Abstract
Objectives:
Tranexamic acid (TXA) use has become common in Orthopedic surgeries. Despite the growing number of publications related to its use, no recent systematic reviews have been published examining TXA use in foot and ankle surgery. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary of the current available literature regarding TXA use in foot and ankle surgery and to further the understanding of its safety and efficacy.
Methods:
This was a systematic review following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as outlined on the PRISMA checklist. Databases utilized included PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL, Clinical Key, Medline, and Embase, and the search was conducted through May 21, 2022. Key words used in the search included: “tranexamic acid,” “TXA,” “foot,” “ankle,” “calcaneal,” and “surgery.” The outcomes within the studies analyzed included measures of perioperative blood loss (intra-operative blood loss, 24-hour postoperative blood loss, blood loss from hour 24 to hour 48, postoperative hemoglobin (Hgb), and postoperative hematocrit (Hct)), as well as wound complications and vascular events. Wound complications and vascular events were defined as infection, hematoma formation, necrosis, dehiscence, DVT, PE, myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cardiovascular event (CVA), limb ischemia (LI), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH), nerve damage, and any other conditions specified as wound complications or vascular events within individual studies. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies included. The quality of the studies included was scored using a modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS). Primary treatment outcomes having data from three or more studies available were summarized in forest plots using RevMan 5.4.1 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Random-Effects models were used to calculate mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome measure. Heterogeneity of studies was assessed using Tau2, Chi2, and I2 statistics. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05 for all comparisons.
Results:
The literature search produced 1125 papers. The full texts of 16 studies were assessed using inclusion and exclusion criteria and seven studies met preliminary inclusion criteria. Upon further inspection, five met full inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. All groups receiving TXA had statistically significantly lower blood loss values at 24 hours. One study found a statistically significant increase in blood loss from 24-48 hours in their A group (TXA) versus non-TXA. Three study groups demonstrated statistically significantly higher values of postoperative hemoglobin in patients receiving TXA versus patients not receiving TXA. Three study groups demonstrated statistically significantly higher values of postoperative hematocrit in patients receiving TXA versus patients not receiving TXA. No studies found statistically significant differences in wound complications between TXA and non-TXA groups.
Conclusions:
Despite a growing amount of literature on the topic, there is still a paucity of literature published on TXA use in foot and ankle surgery. Additional literature is required to determine the best strategy for TXA use to optimize patient outcomes. Current literature suggests that foot and ankle surgery patients treated with TXA may have reduced 24-hour postoperative blood loss, increased postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit when compared to similar patients not receiving TXA. The use of TXA in foot and ankle surgery did not lead to increased thromboembolic complications.