AdeneyK., & WyattA. (2004). Democracy in South Asia-getting beyond the structure and agency debate. Political Studies, 52(1), 1–18.
2.
AnckarC. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401.
3.
BhogaleS., HangalS., JenseniusF. R., KumarM., NarayanC., NissaB., & VerniersG. (2019). TCPD-IED: TCPD Indian Elections Dataset. Trivedi Centre for Political Data.
4.
GiraudyA. (2013). Varieties of subnational undemocratic regimes: Evidence from Argentina and Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(1), 51–80.
5.
HarbersI., BartmanJ., & van WingerdenE. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring subnational democracy across Indian states. Democratization, 26(7), 1154–1175.
6.
HarrissJ. (1999). Comparing political regimes across Indian states: A preliminary essay. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(48), 3367–3377.
7.
HeathO., & ZiegfeldA. (2022). Why so little strategic voting in India?American Political Science Review, 116(4), 1–7.
8.
HellerP. (2000). Degrees of democracy: Some comparative lessons from India. World Politics, 52(4), 484–519.
9.
HuntingtonS. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34. 10.1353/jod.1991.0016
10.
JalalA. (1997). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia. Ratna Pustak Bhandar.
11.
KohliA. (1987). The state and poverty in India: The politics of reform. Cambridge University Press.
12.
LiebersonS. (1991). Small N’s and big conclusions: An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases. Social Forces, 70(2), 307–320.
13.
LijphartA. (1971). Comparative politics and comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.
14.
OlssonO. (2009). On the democratic legacy of colonialism. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 534–551.
15.
PrzeworskiA., & TeuneH. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Krieger Publishing Company.
16.
SnyderR. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93–110.
17.
TillinL. (2013). National and subnational comparative politics: Why, what and how. Studies in Indian Politics, 1(2), 235–240. 10.1177/2321023013509153
18.
Van EveraS. (1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Cornell University Press.
