As the Zeme society was predominantly a subsistence-based economy, land was an asset for them. In contextualising, this study employs Polanyi’s ‘Embeddedness’ to examine how the notion of land is dictated by the social obligation and moral context in the Zeme society and how Zeme society perceives and evaluates the land values. The article locates the land settlement system, changes in land practices, types of land and land taboos vis-à-vis customary law locating the influence of Western education. Furthermore, the article analysed how English-educated individuals with salaried jobs maintain their interest in village land causing a decline in the customary law of the landownership. This study is based on primary and secondary sources and aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on land.
AroraV. (2007). Assertive identities, indigeneity, and the politics of recognition as a tribe: The Bhutias, the Lepchas and the Limbus of Sikkim. Sociological Bulletin, 56(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920070202
2.
AtkinsP., SimmonsI., & RobertsB. (1998). People land and time: An historical introduction to the relations between landscape, culture and environment. Arnold, Hodder Headline Group.
3.
AtungbouN. (2016a). An ethnographic study of the zeme paupaise. University of Hyderabad.
4.
AtungbouN. (2016b). Practice of taking Ndeu (price of a woman) in the Zeme society. International Journal of Research, 3(5), 21–27.
5.
AtungbouN. (2020). Food practice for physical and spiritual well-being of the Zeme, the tribe in Northeast India. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 7(1), 1–9.
6.
BariamR. (2023). State and local conservation traditions: A comparative study of fortress conservation and traditional forest forts. Journal of North East India Studies, 13(2), 31–54.
7.
BodhiS., & ZiipaoR. R. (2019). Land, words and resilient cultures: The ontological basis of tribal identity. Tribal Intellectual Collective India.
8.
BoruahC., & DasD. (2022). Female labour force participation rates in Assam: Trends, composition and determinants. Indian Journal of Human Development, 16(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/09737030221074557
9.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
10.
ChackoA. M., & ScariaS. (2023). Land ownership and well-being of women in a village in Kerala. South Asia Research, 43(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280231163077
11.
DanaJ. D. (1890). The genesis of the heavens and the earth and all the host of them. I. The Old and New Testament Student, 11(1), 12–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3157436
12.
DavyB. (2009). The poor and the land: Poverty, property, planning. The Town Planning Review, 80(3), 227–265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27715102
13.
FentonC. L. (1921). The origin and development of the earth. The American Midland Naturalist, 7(4/5), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992950
14.
FoldvaryF. E. (2008). The marginalists who confronted land. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(1), 89–117.
15.
GaffneyM. (1994a). Land as a distinctive factor of production. Land and Taxation, 39–102.
16.
GaffneyM. (1994b). Neo-classical economics as a stratagem against Henry George. In The corruption of economics (pp. 29–163). Shepheard-Walwyn Publishing Co.
17.
GodaraS., & JosephK. (2022). Customary laws of the Zeme Naga of Senapati District in Manipur with special reference to the administration of justice in Ze-Mnui village. Guineis Journal, 9(1), 225–235.
18.
Government of India. (2012). Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order (Amendment) Bill, 2011. Ministry of Law and Justice. https://www.india.gov.in/constitution-scheduled-tribes-order-amendment-act-2011
19.
Government of India. (n.d.). ST statistical profile-at a glance. Ministry of Tribals Affairs. https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/Statistics8518.pdf
20.
Government of India. (2011). Census 2011. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of Home Affairs.
21.
GriersonG. A. (1909). Linguistic survey of India. Vol. III. Tibeto-Burman family. Part I. general introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, The Himalayan dialects and North Assam group. Superintendent of Government Printing.
22.
HaokipT. (2013). The Kuki–Naga conflict in the light of recent publications. South Asia Research, 33(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728013475545
23.
HaokipT. (2021). From ‘Chinky’ to ‘coronavirus’: Racism against Northeast Indians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Ethnicity, 22(2), 353–373.
24.
HarrelsonW. (1956). Creation. The Christian Scholar, 39(1), 45–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41176928
25.
HearnJ. (2018). How to read the wealth of nations (or why the division of labor is more important than competition in Adam Smith). Sociological Theory36(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118777010
26.
HubacekK., & van den BerghJ. C. (2006). Changing concepts of ‘land’ in economic theory: From single to multi-disciplinary approaches. Ecological Economics, 56(1), 5–27.
27.
KameiR. (2018). Tribal land, customary law, and the Manipur land revenue and land reforms act. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(19), 52–56.
28.
KhiamniunganT. (2014). Inequality in Nagaland: A case study of ‘advanced’ and ‘backward’ tribes. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(02), 71–78.
29.
KikhiK. (2009). What ails the North-east? Challenges and responses. Sociological Bulletin, 58(3), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920090303
30.
KrishnajiN. (2018). Dynamics of land inequality: Polarization or pauperization?Indian Journal of Human Development, 12(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703018788742
31.
LhungdimH., HariharSahooH., & LadusinghL. (2021, July). Population growth, ethnic diversity, socio-economic status, and healthcare utilization in North East India: With special reference to the recognized tribes[IIPS working paper No. 21]. https://www.iipsindia.ac.in/sites/default/files/IIPS_Working_Paper_Series_No_21_0.pdf
MorrisR. E. (1968). The land question: The theory re-examined. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 27(2), 147–154. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3485269
39.
MuirD. (2008). A land without a people for a people without a land. The Middle East Quarterly.
40.
MyrdalG. (2008). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations (Volume 2). Kalyani Publishers (Original work published 1968).
41.
NgaihteS. T. (2013). The reality of North-east as an entity. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(50), 13–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24479035
42.
OwensL. (1999). The immortal spirit of creation: Kazantzakis and the Bhagavad Gita. New Blackfriars, 80(943), 397–408. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43250264
43.
PhanjoubamP. (2022, June11). Ironic that earth day celebration brought to the fore Manipur’s toxic hill-valley divide, but is this divide primal or recent. Imphal Review of Arts and Politics. https://imphalreviews.in/ironic-that-earth-day-celebration-brought-to-the-fore-manipurs-toxic-hill-valley-divide-but-is-this-divide-primal-or-recent/
44.
SomingamP. S. (2021). Reading ‘colonial’ and ‘post-colonial’ methodologies on land: Perspectives from the hill tribes of Manipur. Journal of North East India Studies, 11(1), 17.
45.
SamsonK. (2019). Social identity of Zeliangrong people of Assam, Manipur and Nagaland. Sociological Bulletin, 68(2), 221–237. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48564533
46.
ScariaS. (2010). Changes in land relations: The political economy of land reforms in a Kerala village. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(26/27), 191–198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40736700
47.
ScariaS. (2014). Do caste and class define inequality? Revisiting education in a Kerala village. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 11(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184914529012.
48.
ScariaS. (2021). Irrigation and inclusiveness in health: A study of two villages in North East Karnataka. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 9(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249211007701
49.
SenA. (2006). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. Penguin Book Ltd.
50.
SinghT. B. (2007). Poverty in Manipur. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(3), 251–254.
51.
SitlhouH. (2015). Patriarchal bargains and paradoxical emancipation: Issues in the politics of land rights of Kuki women. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 22(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521514556949
52.
SmithA. (2017). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, BennethJ. (Eds.). (Original work published 1776). University of Chicago Press.
53.
SmithP., GregoryP. J., Van VuurenD., ObersteinerM., HavlíkP., RounsevellM., WoodsJ., StehfestE., & BellarbyJ. (2010). Competition for land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2941–2957.
54.
TadakaG. (2023). Capitalising caste in Yadadri: The case of land market in a temple town. Economic & Political Weekly, 58(52), 66–72.
55.
The Morung Express. (2016, March12). Central Nagaland Tribes Council launched. https://morungexpress.com/central-nagaland-tribes-council-launched#:~:text=It%20may%20be%20mentioned%20that,of%20unity%2C%20fraternity%2
56.
The Wire. (2023, June9). Modi epitomises the fault-line between North east and rest of India; His deliberate silence hurts[Video files]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH7Sk9KOD84&t=1913s&ab_channel=TheWire
57.
ZiipaoR. R. (2020). Infrastructure of injustice: State and politics in Manipur and Northeast India. Routledge.
58.
ZiipaoR. R. (2023). Out of coverage area: Tribes and digital exclusion in North-east India. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/24551333231163930
