Abstract
Objectives:
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether or not a partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction with accelerated rehabilitation produced similar outcomes to that of the conventional ACL reconstruction with its traditional rehabilitation program timeframe. An improved understanding of these outcomes can change the way partial ACL injuries are treated surgically and return patients back to their chosen activities quicker without compromising their graft.
Methods:
Level III, therapeutic, retrospective study. Participants who were two years post partial ACL reconstruction with accelerated rehabilitation by were contacted. They filled out IKDC, Modified Cincinatti and Tegner Lysholm knee score questionnaires and were measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer for side-to-side instrumented laxity >2 mm as well as indicating if there partial ACL reconstruction had re-ruptured, requiring further surgical intervention.
Results:
All three measurements in this study, including re-rupture rates, side – to – side instrumental laxity and satisfaction scores via questionnaires, were statistically significant, thus showing a partial ACL reconstruction with accelerated rehabilitation is a viable choice for the treatment of a patient with a partial ACL tear of his knee.
Conclusion:
Partial ACL reconstruction with accelerated rehabilitation is a viable choice for the treatment of a patient with a partial ACL tear of his knee.