Identifying the situational and psychological factors that support well-being in disadvantaged sexual and/or gender minority (SGM) youth is important for guiding interventions and policies. The current work investigated differences in the perceptions of caring relationships reported by SGM and cisgender heterosexual youth in foster care and how these differences related to youth’s mental health.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 727 ninth- and eleventh-grade youth in foster care who completed the 2016 and 2019 Minnesota Student Survey. We used t-tests and multiple linear and logistic regression to study the relationship between sexual orientation and gender identity, perceptions of caring relationships, and mental health among youth in foster care.
Results:
SGM youth in foster care perceived people around them as caring about them less than did their cisgender heterosexual peers. Greater perceptions of caring were related to reduced mental health concerns among youth in foster care. Mental health concerns were greater among SGM youth than their cisgender heterosexual counterparts, and these differences existed even when controlling for perceptions of caring.
Conclusion:
SGM foster youth’s perception that the people around them cared about them less than their cisgender heterosexual peers may contribute to differences in mental health often observed among these populations, but cannot wholly explain these differences.
Children’s Bureau. The AFCARS Report. Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC; 2021. Available from: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/afcarsreport28.pdf [Last accessed: February19, 2025].
2.
ScozzaroC, JanikowskiTP. Mental health diagnosis, medication, treatment and placement milieu of children in foster care. J Child Fam Stud, 2015; 24(9):2560–2567; doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-0058-6
3.
WhiteCR, O’brienK, PecoraPJ, et al.Mental health and educational outcomes for youth transitioning from foster care in Michigan. Fam Soc, 2015; 96(1):17–24; doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.2015.96.2
4.
GreesonJKP, BriggsEC, KisielCL, et al.Complex trauma and mental health in children and adolescents placed in foster care: Findings from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Child Welfare, 2011; 90(6):91–108.
5.
NegriffS, JamesA, TrickettPK. Characteristics of the social support networks of maltreated youth: Exploring the effects of maltreatment experience and foster placement. Soc Dev, 2015; 24(3):483–500; doi: 10.1111/sode.12102
6.
PerryBL. Understanding social network disruption: The case of youth in foster care. Soc Probl, 2006; 53(3):371–391; doi: 10.1525/sp.2006.53.3.371
7.
BaamsL, WilsonBDM, RussellST. LGBTQ youth in unstable housing and foster care. Pediatrics, 2019; 143(3):e20174211; doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4211
8.
DettlaffAJ, WashburnM, CarrLC, et al.Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth within in welfare: Prevalence, risk and outcomes. Child Abuse Negl, 2018; 80:183–193; doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.009
9.
WilsonBDM, KastanisAA. Sexual and gender minority disproportionality and disparities in child welfare: A population-based study. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2015; 58:11–17; doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.08.016
10.
LaBrenzCA, YuM, WashburnM, et al.Experiences of perceived support post discharge among foster care alumni: Differences among LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color. J Public Child Welf, 2023; 17(3):569–594; doi: 10.1080/15548732.2022.2069202
11.
Bederian-GardnerD, HobbsSD, OgleCM, et al.Instability in the lives of foster and nonfoster youth: Mental health impediments and attachment insecurities. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2018; 84:159–167; doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.019
12.
McGuireA, ChoB, HuffhinesL, et al.The relation between dimensions of maltreatment, placement instability, and mental health among youth in foster care. Child Abuse Negl, 2018; 86:10–21; doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.012
13.
HatzenbuehlerML. Advancing research on structural stigma and sexual orientation disparities in mental health among youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 2017; 46(3):463–475; doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1247360
14.
MatareseM, GreenoE, WeeksA, et al.The Cuyahoga Youth Count: One county’s prevalence of and experience data from LGBTQ+ youth in out-of-home placements. J Public Child Welf, 2025; 19(4):935–954; doi: 10.1080/15548732.2024.2375309
15.
ChesmoreAA, WeilerLM, TrumpLJ, et al.Maltreated children in out-of-home care: The relation between attachment quality and internalizing symptoms. J Child Fam Stud, 2017; 26(2):381–392; doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0567-6
16.
ChuPS, SaucierDA, HafnerE. Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. J Soc Clin Psychol, 2010; 29(6):624–645; doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624
17.
Williams-ButlerA, RyanJP, McLoydVC, et al.Relational permanence and psychological well-being among African American adolescents in foster care. J Child Fam Stud, 2018; 27(10):3277–3287; doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1155-8
18.
MageeC, GuhnM, Schonert-ReichlKA, et al.Mental well-being among children in foster care: The role of supportive adults. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2019; 102:128–134; doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.005
19.
FarruggiaSP, GreenbergerE, ChenC, et al.Perceived social environment and adolescents’ well-being and adjustment: Comparing a foster care sample with a matched sample. J Youth Adolesc, 2006; 35(3):330–339; doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9029-6
20.
BarreraMJr., Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. Am J Comm Psychol, 1986; 14(4):413–445; doi: 10.1007/bf00922627
21.
CohenS, WillsTA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull, 1985; 98(2):310–357; doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
22.
MeyerIH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull, 2003; 129(5):674–697; doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
23.
LefevorGT, Boyd-RogersCC, SpragueBM, et al.Health disparities between genderqueer, transgender, and cisgender individuals: An extension of minority stress theory. J Couns Psychol, 2019; 66(4):385–395; doi: 10.1037/cou0000339
24.
TaliaferroLA, McMorrisBJ, EisenbergME. Connections that moderate risk of non-suicidal self-injury among transgender and gender non-conforming youth. Psychiatry Res, 2018; 268:65–67; doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.068
25.
Ross-Reed DE, Reno J, Peñaloza L, et al. Family, school, and peer support are associated with rates of violence victimization and self-harm among gender minority and cisgender youth. J Adolesc Health 2019;65(6):776–783; doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.013
26.
Anonymous authors. Pre-registration and analysis: Social support and mental health outcomes among LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual youth in foster care. OSF: Charlottesville, VA; 2022. Available from: https://osf.io/jr8z5/?view_only=14b0062ffb3a46baad1a3f962e2bec10 [Last accessed: February19, 2025].
27.
Minnesota Student Survey Interagency Team. Minnesota Student Survey 2016. Minnesota Department of Education: Minneapolis, MN; 2016. Available from: https://education.mn.gov/mde/dse/health/mss/ [Last accessed: February19, 2025].
28.
Minnesota Student Survey Interagency Team. Minnesota Student Survey 2019. Minnesota Department of Education: Minneapolis, MN; 2019. Available from: https://education.mn.gov/mde/dse/health/mss/ [Last accessed: February19, 2025].
29.
Minnesota Student Survey Interagency Team. About MSS. Minnesota Department of Education: Minneapolis, MN; 2025. Available from: https://mss.mn.gov/MSS/about/ [Last accessed: June9, 2025].
Minnesota Student Survey Interagency Team. Census Design for Eligible Respondents. Minnesota Department of Education: Minneapolis, MN; 2025. Available from: https://mss.mn.gov/MSS/about/ [Last accessed: June9, 2025].
32.
Minnesota Center for Health Statistics. Tables: Minnesota Student Survey Data. Minnesota Department of Health: St. Paul, MN; 2024. Available from: https://www.health.state.mn.us/data/mchs/surveys [Last accessed: June5, 2025].
LöweB, KroenkeK, GräfeK. Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). J Psychosom Res, 2005; 58(2):163–171; doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.09.006
36.
RichardsonLP, RockhillC, RussoJE, et al.Evaluation of the PHQ-2 as a brief screen for detecting major depression among adolescents. Pediatrics, 2010; 125(5):e1097–e1103; doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2712
37.
SpitzerRL, KroenkeK, WilliamsJBW, et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med, 2006; 166(10):1092–1097; doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
38.
HughesJL, GrannemannBD, TrombelloJM, et al.Psychometric properties of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale in youth: Screening in a primary care sample. Ann Clin Psychiatry, 2021; 33(4):241–250; doi: 10.12788/acp.0047
39.
AhrensKR, DuBoisDL, RichardsonLP, et al.Youth in foster care with adult mentors during adolescence have improved adult outcomes. Pediatrics, 2008; 121(2):e246–e252; doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0508
40.
MunsonMR, McMillenJC. Natural mentoring and psychosocial outcomes among older youth transitioning from foster care. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2009; 31(1):104–111; doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.06.003
41.
Zahn-WaxlerC, ShirtcliffEA, MarceauK. Disorders of childhood and adolescence: Gender and psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2008; 4(1):275–303; doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091358
42.
CyrusK. Multiple minorities as multiply marginalized: Applying the minority stress theory to LGBTQ people of color. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health, 2017; 21(3):194–202; doi: 10.1080/19359705.2017.1320739
43.
Rubin-McGregorJ, HeittJ, HungerJ. Multiple marginalized identities, minority stress, and mental health. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 2025; 19(8):e70077; doi: 10.1111/spc3.70077
44.
CénatJM, McInteeSE, MukunziJN, et al.Overrepresentation of Black children in the child welfare system: A systematic review to understand and better act. Child Youth Serv Rev, 2021; 120:105714; doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105714
45.
GroomsJ. No home and no acceptance: Exploring the intersectionality of sexual/gender identities (LGBTQ) and race in the foster care system. Rev Black Polit Econ, 2020; 47(2):177–193; doi: 10.1177/0034644620911381
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
