BasuM. (2023, April24). Indian PhDs, professors are paying to publish in real-sounding, fake journals. It’s a racket. ThePrint. theprint.in. Accessed on 5July2024.
2.
ChattopadhyayS. (15January2024). Research assistant wanted: The outsourcing of intellectual labour reveals academia’s colonial roots. Scroll.in. Western academia’s use of Indian research assistants. scroll.in. Accessed on 4July2024.
3.
DaigneaultP. M., BirchL., BélandD., & BélangerS.-D. (2021). Taking subnational and regional welfare states seriously: Insights from the Quebec case. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(2), 239–249.
4.
DeshpandeR. (2011). How does the system encourage academic dishonesty?Economic & Political Weekly, 46(8), 14–16.
5.
HausingK. K. S. (2015). Framing the North-East in Indian politics: Beyond the integration framework. Studies in Indian Politics, 3(2), 277–283.
6.
KingG. (1995). Replication, replication. Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452.
7.
KumarS., TrivediP., & SinghS. (2017). Research output: Discipline-wise analysis of themes. In ThoratS. & VermaS. (Eds.), Social science research in India: Status, issues, and policies (pp. 175–266). Oxford University Press.
8.
MascarenhasA. (2018). Over 88 per cent of UGC-approved list of journals are dubious, finds study. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com. Accessed on 5July2024.
9.
SinghS. (2015). Status of political theory in India. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 76(4), 750–755.
10.
ShapiroI. (2002). Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or what’s wrong with political science and what to do about it. Political Theory, 30(4), 596–619.
11.
ThoratS., & VermaS. (Eds.). (2017). Social science research in India: Status, issues, and policies. Oxford University Press.
