Abstract
Background:
The meniscal roots play a vital role in maintaining proper knee kinematics. Neglected meniscal root tears place excess stress on the articular cartilage and increase the risk of premature osteoarthritis. As opposed to medial meniscal root tears, lateral meniscal posterior root tears (LMPRTs) are more likely to be associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) pathology. Failure to identify and address meniscal root tears may place undue loads on ACL grafts and lead to inferior post-surgical outcomes.
Purpose:
To examine preoperative knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiologist interpretations for the identification of lateral meniscal root pathology in children and adolescents.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective review of children and adolescents that underwnent knee arthroscopy between 3/1/2010 and 4/1/2020 and had an arthroscopically confirmed LMPRT. Arthroscopic findings were compared to the reading radiologist’s preoperative MRI interpretations. LMPRTs were graded using the LaPrade classification. ANOVA was performed to assess if body mass index (BMI), open physes, time from injury to MRI, time from MRI to surgery, MRI magnet field strength, musculoskeletal radiologist designation, insurance type and tear grade were associated with the preoperative MRI identification of a LMPRT.
Results:
During the study period, 1285 knee arthroscopies were performed. 607 of which were ACL reconstructions. 54 children were found to have a LMPRT arthroscopically and all were associated with an ACL tear 54/607 (9%). One patient had 2 preoperative MRIs for a total of 55 MRIs in 54 pateints. Average age was 16 years (range 14-21). Preoperative MRI diagnosis of a LMPRT was made in only 14/55 (25%) and missed in 22/55 (40%). In 19/55 (35%), pathology of the lateral meniscus nonspecific to the root was mentioned. Lateral joint line tenderness was present in 23/54 (46%). There was no statistical significance found in regards to patient BMI, skeletal maturity, time from injury to MRI, time from MRI to surgery, MRI magnet strength, if the radiologist was musculoskeletal fellowship-trained, or insurance type, with a reliable diagnosis. (Table)
Conclusion:
The final interpretation of preoperative MRIs did not provide a clear definitive diagnosis of a LMPRT in 75 % in patients. As the intraoperative management of LMPRTs can be involved and diverge from standard meniscal work, preoperative diagnosis would be advantageous. All LMPRTs in this study were associated with a concomitant ACL tear. Surgeons caring for ACL tears in children and adolescents should be prepared to treat a LMPRT regardless of a inconclusive MRI interpretation for meniscal root pathology.
