This study seeks to explore whether the negative mentoring experiences (NMEs) of protégés in Western samples are generalizable, or whether there are possibly NMEs unique to the Indian cultural context. The finding of this exploratory study suggests that the most frequently occurring NME for protégés was mismatch in the membership of social group, as per regional, caste or religious orientation. While Western mentoring models are being practised widely in corporate workplaces in India, the process of enculturation and feeling of belonging to an India-specific social group is strong enough to negatively impact mentoring relationships such that these protégés perceive themselves to be “out-group” members. Managers may consider pairing mentors and protégés taking into consideration demographic profiling.
AllenT. D.EbyL. T.Poteet M. L.Lentz E.LimaL. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–136.
2.
BarkemaH. G.ChenX. P.GeorgeG.LuoY.TsuiA. S. (2015). West meets east: New concepts and theories. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 460–479.
3.
BoiesK.HowellJ. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246–257.
4.
BozemanB.FeeneyM. K. (2007). Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration & Society, 39(6), 719–739.
5.
BudhwarP. S.BhatnagarJ. (2008). The changing face of people management in India. UK: Routledge.
6.
BudhwarP. S.SparrowP. R. (2002). Strategic HRM through the cultural looking glass: Mapping the cognition of British and Indian managers. Organization Studies,23(4), 599–638.
7.
BurH. G.EbyL. T. (2010). What keeps people in mentoring relationships when bad things happen? A field study from the protégé’s perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 437–446.
8.
ByrnD.CloreG. L.SmeatonG. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1167–1170.
9.
ChandlerD. E.KramK. E.YipJ. (2011). An ecological systems perspective on mentoring at work: A review and future prospects.Academy of Management Annals,5(1), 519–570.
10.
ChatterjeeS. R. (2007). Human resource management in India: “Where from” and “where to? Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 15(2), 92–103.
11.
ChenG.ChittoorR.VissaB. (2015). Modernizing without westernizing: Social structure and economic action in the Indian financial sector. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 511–537.
12.
ClutterbuckD. A.KochanF. K.LunsfordL.DominguezN.Haddock-MillarJ.(Eds.). (2017). The Sage handbook of mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
13.
CookeF. L. (2018). Concepts, contexts, and mindsets: Putting human resource management research in perspectives. Human Resource Management Journal,28(1), 1–13.
14.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
15.
CoyneI. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing,26(3), 623–630.
EarleyP. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal,36(2), 319–348.
18.
EbyL. T. (2007). Understanding relational problems in mentoring (pp. 323–344). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice.
19.
EbyL. T.AllenT. D.HoffmanB. J.BaranikL. E.SauerJ. B.BaldwinS.Evans>S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441–476.
20.
EbyL. T.McManusS. E.SimonS. A.RussellJ. E. (2000). The protégé’s perspective regarding negative mentoring experiences: The development of a taxonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(1), 1–21.
21.
EnsherE. A.MurphyS. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 460–481.
22.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM.KooleM.KappelmanJ. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education,9(1), 1–8.
23.
GerstnerC. R.DayD. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
24.
GhoshR.ReioT. G. (2013). Career benefits associated with mentoring for mentors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 106–116.
25.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years—Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly,6(2), 219–247.
26.
GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of Socialization.New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
27.
HegstadC. D. (1999). Formal mentoring as a strategy for human resource development: A review of research.Human Resource Development Quarterly,10(4), 383–390.
28.
HensleyW. E. (1996). A theory of the valenced other: The intersection of the looking-glass-self and social penetration. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal,24(3), 293–308.
29.
HofstedeG. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,1(2), 81–99.
30.
HoggM. A.MartinR.EpitropakiO.MankadA.SvenssonA.WeedenK. (2005). Effective leadership in salient groups: Revisiting leader–member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,31(7), 991–1004.
31.
HooperD. T.MartinR. (2008). Beyond personal leader–member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly,19(1), 20–30.
32.
HumberdB. K.RouseE. D. (2016). Seeing you in me and me in you: Personal identification in the phases of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Review,41(3), 435–455.
33.
KhiljiS.RowleyC. (2013). Globalization, change and learning in South Asia. Oxford: Elsevier.
34.
KramK. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625.
35.
KramK. E.. (1985). Mentoring at work. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
36.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research,30(3), 411–433.
37.
KnightsD.OmanovićV. (2016). (Mis) managing diversity: Exploring the dangers of diversity management orthodoxy. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(1), 5–16.
38.
KobergC. S.BossR. W.ChappellD.RingerR. C. (1994). Correlates and consequences of protégé mentoring in a large hospital. Group & Organization Management, 19(2), 219–239.
39.
KumarP. (Ed). (2018). Exploring dynamic mentoring models in India. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
KumarP.KumarS. (2018). Mentoring in a start-up company with millennial recruits. In KumarP.(Ed.), Exploring dynamic mentoring models in India (pp. 49–65). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
LeCompteM. D.GoetzJ. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research,52(1), 31–60.
42.
MaxwellJ. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
43.
MengesC. (2016). Toward improving the effectiveness of formal mentoring programs: Matching by personality matters. Group & Organization Management, 41(1), 98–129.
44.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
45.
MitchellL. D. (2018). What makes an effective mentor: A cross-cultural (BRIC) comparison. In KumarP. (Ed.), Exploring dynamic mentoring models in India (pp. 109–121). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
NeiderL. L.SchriesheimC. (2010). The “dark” side of management. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
47.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
48.
ParkJ.-Y.NawakitphaitoonK. (2018). The cross-cultural study of LMX and individual employee voice: The moderating role of conflict avoidance. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), 14–30.
49.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A. (2008) Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.
50.
PierretC. R. (2001). Event history data and survey recall: An analysis of the national longitudinal survey of youth 1979 recall experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 36(3), 439–466.
51.
RamaswamiA.DreherG. F. (2010). Dynamics of mentoring relationships in India:A qualitative, exploratory study. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 501–530.
52.
ScanduraT. A. (1998). Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes. Journal of Management, 24(3), 449–467.
53.
SenguptaJ.SarkarD. (2012). Caste and religious diversity on formation of social capital: A field survey in India and measurement issues. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(2), 158–175.
54.
SchriesheimC. A.CastroS. L.CogliserC. C. (1999). Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly,10(1), 63–113.
55.
SimonS. A.EbyL. T. (2003). A typology of negative mentoring experiences: A multidimensional scaling study. Human Relations, 56(9), 1083–1106.
56.
SrikanthP. B.JomonM. G. (2015). Perception of managerial competency needs: An Indian perspective. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management,2(2), 139–170.
57.
Van de VijverF. J.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
VarmaA.SrinivasE. S.StrohL. K. (2005). A comparative study of the impact of leader–member exchange in US and Indian samples. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal,12(1), 84–95.
59.
WanbergC. R.WelshE. T.HezlettS. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. In BuckleyM.R.HalbeslebenJ.R.B.WheelerA.R.(Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 22, pp. 39–124). Oxford: Elsevier.
60.
WhitelyW.DoughertyT. W.DreherG. E. (1991). Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers’ and professionals’ early career progress. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 331–351.
61.
WilliamsK. Y.O’Reilly IIIC. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In StawB.CummingsL.L.(Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). London: JAI Press.
62.
WoodJ. T.DuckS. E. (1995).Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
63.
WuP. C.FooM. D.TurbanD. B. (2008). The role of personality in relationship closeness, developer assistance, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior,73(3), 440–448.
64.
YukiM. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 166–183.
