85	<.001	12.94 ± 11.19
	P = .488	P = .457		P = .176
Lateral patellar displacement, mm
Normal BMI group	19.51 ± 7.24	8.23 ± 6.30	<.001	11.19 ± 8.79
Elevated BMI group	20.04 ± 5.71	10.24 ± 5.25	<.001	9.80 ± 6.84
	P = .755	P = .190		P = .504

Data presented as mean ± SD. BMI, body mass index.

Complications

During the final follow-up, 4 patients in the normal BMI group and 9 patients in the elevated BMI group experienced postoperative complications. A significant difference was observed between the 2 groups (P < .05). Notably, it was observed that 1 patient from the normal BMI group experienced failure, whereas 6 patients from the elevated BMI group experienced failure, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P < .05). Importantly, patients with these surgical failures all experienced recurrent subluxations; however, none of these patients exhibited marked dislocation of the patella. Two patients in the normal BMI group and 2 patients in the elevated BMI group reported anterior knee pain. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. No patients in either group experienced redislocation. In terms of other complications, 1 case of surgical wound infection was observed in the normal BMI group, while 1 patient in the elevated BMI group exhibited a surgical wound scar. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (Table 4).

Table 4

Comparison of Complications^a

				Other, n (%)
Group	n	Surgery Failure, n (%)	Anterior Knee Pain, n (%)	Wound Infection	Wound Scar	Total, n (%)
Normal BMI group	40	1 (2.5)	2 (5.0)	1 (2.5)	0	4 (10.0)
Elevated BMI group	30	6 (20.0)	2 (6.7)	0	1 (3.3)	9 (30.0)
χ²		−	−	–		4.534
P value		.037	≥.999	≥.999		.033

BMI, body mass index.

Dashes indicate that Fisher’s exact test was used, and the χ² statistic is not available.

Discussion

The most important findings of this study reveal that the normal BMI group exhibited a significantly greater improvement in Tegner and Kujala scores when compared with the elevated BMI group (P < .05), while there was no significant difference in improvement in Lysholm and IKDC scores. The normal BMI group demonstrated significantly higher preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores compared with the elevated BMI group (P < .05). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complication was significantly higher in the elevated BMI group as compared with the normal BMI group (P < .05). However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in radiological outcomes between the 2 groups. Therefore, our hypothesis was valid.

In this study, we found that the elevated BMI group showed significantly less improvement in Tegner and Kujala scores compared with the normal BMI group, while there was no significant difference in improvement in Lysholm and IKDC scores. This finding aligns with a previous study by Žlak et al,³⁰ who investigated potential predictors of patient-reported outcome measures in a retrospective analysis of 116 patients. They found a negative association between BMI and patient-reported outcome measures. Another prospective study examined the impact of elevated BMI on the quality of life in patients with patellar instability using backward stepwise multiple regression analysis.¹⁸ The results indicated a significant influence of elevated BMI on patient-reported outcome measures. Similarly, Sherman et al²⁵ used a BMI cutoff of 30 kg/m² to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction between groups that were obese and nonobese. They observed that patients who were nonobese had greater improvements in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life subgroup and Tegner scores compared with patients who were obese. Hart et al⁷ demonstrated a significant correlation between BMI and the severity of chronic knee pain. Patients with patellar dislocation often experience intense patellofemoral pain, which contributes to a fear of redislocation. Consequently, an elevated BMI can further limit their ability to engage in daily activities.²⁷

The current study indicated that preoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores were significantly lower in the elevated BMI group compared with the normal BMI group. This finding aligns with a retrospective study conducted by Zaffagnini et al,²⁹ where a significant association was observed between elevated BMI and inferior preoperative scores. This observation can be attributed to the increased strain placed on the articular cartilage of the medial and lateral compartments due to elevated BMI, resulting in more severe symptoms after patellar dislocation.^4,28

Our study demonstrated a significant association between elevated BMI and an increased incidence of surgical failure, surpassing that observed in the normal BMI group. Previous studies have indicated that the reasons for MPFL reconstruction failure include patella alta,²² trochlear dysplasia,^8,12 and J-sign.²² Furthermore, studies by Sharma et al²⁴ and Lewallen et al,¹⁵ based on adult and pediatric populations, respectively, with patellar dislocation, showed no significant correlation between BMI and recurrent dislocation. However, based on the patients included in the present study, it was found that the incidence of surgical failure was significantly higher in the elevated BMI group compared with the normal BMI group. The increased rate of surgical failure may be attributed to a higher BMI, which can enhance the strain on the graft during knee joint movement, thereby affecting the stability of the patellofemoral joint.

This study discovered that MPFL reconstruction alone significantly restored the patient’s preoperative patellar position–related radiological parameters to normal, regardless of BMI. However, there was no significant difference in the improvement between the 2 groups. Consistent with our findings, Lee et al¹⁴ observed significant restoration of the preoperative patellar tilt angle and patellofemoral trochlear congruence to normal in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation after MPFL reconstruction. Another study also reported similar results for both single-tunnel and double-tunnel fixation techniques.³ Furthermore, studies have indicated that the postoperative change in patellar position after MPFL reconstruction is primarily influenced by surgical technique.^5,10

However, there are certain limitations to consider in this study. First, it is important to note that our study is retrospective in nature and based on a small sample size obtained from a single-center hospital. Consequently, caution should be exercised when generalizing the findings to the wider population. To establish more robust conclusions, it is advisable to conduct future prospective studies with larger sample sizes involving multiple centers. Second, due to the minimum follow-up period of 12 months, the long-term impact of elevated BMI on the efficacy of MPFL reconstruction could not be adequately assessed. Third, it is important to note that the patients in the 2 groups were not enrolled concurrently, potentially leading to the introduction of selection bias. Furthermore, this study included patients with recurrent patellar dislocations of ≥2 episodes. However, the number of dislocations varied among patients, which may introduce potential bias. Last, it is worth noting that potential biases in measuring radiological parameters and collecting subjective functional scores might introduce challenges in drawing reliable conclusions. We did not measure intra- or interobserver reliability, nor were the radiological images blinded to our observers. This oversight could lead to variations in data interpretation, potentially affecting the study’s overall validity.

Based on the study findings, it is crucial to give increased attention to patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and elevated BMI during clinical diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, implementing an intensified weight reduction rehabilitation program after MPFL reconstruction surgery is essential to mitigate the risk of postoperative patellar subluxation.

Conclusion

Footnotes

Final revision submitted December 22, 2023; accepted February 26, 2024.

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81874017, 81960403 and 82160422), Lanzhou Science and Technology Plan Program (2021-RC-102), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province and Cuiying Scientific (21JR7RA393, 22JR5RA956 and 22JR5RA984) and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CY2021-BJ-A13, CY2021-MS-A07 and CY2020-BJ03). AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Lanzhou University Second Hospital (ref No. 2022A-224).

References

Berton

Salvatore

Nazarian

, et al. Combined MPFL reconstruction and tibial tuberosity transfer avoid focal patella overload in the setting of elevated TT-TG distances. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(5):1771-1780.

Corey

Rabe

Yalcin

Saluan

Farrow

LD.

Factors associated with pain and function before medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(8):23259671221116150.

Ercan

Akmese

Ulusoy

Single-tunnel and double-tunnel medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions have similar clinical, radiological and functional results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(6):1904-1912.

Gonzalez

Ryskamp

Swinehart

, et al. Patellofemoral articular cartilage damage is associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes following isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(7):2794-2801.

Grantham

Aman

Brady

, et al. Medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction improves patella tracking when combined with medial patellofemoral reconstruction: an in vitro kinematic study. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(9):2501-2509.

Grelsamer

Bazos

Proctor

CS.

Radiographic analysis of patellar tilt. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(5):822-824.

Hart

Barton

Khan

Riel

Crossley

KM.

Is body mass index associated with patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-regression and analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(10):781-790.

Hopper

Leach

Rooney

Walker

Blyth

MJ.

Does degree of trochlear dysplasia and position of femoral tunnel influence outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction?

Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):716-722.

Hurley

Colasanti

Anil

, et al. Management of patellar instability: a network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(9):2561-2567.

10.

Jones

Koh

Elias

JJ.

Influence of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact pressures in patella alta. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024;27(1):36-44.

11.

Kheir

Salvatore

Berton

, et al. Lateral release associated with MPFL reconstruction in patients with acute patellar dislocation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):139.

12.

Kita

Tanaka

Toritsuka

, et al. Factors affecting the outcomes of double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocations evaluated by multivariate analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(12):2988-2996.

13.

Laurin

Lévesque

Dussault

Labelle

Peides

JP.

The abnormal lateral patellofemoral angle: a diagnostic roentgenographic sign of recurrent patellar subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(1):55-60.

14.

Lee

S-H

Chang

S-S

Chen

I-J

, et al. Clinical outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus autograft for recurrent patellar dislocation. Formosan J Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;5(3):107-116.

15.

Lewallen

McIntosh

Dahm

DL.

Predictors of recurrent instability after acute patellofemoral dislocation in pediatric and adolescent patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(3):575-581.

16.

Marigi

Feroe

Smith

, et al. Surgical stabilization for recurrent patellar instability in competitive wrestlers: outcomes, reoperations, and return to play at 6-year mean follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(10):2608-2616.

17.

Merchant

Mercer

Jacobsen

Cool

CR.

Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(7):1391-1396.

18.

Milinkovic

Jovandic

Zimmermann

Balcarek

The J-sign and the body mass index determine the disease-specific quality of life in patients with lateral patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(5):1672-1678.

19.

Broomfield

Barbosa

Bhangoo

Geutjens

Low re-dislocation rate following Bereiter trochleoplasty for recurrent patellar instability with severe trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(6):2494-2499.

20.

Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.

21.

Sallay

Poggi

Speer

Garrett

WE.

Acute dislocation of the patella: a correlative pathoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(1):52-60.

22.

Sappey-Marinier

Sonnery-Cottet

O’Loughlin

, et al. Clinical outcomes and predictive factors for failure with isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability: a series of 211 reconstructions with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(6):1323-1330.

23.

Schöttle

Schmeling

Rosenstiel

Weiler

Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):801-804.

24.

Sharma

Al-Mouazzen

Kuiper

Gallacher

Barnett

Functional outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction show inverted J-shaped relation with body mass index. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(8):3381-3389.

25.

Sherman

Rund

Welsh

, et al. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in obese patients results in low complication rates and improved subjective outcomes. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5(1):e257-e262.

26.

Straume-Næsheim

Randsborg

Mikaelsen

Årøen

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is superior to active rehabilitation in protecting against further patella dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(10):3428-3437.

27.

Vincent

Lamb

Day

Tillman

Vincent

George

SZ.

Morbid obesity is associated with fear of movement and lower quality of life in patients with knee pain-related diagnoses. PM R. 2010;2(8):713-722.

28.

Widmyer

Utturkar

Leddy

, et al. High body mass index is associated with increased diurnal strains in the articular cartilage of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(10):2615-2622.

29.

Zaffagnini

Grassi

Marcheggiani Muccioli

, et al. Medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) reconstruction for patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2491-2498.

30.

Žlak

Kacin

Martinčič

Drobnič

Age, body mass index, female gender, and patellofemoral cartilage degeneration predict worse patient outcome after patellofemoral instability surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(11):3751-3759.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes With Body Mass Index After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction