Abstract
Objectives:
Glenoid bone loss in the setting of recurrent shoulder instability remains a challenging surgical problem. The coracoid process and iliac crest currently serve as primary autograft options for glenoid reconstruction. With regards to allograft alternatives, the distal tibia, first described in 2007, has good midterm outcomes when used during an index surgery and in cases of failed prior Latarjet reconstruction. While the distal tibia performs well in reconstructing the glenoid bony defect, it is a nonanatomic reconstruction and does not match the glenoid radius of curvature (ROC) in the anterior to posterior (AP) plane. No prior work has evaluated and described the utilization of the dorsal articular portion of the distal radius as an allograft reconstruction option for recurrent instability with glenoid bony deficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate distal radius fresh frozen allograft as a potential match for glenoid reconstruction through assessment of graft ROC and bone mineral density (BMD). Distal tibia allograft was utilized as the primary comparison group with both cadaveric and Computerized Tomography (CT) analysis.
Methods:
Eighteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (6 shoulder, 6 wrist, and 6 tibia) were utilized for this study. Specimens without osteoarthritis or prior surgical procedures were included. CT scans were obtained of all specimens to confirm the absence of osteoarthritis, significant joint deformity, or evidence of prior surgical procedure. Specimens were dissected free of all soft tissues except for the glenoid labrum of the shoulder and dorsal wrist ligaments of the distal radius. The ROC for each specimen were independently measured by two fellowship trained shoulder surgeons in both the superior to inferior (SI) and AP planes. Graft length in the SI plane was also assessed. A thirty percent defect was then created in all glenoid specimens and both distal tibia and distal radius grafts were harvested to assess graft fit post-fixation [
Results:
On cadaveric analysis, the mean SI graft length of the glenoid was 39.7 mm compared to 36.8 mm for the distal radius and 30.0 mm for the distal tibia [
Conclusions:
Given fresh frozen allograft supply and cost constraints, exploration of additional graft options is necessitated. This study presents distal radius allograft as a novel reconstruction option for patients with anterior glenoid bone loss in the setting of recurrent glenohumeral instability. Compared with the distal tibia allograft, the distal radius had greater graft length in the SI plane providing possible utilization in cases of larger bony defects. The distal radius also has a more acute ROC in the AP plane (closer to that of the glenoid) compared with the distal tibia allograft providing a greater potential buttress to anterior humeral translation. Furthermore, the distal radius also has potential to employ the dorsal radio-carpal ligaments to perform an anterior capsular repair following allograft fixation. Finally, compared to currently utilized grafts (coracoid process and distal tibia), the distal radius BMD was not significantly diminished on CT analysis. This study presents the distal radius as a novel allograft reconstruction option in the setting of glenoid bone loss; further biomechanical and clinical investigation is indicated.
