Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the rural women’s participation in the micro-credit programme on their levels of empowerment in different domains, namely, savings, use of money, physical mobility, decision making, health and children’s education. For this purpose, we applied the method of propensity score matching to appropriately measure the empowerment gains after addressing the problem of selection biases arising out of differences in observable characteristics of the members of the treatment (participant) and the comparison (non-participant) groups. To measure the influences of various family/social conditions on the individuals’ agency freedom, we applied the framework suggested by the Self-Determination Theory (SDT). The data used in this study have been collected through a field survey in six blocks of Midnapore district of West Bengal. Our overall conclusion is that the participation in the micro-credit programme by the rural women in our study areas helped to enhance their levels of empowerment at least in some domains.

Keywords

Micro-credit women empowerment propensity score matching self-determination theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerly

B.A.

(1995). Testing the tools of development: Credit programmes, loan involvement and women’s empowerment. IDS Bulletin, 26(3), 56–68.

Agarwal

(1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.

Alsop

Bertelsen

M.F.

Holland

(2005). Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Alkire

(2007). Measuring agency: Issues and possibilities. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(1), 169–175.

Becker

S.O.

Ichino

(2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.

Dehejia

R.H

Wahba

(1998). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental casual studies. NBER Working Paper # 6829, Cambridge MA.

Duvendack

(2010). Smoke and mirrors: Evidence of microfinance impact from an evaluation of SEWA bank in India. Working Paper # 24, DEV Working Paper Series, The School of International Development, University of East Anglia, UK.

Goetz

A.M.

Sengupta

(1994). Who takes the credit? Gender, power and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–63.

Government of India. (2008–2009). Annual report. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development.

10.

Government of India. (2010–2011). Annual report. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development.

11.

Hashemi

S.M.

Schuler

S.R.

Riley

A.P.

(1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh, World Development, 24(4), 635–653.

12.

Heckman

J.J.

Ichimura

Todd

(1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.

13.

Heckman

J.J.

Ichimura

Todd

(1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.

14.

Kabeer

(1999). The conditions and consequences of choice: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. UNRISD Discussion Paper # 108.

15.

Pitt

Khandker

(1998). The impact of group based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5): 958–996.

16.

Rahman

R.I.

(1986). Impact of the Grameen Bank on the situation of the rural poor women. Grameen evaluation project, Working Paper # 1, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, Dhaka.

17.

Ravallion

(2005). Evaluating anti-poverty programs. World Bank Policy Research Paper # 3625, The World Bank, Washington DC.

18.

Rusenbaum

P.R

Rubin

D.B.

(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for casual effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.

19.

Ryan

R.M.

(1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.

20.

Ryan

R.M

Deci

E.L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

21.

Sen

(1985). Well-being, agency and freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.

22.

Sen

(1992). Inequality re-examined. New York: Oxford University Press.

Impact of Micro-credit Programme on Women’s Empowerment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References