Social contract theories serve a twofold purpose: by addressing acute crises, they elaborate solutions to long-standing social paradoxes. The article reinterprets the stakes of the Covid pandemic from this perspective. Firstly, the long-lasting structural paradoxes of late modernity are linked to the acute crisis of the pandemic with the help of critical theories of late modernity. It is argued that the pandemic provides opportunity for revaluating those social contracts, which are based on universalist principles of justice. Secondly, two paradigmatic historical examples (Hobbes, Rawls) are overviewed in a meta-theoretical fashion, so that the dimensions of revaluation could be highlighted. Thirdly, the foundations of a post-pandemic social contract are outlined. As the pandemic is inseparable from the structural paradoxes caused by unconstrained systems based on universal principles of justice, the post-pandemic social contract aims at preventing the system paradoxes by revaluating their universal principles in a ‘trial of particularity’ (Derrida, Levinas).
AdornoTHorkheimerM (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2.
AratoACohenJ (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
AzmanovaA (2021) Battlegrounds of justice: The pandemic and what really grieves the 99%. In DelantyG (ed.) Pandemics, Society and Politics: Critical Reflections on COVID-19. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 244–257.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
6.
BranstetterJ (2017) The Leviathan’s conscience: Hobbesian human nature and moral judgment. Political Research Quarterly70(4): 778–789.
7.
BrubakerR (2021) Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven164(1): 73–87.
8.
BumpJBaumFSakornsinMYatesRHofmanK (2021) Political economy of Covid-19: Extractive, regressive, competitive. BMJ73. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n73.
9.
BunceR (2003) Thomas Hobbes’ relationship with Francis Bacon: An introduction. Hobbes Studies16(1): 41–83.
10.
BurgessG (1990) Contexts for the writing and publication of Hobbes’ ‘Leviathan’. History of Political Thought11(4): 675–702.
11.
CaduffC (2020) What went wrong: Corona and the world after the full stop. Medical Anthropology Quarterly34: 467–487.
12.
CassegårdC (2020) Toward a Critical Theory of Nature: Capital, Ecology, and Dialectics. New York: Bloomsbury.
13.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
CherniloD (2021) Another globalisation: Covid-19 and the cosmopolitan imagination. In DelantyG (ed.) Pandemics, Society and Politics: Critical Reflections on COVID-19. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 157–170.
15.
DavisM (2021) The online anti-public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies24(1): 143–159. DOI: 10.1177/1367549420902799.
16.
DelantyG (2021) Introduction. In DelantyG (ed.) Pandemics, Society and Politics: Critical Reflections on COVID-19. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1–25.
17.
DerridaJ (1998) Hospitality, justice and responsibility: A dialogue with Jacques Derrida. In KearneyRDooleyM (eds) Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy. London: Routledge.
18.
DerridaJ (2000) Of Hospitality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
19.
DunnCLaterzoI (2021) State-level citizen response to COVID-19 containment measures in Brazil and Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America13(3): 328–357.
20.
DurkheimE (1997) The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press
FoucaultM (1997) Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
23.
FreemanS (2009) Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
24.
GalisankaA (2019) John Rawls: The Path to a Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
25.
GraeberD (2011) Debt: The First 5000 Years. New York: Melville House.
26.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
27.
HabermasJ (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon.
28.
HobbesT (1997) Leviathan. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29.
HornE (2021) Tipping points: The Anthropocene and Covid-19. In DelantyG (ed.) Pandemics, Society and Politics: Critical Reflections on COVID-19. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 123–139.
30.
HughesC (1998) The primacy of ethics: Hobbes and Levinas. Continental Philosophy Review31: 79–94.
31.
InglehartRNorrisP (2017) Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics15(2): 443–454.
32.
JennerM (2020) Researching binge-watching. Critical Studies in Television15(3): 267–279.
33.
KatzIWeintraubRBekkerLBrandtA (2021) From vaccine nationalism to vaccine equity: Finding a path forward. New England Journal of Medicine384(14): 1281–1283. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2103614.
34.
KearneyRFitzpatrickM (2021) Radical Hospitality: From Thought to Action. New York: Fordham University Press.
35.
LashS (1999) Another Modernity. London: Sage.
36.
LashS (2002) The Critique of Information. London: Sage.
37.
LashSUrryJ (1987) The End of Organized Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Books.
LevinasE (1969) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40.
LuhmannN (1995) Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
41.
LuhmannN (1997) Globalization or world society?: How to conceive of modern society. International Review of Sociology7(1): 67–79.
42.
McAdamsR (2021) Family separation during COVID-19. Paediatric Research89: 1317–1318.
43.
McConnellT (1978) The argument from psychological egoism to ethical egoism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy56(1): 41–47.
44.
ParsonsTShilsE (1951) Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
PoggeT (2007) John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
RatcliffM (2012) The phenomenology of existential feeling. In MarienbergSFingerhutJ (eds) Feelings of Being Alive. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 23–54.
47.
RawlsJ (1995) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press
48.
RawlsJ (1999) A Theory of Justice, rev edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
RileyP (1982) Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
RiveraJ (2021) Giving as loving: A requiem for the gift?Continental Philosophy Review54(3): 349–366.
51.
RosaH (2010) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
52.
RoseN (1999) Governing the Soul. London: Free Association Books.
53.
RumfordC (2001) Confronting ‘uncivil society’ and the ‘dark side of globalization’: Are sociological concepts up to the task?Sociological Research Online6(3): 101–104.
54.
SikD (2021) Empty Suffering. London: Routledge.
55.
SimmonsW P (1999) The Third. Philosophy & Social Criticism25(6): 83–104.
56.
SommervilleJ (1992) Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. London: Macmillan.
57.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat. London: Bloomsbury Academic
58.
StrattonJ (2021) Coronavirus, the great toilet paper panic and civilisation. Thesis Eleven165(1): 145–168.
59.
Van der LindenSLöfstedt RagnarE (eds) (2021) Risk and Uncertainty in a Post-Truth Society. London: Routledge.
60.
VeneziaL (2015) Hobbes on Legal Authority and Political Obligation. London: Palgrave Macmillan
61.
WardI (1993) Thomas Hobbes and the nature of contract. Studia Leibnitiana25(1): 90–110.
62.
WilkinsonI (2005) Suffering: A Sociological Introduction. London: Polity.
63.
YangD (2022) China’s Zero-COVID campaign and the body politic. Current History121(836): 203–210.
64.
ZafriNMAfrojSImtiazMNMd. Musleh UddinH (2021) A content analysis of newspaper coverage of COVID-19 pandemic for developing a pandemic management framework. Heliyon7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06544
