Perceiving the Domicile Reservations in India from the Legal and Sociological Perspective

Abstract

The issue of domicile reservations in India is highly debated and controversial, with significant legal and sociological implications in contemporary discourse. One such discussion comes after the Madhya Pradesh state government’s announcement to reserve 100 per cent of public jobs for the domiciles. Nonetheless, this approach is not limited to one political party; however, most political parties broadly adopted such policies across India. Some states have devised an alternative way to reserve seats for the locals by making the knowledge of the local language compulsory, which, in reality, has become a way to deny opportunities to the people of other states. Initially, these matters of domicile were limited to educational institutions and public-sector jobs; however, they later became matters of private employment. Considering this whole debate, it seems vital to have an inclusive and critical analysis of the domicile reservation’s legal, sociological and economic aspects according to the constitutional provisions, different case laws and reports. Moreover, this article tries to contend with the state government’s justifications for the domicile reservation by analysing their arguments and ramifications from different aspects (including larger notions like meritocracy, unity and integrity) to see whether such reservation is beneficial or carries more detrimental effects.