Women’s reservation policies have substantially expanded female political participation in India, yet the representation of Muslim women continues to remain disproportionately low across levels of governance. Drawing on detailed administrative data from the 2016 and 2021 Panchayat elections in Bihar, this study examines the institutional, structural and behavioural mechanisms that shape Muslim women’s political inclusion. Using a supply-side framework, the analysis formalizes two key determinants of contest entry, past co-ethnic competitiveness and demographic potential, and shows how these factors jointly influence women’s decisions to contest elections. The results highlight the central role of institutional design and strategic expectations in shaping minority women’s political agency, even in communities where demographic conditions appear favourable for political representation.
BanR., & RaoV. (2008). Tokenism or agency? The impact of women’s reservations on village democracies in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(3), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/533551
2.
BeamanL., ChattopadhyayR., DufloE., PandeR., & TopalovaP. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497
3.
BeamanL., DufloE., PandeR., & TopalovaP. (2012). Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science, 335(6068), 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212382
4.
BhalotraS., & Clots-FiguerasI. (2014). Health and the political agency of women. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 164–197. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.2.164
5.
Bihar State Election Commission. (2016). Panchayati Raj election results, Bihar. Government of Bihar. https://sec.bihar.gov.in/archive
6.
Bihar State Election Commission. (2021). Panchayati Raj election results, Bihar. Government of Bihar. https://sec.bihar.gov.in/archive
7.
CaselliF., MorelliM., & Raimondos-MøllerP. (2020). The incentives to enter politics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.2.3
8.
ChattopadhyayR., & DufloE. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x
9.
Clots-FiguerasI. (2011). Women in politics: Evidence from the Indian states. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (7–8), 664–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.017
10.
GhaniE., KerrW. R., & O’ConnellS. (2014). Female entrepreneurship and labor force participation in India: Evidence from district-level industrial policies. World Bank Economic Review, 28(3), 558–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht053
11.
Government of India. (2011). Socio-economic and Caste, Census (SECC), 2011. Ministry of Rural Development. https://secc.dord.gov.in/
12.
HeathO., VerniersG., & KumarS. (2015). Do Muslim voters prefer Muslim candidates? Co-religiosity and voting behaviour in India. Electoral Studies, 38, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.008
13.
IversenV., & RaghavendraS. (2019). What the signboard hides: Women’s political representation and local governance in India. World Development, 115, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.001
14.
IyerL., ManiA., MishraP., & TopalovaP. (2012). The power of political voice: Women’s political representation and crime in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.165
15.
JaffrelotC., & GayerL. (2012). Muslims in Indian cities: Degrees of segregation and the elusive ghetto. India Review, 11(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2012.706744
16.
JefferyP., & JefferyR. (2006). Confronting squalor: Social reform, Muslim tradition and Indian politics. Permanent Black.
17.
JenseniusF. R. (2017). Social justice through inclusion: The consequences of electoral quotas in India. Oxford University Press.
18.
KandiyotiD. (2007). Between the hammer and the anvil: Post-conflict reconstruction, Islam and women’s rights. Third World Quarterly, 28(3), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701192343
19.
LeeD. S. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.004
20.
OsborneM. J. (1995). Spatial models of political competition under plurality rule: A survey of some explanations of the number of candidates and the positions they take. Canadian Journal of Economics, 28(2), 261–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/135957
21.
PaikS. (2014). The politics of representation: Gender, caste, and participation in India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 73(3), 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814000531
22.
SacharR., HamidS., OommenT. K., BasithM. A., BasantR., MajeedA., & ShariffA. (2006). Social, economic and educational status of the Muslim community of India. Government of India, Prime Minister’s High-level Committee.
23.
SusewindR. (2015). What’s in a name? Probabilistic inference of religious community from South Asian names. Field Methods, 27(4), 319–332.
