Abstract
Objectives:
Baseball pitchers often participate in throwing programs that involve throwing at reduced effort levels to gradually increase the amount of stress experienced across the elbow. It is currently unknown how reduced effort pitching compares to maximum effort with respect to elbow stress and ball velocity. The purpose of this study is to determine whether elbow stress and ball velocity correlate with reduced effort pitching, whether elbow stress and ball velocity decrease proportionally while throwing at a reduced effort, and to assess intrathrower reliability.
Methods:
Ten healthy male high school baseball pitchers threw 5 pitches from a regulation pitching mound at 3 effort levels: maximum effort, 75% effort, and 50% effort. Elbow stress, specifically elbow varus torque, was calculated for all pitches using a marker-based 3D motion capture system. Ball velocity was measured using a Doppler radar gun. Intrathrower variability was calculated for each effort level.
Results:
Elbow stress and ball velocity decreased with reduced effort throws (p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). However, the reductions in elbow stress and ball velocity were not proportional. At 75% effort throws, elbow stress decreased only 19% and ball velocity decreased only 10%. At 50% effort throws, elbow stress decreased only 25% and ball velocity decreased only 15%. Intrathrower reliability was excellent for elbow stress and ball velocity, with intraclass correlation coefficients all greater than or equal to 0.80.
Conclusions:
Pitching at a reduced effort level resulted in decreased elbow stress and ball velocity. However, for every 25% reduction in perceived effort, elbow stress decreased by a mean of 13% and ball velocity decreased 8%. When baseball pitchers attempt to throw at a reduced effort of maximum, throwing metrics do not decrease proportionately. While pitching at a reduced effort of maximum decreases elbow stress and ball velocity, the decrease is not proportional, subjecting the elbow to more stress than intended. This has significant clinical importance to pitchers, coaches, and medical professionals in the setting of injury prevention and return to sport.
