Abstract
We report a case of
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune, systemic disease that principally affects the synovium. Its prevalence is about 1% worldwide. 1 Women are affected 3 times more than men and onset is usually between 30 and 50 years.
Evidence has shown that early and aggressive management of RA with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has proven beneficial in slowing disease progression. 2 NICE guidance supports the multidisciplinary team approach with physiotherapy, occupational therapy, podiatry, and psychotherapy. 3 Pharmacological treatment includes analgesics, steroids, and DMARDs. With the advent of biologics, a new era of DMARD therapy has introduced various drugs such as anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), anti-CD 20, anti–interleukin (IL)-6,and anti-IL-1. We currently have five anti-TNF drugs in the market to treat RA. These are infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab, and golimumab.
Anti-TNF drugs have a relatively good safety profile but are associated with several adverse events, which include the risk of malignancy, demyelinating disorders, lupus-like syndrome, congestive heart failure, and opportunistic infections.
4
Patients with severe RA are prone to infections. We present a case of
Case Report
A 43-year-old British Indian business manager was treated for active RA. Over 3 years he had received sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and methotrexate (MTX). Due to inefficacy and adverse effects, the DMARDs were stopped and certolizumab was commenced according to NICE guidelines with ongoing high disease activity. Within 1 month of commencing certolizumab, he traveled to Hong Kong during which he had a brief episode of gastroenteritis with fever. This was a self-limiting illness with spontaneous recovery within 2 days. Fifteen days later, he presented to our Rheumatology Department for a routine clinic visit. Clinical examination revealed typical rheumatoid changes with restricted range of movements of MCP, wrist, and elbow joints. His inflammatory markers were not significantly elevated in keeping with good RA disease control.
A musculoskeletal ultrasound examination performed at this clinic attendance, which did not reveal significant disease activity at the MCP, PIP, or wrist joints. However, in contrast, an ultrasound (US) examination of his left elbow revealed a moderated degree of synovial thickening a small amount of fluid, and positive power Doppler suggested an active inflammatory process. Clinical examination showed no joint tenderness, mild swelling, and restricted range of movement (extension limited to 150°), which was unchanged from previous clinic attendances. Given the monoarticular activity revealed on US examination, a decision was taken to aspirate this joint under US guidance despite the lack of clinical features of infection. His joint aspirate showed pus cells, macrophages, and neutrophils. Culture grew
Discussion
A population-based study by Doran et al suggested that patients with RA were at increased risk of developing infections compared with non-RA subjects. This may be due to immunomodulatory effects of RA or due to agents with immunosuppressive effects used in its treatment. 5
In further support of the notion of increased infection risk in patients with RA is the finding that up to 40% of patients with septic arthritis have RA. 6 The annual incidence of septic arthritis in the general population is 2 to 5 per 100 000, and patients with preexisting RA were at an increased risk of septic arthritis (odds ratio = 4.0, 95% confidence interval = 1.9-8.3). 7 One study suggested the annual frequency of septic arthritis to be 0.2% among patients with RA. 8
Septic arthritis in patients with RA was initially described by Bywaters 9 and by Kellgren and colleagues. 10 Typically, septic arthritis presents with acute onset of severe joint pain, with very limited range of movements, accompanied by swelling and erythema at the affected joint. There are also systemic manifestations of infection including fever, elevated white blood cell count, and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate. However, with RA the onset is more insidious and is mistaken for a flare of RA. The presentation may be with either a monoarticular or a polyarticular distribution. Polyarticular pattern may be seen in 10% to 20% of cases. The knee joint is involved in about 50% of cases. The presentation may be more subtle in patients on immunosuppressants (glucocorticoids, disease modifying drugs, and biologics).
Biologics such as adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept have been in the scene for more than 10 years and have proven efficacy in RA. Certolizumab is a pegylated human monoclonal anti-TNF-α antibody and is one of the latest anti-TNF in the market. The RAPID 2 study showed that certolizumab pegol plus MTX was more efficacious than placebo plus MTX. The certolizumab combination rapidly and significantly improved clinical features, physical function, and inhibited radiographic progression. 11
The anti-TNF drugs are associated with unusual and atypical viral and fungal infections, tuberculosis, and bacterial infections. The meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, the German and Spanish registries, and a re-analysis of BSR Biologics Register (BSRBR) data suggest that TNF inhibitor use is associated with an approximate doubling of risk of serious infection, particularly early on in the course of therapy.12-14 The RAPID study showed 7% serious infections. Two cases of tuberculosis were reported, but there were no opportunistic infections. 11
BSRBR data showed that patients on anti-TNF therapy were twice as likely to develop septic arthritis as controls (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.7). This risk was greatest during the first year of therapy, peaking at around 10 months after commencement. Among the responsible organisms found in 41% of cases,
BSRBR reported that the risk of septic arthritis with specific anti-TNF were etanercept HR 2.3 (CI = 1.2-4.4), infliximab HR 1.6 (CI = 0.8-3.2), and adalimumab HR 1.8 (CI = 1.0-3.5). Five cases of intracellular infection (2
Wallis et al
40
have identified 11 cases of anti-TNF-associated
Three cases of
Quick diagnosis is essential to prevent joint destruction. Urgent aspiration of the affected joints is required, followed by antibiotic therapy. Because of the subtle presentation with RA and presence of some “sterile” joints, there is often a delay in the diagnosis of the septic arthritis in these patients. Blackburn et al 46 reported an average delay in diagnosis of 13.7 days. Radiologic investigations such as bone and gallium scans are often not helpful at the onset in distinguishing between infectious arthritis and inflammatory arthritis in patients with underlying inflammatory arthritis. 47
Grassi suggested that sonographic examination should be directed to the site of clinical symptoms, or where abnormalities or confusing findings are present on other imaging studies. In comparison with radiography, US has the potential advantage of depicting tendon lesions, enthesitis, fluid collection, synovial proliferation, cartilage damage, and even minimal interruptions of the cortical bone profile that are frequently missed by conventional radiography because of their size and localization. 48
In the same study, sonographic erosions that were not visible on radiography corresponded by site to MRI bone abnormalities. Hau and coworkers showed that ultrasonography provides better results than clinical examination alone. 49 Kraan and colleagues showed that ultrasonography and MRI both can detect subclinical synovitis with corroborative macroscopic and microscopic data from arthroscopy in clinically normal knees of patients with RA. 50 Karim and coworkers compared ultrasonography of the knee with the “gold standard” of arthroscopy, as well as clinical examination, to validate ultrasonographic images in terms of accurate representation of the pathology present in the joint. 51 They concluded that ultrasonography was valid and reproducible, as well as superior to clinical examination for detecting knee synovitis.
Makkuni et al emphasized on hygiene advice in patients on anti-TNF therapy. They felt counseling was very important as there were particularly no vaccines against
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
